Oh man I was jumping for joy seeing this post , thank you so much Patrick , but will I ever see the words Trump Will Be Inaugurated in 2021 from The Committee here soon ? A funny story from my 86 year old mother to whom I’ve explained repeatedly who and what Patrick and The Committee are and she even asks me sometimes What’s Patrick got to say ? Yesterday I overhear her talking on the phone to her friend , “ All I know is Kimmy has this friend named Patrick and he’s a , ya know , one of those Voodoo Zulu Soothsayers , and he says Trump will win and Kimmy says Patrick is a perfectly normal man and that he’s from Texas , so I don’t know about all that .” So later I say to her Mom Patrick is NOT a Voodoo and she answers Stop spying on me ! Hahahaha
That’s a funny story :-) The handful of friends and family members that I am keeping up to date with news from this site refer to Patrick as “your ET specialist” when they inquire about news regarding the situation of the world :-) Sorry, Patrick, I really do not just tell them the ET news, and that is by far not all they want to know about! Go figure, you’re still the ET guy now... Take it as an endearing term coming from Swiss hillbillies!
On another note, beautiful picture of our capital Bern with the Alps in the background, thank you Patrick!
@ Kim and Jude,
I really enjoyed reading your comments about your family’s reference to Patrick and TC. I also share this site with my family, friends, and even with strangers on social media. Yesterday my youngest son was explaining something about his life to me and his step-father and said, “Benefit without responsibility is not”. That quote was something TC said a long time ago here. It was something that stuck with me and helped me as a mother. I smiled to myself when he said that. It must have stuck with him too.
As Thanksgiving approaches here in the US, I am filled with gratitude for many things.
@Patrick and TC, I’m grateful for all that you have provided. And I am grateful that I was able to have a private reading from you guys years ago when those were offered. Now looking back at that reading and the TC’s response regarding my concerns about my youngest son, and the helpful advice TC provided to my oldest son, and how loving and wise the advice was, I appreciate you and TC even more! God bless you, Patrick and your family and to The Committee ❤️ My heart is full
Wow this post was quite the revelation. I like the direct answers to the questions from the committee.
But I do fear that if the plan to stop Trump from being inaugurated fails they go with plan b,c,d,e or f.
I hope he won't be murdered in his second term.
Because if they are willing to murder 2 million people with coronavirus just to tamper the electios they sure as hell are capable and willing of killing Trump.
Exactly two fifteenths (2/15) or more than 13% of US Presidents have been attempted assassinated, two survived, four did not. Ronald Reagan was the last (survived) John Kennedy before him, who was "DRT" (Dead Right There).
Protection around the US President begins as a candidate and continues for life, reflecting this sad reality.
The anger, backlash & general revolt would not be worth the effects. So few people would believe any explanation, that even the handful who did would become social outcasts.
I have been around US Presidential security. Never again.
@Patrick: So this would mean that so far no attempt at President Trump’s life was made? I was under the impression from an earlier comment made by TC that such attempts were undertaken but not successful and not necessarily known to the wider public. I may have misinterpreted their remark...
I also wonder about the rumoured body doubles for First Lady Melania Trump. I have seen pictures in the past of which I am pretty sure that the woman in the picture was not Mrs. Trump but a lady who looked a lot like her. Are such body doubles used? Frequently? And is security the main driver behind it?
And last but not least, given the tricky circumstances in which a President such as Mr. Trump is placed in, I wonder who is in charge of the security for him and his family? I mean, how does he know who can be trusted in the shark-infested waters that he is navigating? I am thinking that he must have a tremendously solid team behind him to still be alive, considering the relentless efforts by the HCP to remove him from office.
@ Jude: Doubles are used constantly, it is always haphazard for obvious reasons. Much more common are multiple vehicles, two limousines (really tanks with windows) and many following vehicles. Often the president isn't even in one of the limousines. Two jets fly, but nobody knows which one carries the president, or maybe he is aboard the Doomsday plane which always goes along?
