But first, a reader question, which asks:
RQ: Do any spirits or souls ever incarnate on Earth purely because they feel unhappy or unfulfilled in heaven? Respondeth The Committee: = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = No. Incarnation as a human is never undertaken for such a frivolous reason. Human life is the opposite of entertainment. Nearly every human interacts with dozens of humans before making it out of the toddler stage; by adulthood almost every human has interacted with thousands of people, often many more. The majority of the interactors would have to agree to serve as entertainment for the bored soul who incarnates to fulfill personal existence, or to reverse unhappiness. What gives human life such value is that it is even more serious than your natural existence in Heaven. Humans can die at any time; have you ever given deep consideration to the causes of human death fear? The human who does not or cannot die has yet to be invented, and this is understood nearly universally among mankind. It is also universally understood across the place which lends its name to that adverb, the fourth word of this sentence. Human fear of death is caused by lost opportunity to grow. Allow us to repeat that; human fear of death arises from the risk of becoming unable to pursue additional growth. Because human existence creates reliance on the body and its senses, other sensory & communication talents, skills & abilities can be de-emphasized. This has happened across nearly all of mankind but was not always the case. The idea humans have the ability for telepathy and remote viewing, conflicts with the industrial revolution, human technology and the hidden, controlling powers. Accordingly, humans are indoctrinated against such ideas from a young age. This cycle perpetuates and has risen to the level of common thinking, sense and belief. It is not true. Human life is so serious, it is observed by a million times more souls than now live upon the surface of your planet, as humans. The number eight followed by fifteen zeros, more than a quadrillion. The absence of fulfillment, boredom, unhappiness and discontent are extremely strong incarnation features, representing a powerful attraction precisely because they do not and cannot exist in Heaven, as on Earth." = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Click the link below for the hogwash:
41 Comments
Asks a reader: When a child dies do they continue on as a child spirit when they get back to heaven, or do they go back to who they were before they incarnated?
Responds The Committee: "No humans can exist in Heaven as you describe it. All humans are in Heaven, right now and always, in the past and future; once the human body is discarded, your soul reverts to its natural appearance. To the human eye, this is a bright point of light in Heaven, what would be called a star. These become visible to humans on the Earth's surface in a greatly reduced way, called orbs. The majority of the light cannot be seen by a human. No such thing as a child or adult spirit does or can exist; the consideration of age is human." Do these post title's terms fall within the province of New Age buzzword? What's Old Age? How does it set up or precede, thus help create New Age?
Q: Esteemed Committee, let's hit that first question straight off; are they? C: Greetings, salutations and our welcome once again we offer to all Earth travelers who come to read what we say, our gratitude and our thanks. Please accept our wishes for your enhanced awareness and contentment, which follow the knowledge you might develop, arising from thoughts we offer. Yes, most certainly. The title terms buzz like bees. Q: Okay, second question; what is Old Age compared to New Age? C: The human preference for novelty and excitement brought, compared to known thus less exciting things. Q: Okay, that addresses the third question also. Let's dig into the old soul concept. C: You cannot, old souls do not exist, young souls do not exist. Q: I recently saw a headline about how a person can determine if s/he is an old soul in a young body. C: A human body can be young or old according to the timeline calendar of the Earth surface environment, but the body a soul uses in a different incarnation is never older or younger than the body from a distinct, different incarnation. All souls are young and old simultaneously. Time does not exist in your true home, aging is not possible. Neither youth nor middle or old age are part of existence. More incarnations do not make a soul better experienced at incarnation; the life plan or contract a soul designs, typically excludes knowledge of Heaven, easy access to or conscious memory of it, thus knowledge, abilities and insights gained during other incarnations. A soul might choose to include a talent or skill learned in another incarnation, but this is optional, never required. A soul can also select a great human skill, talent, ability or seemingly rare gift to be employed, displayed and used during a human incarnation, without ever having learned this as a human. You can grant yourself a musical ability similar to Mozart, without ever having played an instrument, studied, composed or promoted music in any way. Q: From where originates the notion that a soul is older, meaning more experienced at incarnation? C: The human perspective is the place where this idea begins. Immediately upon return home, it becomes nearly instantly obvious which human attitudes prevail to one human and to many others, as absolute truth, but do not apply. Access to your true home is, by your design and choice, highly restricted and mostly erased from conscious memory and recall. Q: Twin flames? C: Simply souls who incarnate to meet as humans, to form a relationship, most often perceived as romantic. Q: Soul mates? C: Another version of twin flame. It could be debated whether "financial abundance" is or is not a new age buzzword, but I believe it's mentioned fairly often in such circles. In any event, several days ago a reader mentioned it here in a comment. Given the term's encroachment into economics, a topic to which I have sometimes invested attention (...cough, cough...) I put questions to The Committee.
