Despite the popular news "themes" in many quarters: (a problem right there, because news should be objective, impartial & factual but not thematic) ...
This book writing stuff makes for hungry clocks, posts here are too infrequent, I think. Trade-offs never go away, but anyway on to the post of the day:
69 Comments
Yesterday I received a preview of The Dim Period, about ¾ of the sun was gradually blocked then unlocked. The reduced brightness during the episode was obvious; most interesting was walking from shade into much weaker sunlight. It's going to be interesting when this happens for not just an hour or two, but all day every day, along with warmer temperatures. I predict sharp production decreases for sunscreen lotion. The comments about the Hamas terrorists attacking Israel were interesting. Consider these points:
Just ahead The Committee weighs in on this situation. Shifting roads, a reader recently asked about the Mexico City display of alien extraterrestrial corpses a few weeks ago, said to have been found in Peru. Are these remains bona fide bodies of Visitors-To-Earth? The Committee says: "No." On to the posts of the day...
Oooops, no post in more than two weeks. I have to step up my game again, this book writing stuff eats time like a clock. The Committee hasn't written us a poem in some time; here we go.
= = = = = = = = = = The As attacked the Bs The world she hardly sneezed True Death for Jews Boy that'll be news Blowing like shit in the breeze Can we provoke the Great Satan? Get them to intervene? Make them stop all their waitin' Give us what we really mean? The most dangerous person to have Is someone with nothing to lose Can we make them calve By causing a bad enough bruise? Your friends from afar they are watching Examining again human slaughter How progress again you are botching Care you not much for your daughters? Welcome the day when you’ll see Dead is not what to be Choose a path not a weapon Worry only for where you are steppin’. Overflows again the old conflict Just as it has been planned Derelicts promising something Big, bold and so grand This life plan event was an option A choice that could be made not Observe the events unfold ugly And directions human blood shall now clot. Better separated for answers from The Committee.
================================================================= List of questions for the wonderful Pleiadeans: Q: Can their ship enter the Sun? P: No, our vessels cannot enter any star or even come within certain close distances. Q. And enter Black holes? P: What humans believe black holes to be is inaccurate but, in any case, we cannot pass through these inter-universal portals. Q. How do Pleiadeans keep out the heat and pressure of the atmosphere of planets like Jupiter? P: We use magnetism to counter unwanted magnetic and gravitational effects. We create a surrounding vacuum to neutralize effects of pressure and temperature. Q. If I wear a wristwatch during the trip, after coming back to the earth, would I see difference in time in my watch with other watches? If so, by how much would it vary? P: The time will change but depends very much on the type of watch. The magnetic fields you would likely cross, would stop a mechanical watch temporarily and certainly magnetize it to the point its accuracy would render it useless. In a hypothetical example where no physical effect to the timekeeping device are possible, a timekeeping device from Earth would come under the same effect as Doppler identified phenomena occurring to Earth atmosphere sound. The duration and direction of the voyages, to and from, will determine the overall effects on a timepiece. Q. Space is not totally empty. How do they avoid collision with small particles? P: We extend a magnetized protective layer to push away objects we encounter without warning sufficient to change course to avoid. Q. Do the Pleiadeans have any kind of spacesuit to enable them to get out of the ship and physically land on the surface of Venus, for example, or on the Ganymede? P: Yes, on many space objects, but we rarely use such equipment. The problem is an object's very different gravity compared to our own. It is always so vastly different that we struggle with our surface presence. Q. How many habitable planets are there in the Pleiadean system and can humans get off onto their planets without any protection? P: Seven; yes. Q. While entering the ship, how is this slow adjustment to the dimensionality done? Is there a passage or something where we need to wait or move slowly? P: Simply by waiting. Q. Apart from physical trauma, can an abrupt change in dimension result in mental issues? P: Yes, and there is little and often no difference between mental and physical problems. They often cause one another. Q. Can't we simply "teleport" ourselves (like star trek) onto a planet instead of travelling by a ship? P: No, that technology is a fantasy for our dimensionality of being, being ourselves and humans, and is useless above it. The Star Trek transporter represents a fantastical hybrid between true dimensions, which is preposterous for such physical movement(s). Q. If we were to take a trip to a Pleiadean planet. What would it look like from space...much like earth? Are there green vegetation, seas similar to earth or different? P: Yes, very much like Earth in most cases, but not as much liquid. Q. Is the dimensionality on a Pleiadeans planet different? If we get out of the ship to a Pleiadeans planet, does the dimensionality of a human passenger need to be adjusted gradually? Or can we get out there straightaway from the Pleiadean ship? P: No, no and yes. Q: "This is achieved by changing the dimensional vibration of the physical surroundings, increasing it above what is possible on Earth" How is this accomplished? P: Belief and mental force. No belief means no mental force will work. Q: Could it be possible to have from you some real pictures? P: No and for this reason: Half of humanity would immediately reject the photographs as fake. A small portion of cautious but skeptical believers would be swayed by the Master Rejectors and the public judgment would be rendered; faked. Q: ...the two mummies are for real alien corpses preserved by mummification? If yes, are they from one of the four civilizations watching over us? If not, what are they? P: No and fakes, a hoax. Q: Do we really are detecting biological life tracers from the K2-18b planet? P: Yes. Updated from 9 September, answers revealed; replies to reader questions also included.
Instead of having The Committee answer questions only The Committee can —added to my reactions and responses— I thought readers would prefer to read them as a new post and also be able to save it.