Attempts are always made, but thwarted, rarely publicized and never if they can be kept quiet.
The US Secret Service provides immediate executive protection. Thousands of agents are in that service. Military protection comes from the US Air Force and Marines. These organizations are too large to successfully infiltrate.
The people who could threaten Trump could kill him easily also, but if the decision to eliminate him were made, he'd receive no warning. He has been threatened and called the bluff. All US presidents are told to stay in line. That's why Trump is losing the election.
These discussions are fascinating. Why does everyone want Trump to be the winner? I'm on neither side as I'm not American and I don't judge anyone, but yeah this is quite interesting! BTW I'm not a follower of ANY Politics in any country not even my own LOL
To ask the question "Why does everyone...?" means you're following it somewhat, and probably being fed the popular media narrative.
Everyone in the USA? Tens and tens of millions of citizens are thrilled Trump might leave office.
Everyone here on this website? I'll speak for myself, I want the winner to be the candidate with who prevails honestly, under the long established system and election laws. If any were properly modified to provide for mail-in ballots, that's being kept VERY secret.
So , there are people that coldly designed this slaughter just to grab power.
The tought make me feeling sick.
Just a week ago two relatives of my family died by COVID. They were beautiful people, we dearly miss them.
Just feeling sick of the madness of people, which are meant to die sooner or later, trashing lifes like this.
Also I'm feeling sick of their life review: couldn't even begin to imagine the task of sustain such a tsunami of emotions and pain inflicted... are they really souls so strong to accept to do this?
Sorry, but today is not a nice day
"....are they really souls so strong to accept to do this?"
Of course. Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin, Tojo, Robespierre....
@Pierluigi--love and prayers from my heart to you and your dear family. I cannot imagine the sorrow and outrage you must feel at this time.
My heart hugs you my friend. Sorry for your families loss of loved ones.
Dear Pierluigi, So sad to read about your family bereavement, holding hands across the land & seas. Wishing you light to help.
Patrick, will the results be overturned before the end of 2020? I’m dying over here waiting for all the crying to start like in 2016.
The Committee is simply saying: "Large developments are coming towards the end of December, in about one month."
Crying by whom about what?
The Electoral College Will Meet December 14, 2020,
it's a less than a month...will the decision be made on this date or later?
Or will it end up on the highest Supreme Court, decide the election!?
Because Hillary lost in 2016
@ Laura: I'm going to take small exception to an expectation of whining & crying by disappointed political supporters.
This is development of emotional attachment. For public policy, government and politicians, nobody should attach emotion to people hired to run government functions. Such officials should be looked at with a skeptical, even doubtful eye, at all times.
It would be interesting to study why some supporters experience disappointment to the point of crying, when a preferred candidate loses. I would never give such study any time; doing so would increase emotional investment in politicians and bring about more of the same. Politicians and government? We have gorged ourselves into political obesity around the world, and We Humans need a financial and mental diet from both, starting with a one month fast.
Preparing for January 2021: Lorie Ladd
The Truth is EXPLOSIVE, if it comes out
It will NOT.
Dear Patrick , the truth will NOT come out ?
No, not what The Committee explained here.
Thanks to Patrick and The Committee for being forthcoming with this detailed information and confirmation of what many consider to be "conspiracy theories." I would much rather know the ugly truth than a pretty lie, but it will take some time to process the magnitude of what TC has revealed here.
P.S. @Lorri--sending you light and Reiki today--11/23. Hope all is well.
Being rather dense myself, I would be grateful if someone can explain to me what the problem is.
Usually, voting fraud may include:
(1) Dead man voting;
(2) Multiple voting (by the same person);
(3) Fake votes (ballot box stuffing);
(4) Problem with the computer programme or voting machine.
But it seems the esteemed GAG is not saying any of the above, but illegal changing of voting procedures, ie ballots were sent out without specific request by the voter. Therefore, any such ballot received should be excluded? Am I reading this correctly?
I am confused which and why some ballots should be excluded in order to give Trump a winning edge. There were almost 80 million votes for Biden, vs about 74 million for Trump. We need to throw out 6 million votes in order to deliver Trump the election. Did 6 million ballots arrive by mail late and hence should be excluded?
You're not thick mate, I can't see how this works either ??🤔🤔
"...We need to throw out 6 million votes in order to deliver Trump the election." Let me guess; this comment = a Biden voter?
Here's an example of the fraud. Georgia did not have general, mail-in ballots, voters had to use the absentee ballot system. This involves the voter requesting it, it is NOT sent to a registered voter without that specific request.
Once it's returned, it arrives inside a protective envelope, concealing the identity of the voter. The verifiable signature, which should match the same voter registration record previously checked to confirm the request, is AGAIN checked.
Then the envelope is placed into one stack, the ballot another. After counting, both should be saved BECAUSE a re-count is always possible if any race is close enough to qualify. This is the situation in Georgia.
If you have not read this in the news, it's because you're following the election but have been buried under an avalanche of news and comments about it OR many news organizations simply do not report the story. Other news organizations have reported at least two counties in Georgia where five to six thousand ballots were not counted, at all.
Georgia is going to have two run-off elections for Senator, because neither race was won by a wide enough margin. The difference in the presidential race to take all of Georgia's electoral votes is also very close, well inside the margin which qualifies for a re-count.
Frankly, an audit should be performed before any re-counts.
What says the Governor of Georgia? That a re-count of the absentee ballots can be done BUT the validity of them cannot be verified because the outside security envelope which contains the signature is separated from the ballot then discarded, the ballot then counted.
This is very convenient. Introduce many fake ballots, then claim they were valid when first counted but destroy the evidence, but keep the ballot. This allows many fake ballots to be introduced, without a way to verify them.
There is also a list kept of absentee ballot requests. When one is requested by a voter, their voter registration record indicates that, to prevent them from double voting. If they choose to vote in person and not mail-in the absentee ballot, their voter record is marked to cancel any paper allot which has or later arrives in the mail.
If the envelope is thrown away, how can it be proved the citizen only voted once? Or proved s/he voted twice?
This is evidence of voter fraud, or it isn't? For someone who wants Trump out of office, this is very good.
Mr. Obama was born in Kenya, disqualified for the USA's presidency
Mr. Trump is accomplished and talented beyond nearly any human
If the Committee really said these things I just threw up in my mouth
Candidates don't get elected by popular votes. There is no need to throw out 6 million votes in order to deliver Trump the election. In 2016, Hillary got almost 3 million votes more than Trump but Trump still won 306-232
So, I assumed, believed, have been committed to TEC saying Trump would win the election.
What I have been asking myself is this. TEC said Trump would win, actually by a lot....but also I am wondering if they meant if the election was lawful and no fraud, he would win but they have also said things such as they were not asked about fraud and such in the prediction.
Does this mean that yes, Trump won but he will not be our next president because of fraud, skullduggery and such?
They said Kamala would be the POTUS for 8 years after Trump. Did they mean that yes, Trump actually won but...he won’t be our next POTUS because of the fraud and Biden will be elected but will not actually serve because Nancy Polosi and others will have him declared incompetent and then Kamala will be POTUS?
Maybe I am over thinking 🤔🧐😩
Making my head hurt🤣🧐🧐🧐
Hmmm...actually someone earlier asked about Kamala, if she still would be president 2024...because if Trump doesn't win this election, then plan, (according to TC) would be that with Biden now and Kamala later the democrats would be on power for the coming 16 years ....or will the plan change for the future...how does it look now?
Sorry, I meant 12 years on power...
Dear Critter, thank you for your kind words.
Concerning Kamala, it was explicitly said that her first term would begin in 2024.
Concerning Trump, it was explicitly said that he will win a second term , so he will be your next president, starting from 2021.