R: Didn't the so called "Nibiru" planet originate in our Solar System? Where is it located now? C: Nibiru is what stripped Mars of its magnetic field and destroyed the former fifth planet to create the asteroid belt. It has also added mass to the asteroid field, and is invisible because it cannot be seen.”
Answers The Committee: 1. No, the two are not related; not close in either distance or sequence, what humans might say is time. The skewed or tilted orbit of Uranus occurred and does still, because the planet was created outside the solar system, was picked up and drawn into orbit. Large and far enough to fall outside complete gravitational and magnetic control of your sun yet also small enough to be attracted. Uranus was drawn very close to your central star, then flung far out as it rounded the sun. Saturn did so to a greater degree however Jupiter also but just a little, distorted the plane the planet might have otherwise adopted. Jupiter had much less influence because it was much farther away from Uranus' outbound trajectory. These distortion effects added to the tilt of the planet's orbit. Because humans have not observed this, human astrology would discount or outright dismiss what we have just offered. 2. Two events, one encounter. The rogue planet labeled Nibiru passed so close to Mars that it neutralized the magnetism of the Red Planet, was flung away from its previous very slow and plodding trajectory by your faster moving solar system and high relative magnetism, then hurled towards and drawn by the asteroid planet's gravity. The results of the impact occurring eons ago, are seen through any large enough telescope. 3. The remnants of Nibiru are not invisible, the rocks and chunks now easily seen are the debris remaining. The planet is invisible because it no longer exists as a planet. 4. Mediator and diplomat. ============================================ A reader comments and asks: Following some YT channels, I've stumbled on one that is named MARSX3D. There is shown footages form the vehicles that roamed and are still roaming on Mars. In this case, the curator of the channel just filters out the images to make them more crisp (without altering the informative content of the pixels) and present them in couples slightly staggered, to allow a stereoscopic combination to form a real 3d image. This procedure is done to remove paraedolia, that is the creation of images that are produced by our brain by association (as happens seeing figures in the clouds) The amount of things that are undeniably artifacts, scattered on the mars surface is staggering: broken pillars, part of machineries, statues, clogs, levers, pipes, boxes, inscriptions, and on and on... It seems that an ancient civilization just lived there, and got wiped out by some cataclysmic event, that literally broke and melted everything. But that event cannot be happened too much in the past, in my opinion: something between 10.000 and 40.000 years in the past, so the cataclysm should not be the rogue planet. 40.000 is to a short timeframe to allow things to settle on a planetary level, it would need millions of years. So, the questions for the Committee:
If not, what the heck are those artifacts that we see littering the Martian terrain? (to have an idea, maybe see some videos on that YT channel) On a sidenote, I'm pretty much convinced that currently microbic life still lingers on Mars, but below the surface. Answers The Committee: 1. Yes, but the artifacts you describe are not remnants of previous Martian civilizations. Thos items could be found but much more exploration and archaeology would be required. If encounters with ET Visitors-To-Earth are well handled, your extraterrestrial cousins will certain offer to show you what they have learned about Mars through their own examinations of the planet. What appear in these videos are items left behind by much more recent visitors, going to Mars long after the atmosphere was stripped away after the loss of its gravitational field. Mars was the scene of interplanetary conflict, what human might call territorial wars between ET civilizations. No prime directive to stay away has been imposed; no life as humans or Alien ET Visitors-To-Earth might know it, can survive on Mars. It is an open field, able to be occupied by whomever wishes. 2. To respond with who they were is more like what were they. Humanoids long gone. 3. The ancient, ancient civilizations lived before the planet was demagnetized; they all perished as a result of the event. 4. Vastly different. Mars resembled Earth in many ways. Microbes indeed live beneath the planet's surface. ================================================================== On to today's topic: 🔜
Many questions, the answers from The Committee having expanded to the point of requiring a separate post, available now and below with just one click. About watching the skies yesterday (18 August) a reader wrote & asked: My Lord have I been missing this show every night or was it a special gift? Says The Committee: "Both; our recommendation that the skies be watched, was accurately interpreted by some readers as unrestricted to nighttime. Each of you would see something new even if you have looked up many a time; rarely does the sky look the same and always appears different against the always changing surroundings on the surface. This reader is an excellent example of what we intended, as an insight into Heaven and what happens to all of and each of you every day and every visit. Each time you sleep and come home for a visit, a new sky do you see." On to our "solis et planetarum."
By popular request, the topic above. Shifting gears, I noticed the chatter about watching the sky two days from now on the 18th. I have asked The Committee for clarification but gotten none. For all we humans know, they could be referring to a pretty sunrise or a supernova. We shall see, shall we not? A comment asked about orbs; a well-treated subject here. Essentially they are points of light which appear in photographs appearing as transparent disc(s), often when the photographer is dealing with the souls of the deceased, angels or some form of energetic being. Sometimes, light reflection and refraction through the camera lens can cause a similar or nearly identical effect, especially with outdoors shots. The reason the orbs appear in photographs but are not seen by humans, is the limitation of the human eye & brain; just as we cannot see a small object moving at or above the speed of sound, for example a bullet, the orbs appear and disappear too fast for the eye to capture the image, have the brain register & recognize it. If I remember correctly, 24 frames or photos per second used to be the standard pace for movies and television. I don't believe most people see much difference at faster frame rates but for realism; the more photos per segment of elapsed time, the more lifelike becomes a video. At 24 per second, each frame takes 1/24 or 0.04166667 of a second; shutter speeds of modern cameras can be set much faster, capture an orb and display it in the image. Orbs are light which bleeds through, flashing into our dimensions for a few hundredths of a second, or less.
|