Have a nice day
Correct however one small adjustment. Trump will continue as president, he already is at the moment.
@Critter: I am quite certain TC said that Mr. Trump was going to be the president until 2024. They also said we should lean back and enjoy the show. So I think that we should try to do just that and be confident. Be strong! We need America to be great again, and I am saying this as a European with very little idea of politics, but I sure would like the world to become at least a little better every day, and having someone in The White House who is brave and strong enough to not be a puppet of the HCP is definitely a very good thing in my opinion.
I see no great countries out there as measured by how unequally wealth is distributed and by how much poverty is acceptable to society. Perhaps once the bonds of HCP control are broken we'll see greatness shine through.
Yes, you guys are right. That is what TEC said. I will stay strong and keep believing 😃
I think I need less news. Funny how it can start brain washing a person even when the person knows better than to believe them🤓
@ alex campbell: The distribution of wealth should not be a goal, objective or destination and in fact, its measurement should be discarded. It should receive almost no attention and not in sharp focus.
The beginning of Leninist tyranny starts with this notion, but it's a ruse. The objective of discussions about wealth distribution is to prepare the serfs for a new oppressor.
Wealth never sits still. Today's ideal distribution can change quickly.
The objective should be wealth CREATION. Where the greatest number of people have the largest spread of opportunities, wealth CREATION will expand positively. Wealth becomes well distributed, the percentages of poor & rich shrink.
This is what has occurred since January 2017 in the USA.
@ Critter: The Committee is not going to spoil the fun. Watch the show.
It looks like your trying to push a square peg into a round hole, Critter...either that or your right, overthinking...
Yes, definitely overthinking LOL....it is a really bad habit of mine. 🤷🏻♀️🤦🏽♀️😁
With the majority of the people not liking the Democrats' policies ... wondering how this is going to end ... maybe the states will not stay United anymore and going their own way like Texas as TC said ....
Hi everyone im not sure if lorri had her surgery yesterday I think it was but can't remember but hopefully if she did have it things went good.
Yes, wishing Lorri a speedy recovery with hopefully not a lot of pain 💕
I’d like to relate a dream I had 4 years and a few days ago, which I have thought about a lot lately. Please do not take this dream story literally. I wrote it down at the time. I think it was probably meant to be ambiguous and open to interpretation. The dream seemed to go on for ages and I felt very peaceful and relaxed when I woke up, a key point.
In the dream the President was making a speech from a raised platform in a hall. The audience included senior political leaders from China and what looked like uniformed senior US and I think Chinese military. (Would not happen in real life. It was an important audience). The President had a discomfort, staggered and could not complete the speech. (Again, not to be taken literally). It seemed to be more out of anger rather than anything medical. A female senior US person got up and completed the speech and handled it very well. She was calm, assured, well informed, mild-mannered yet assertive and gave a very good impression. At the end the audience were very pleased and clapped enthusiastically.
At the time I did not recognise this person as I’m not familiar with too many US personalities as I’m outside the US. I assumed she was a senior WH staffer. The day after the election I felt disappointed and thought that I had misinterpreted the situation. Then about two weeks ago I was amazed to see a good likeness of this person appear in the media. I have been watching ever since.
A key point for me is the peaceful and relaxed feeling. I realise it won’t be easy as there is a lot at stake. I’m not expecting an unambiguous outcome or a fast result as we all watch this play out.
In my opinion, inalienable rights must rank above laws passed by politicians of the day in order to reduce distortion and corruption. The system depends on confidence and the actual vote count is the outcome but not the process. So for example, if only two citizens wanted to continue with their inalienable rights, this could not be outvoted by any number without declaring the Republic over, which the vast majority of people do not want to see I believe. Having said that, as we saw with Brexit, if citizens and politicians want change they have to vote for it. It is nearly 4 and a half years since the Brexit referendum, so plenty of time for citizens, politicians and pundits to horse-trade.