Q: Esteemed Committee, the term means having enough money to acquire what one wants or needs, at will. Correct? C: Superficially yes, on the surface or judging by appearance but it means something different in practice, when examined more closely. Q: What does it represent? C: Several things, sometimes a combination of such things for some people. Naiveté, avarice, greed, frustration, worry and great opportunity. Q: Please explain each of these words, if you could. C: What is available requires knowledge and access. To become convinced that ice from Antarctic glaciers will cure disease can cause the sensation of lack, but such product is unavailable away from Antarctica, the cost thus selling price would be astronomical as humans often say. This silly example repeats in many places for many products not interpreted as silly. It is naiveté which oftentimes underlies the desire for a product commonly available yet deemed expensive. Q: How does avarice relate to financial abundance? C: This is fear of sharing, a viewpoint of scarcity. S/he who hoards, begets more hoarding in both her/himself and surrounding observers. Everything physical a human could require is abundantly available on Earth, and the availability is ongoing. Nearly permanent but for changing and evolving wants, desires and preferences. Q: Okay, what about being greedy? C: This is avarice extended to acquisition. Nearly all of you have seen examples or practiced it. Q: Frustration? C: This is much the same as envy of physical items. To want but not have. Q: I believe worry is the biggest piece of the financial abundance puzzle. C: If it were puzzling, but it is not. You are correct about size, because controlling the future is elusive for all humans in adolescence and older. Q: Please unpack the "great opportunity" part of financial abundance. C: Money requires the products or services first be available then the cash be acceptable. Everyone who might desire financial abundance really means desire for availability, often promptly delivered. The willingness to produce then offer something arises from confidence, encouragement and trust. These conditions in humans come about only voluntarily; such perceptions only sustain when rules, regulations and control are reduced then withdrawn. The great opportunity presents itself to leadership, who can select control from which self-benefit is the main result, or freedom for their constituency. Q: We must choose leadership carefully. C: Not required; choose leadership on this simple basis: will leaders listen to all constituents, who will disagree regularly and sometimes vehemently OR will leaders perpetuate control? For on Earth today, all of you toil under excessive unnecessary control. Shall it continue or likely increase or reduce? Financial abundance is a seductive illusion. True abundance arrives when it is not pursued. Q: Thank you, Esteemed Committee. C: Our pleasure as always. Readers ask about more terms, phrases and things.
Committee comes up: just consider what is already known.
If Earth were indeed flat, the answers become impossible. I consult The Committee anyway, because the real question is: why does anybody suggest it? C: "Much confusion, thus distraction, is created. By doing so, it becomes much easier to float other false distractions as truth. Belief motivates humans. The objective is to deceive many people into supporting things, such as global warming climate change, by way of generating discussions and uncertainties about something as ridiculous as a flat planet. The false but more reasonable sound of the objective is far easier to digest once the populace is accustomed to seeing ridiculousness. The active, voluminous discussions & attention about & given to homosexual marriage, transgenderism and fringe social topics, which shall directly involve only small single digit percentages of the population, serve to make the more insidious change easier among the larger, critical mass portions of human populations." ==================================================== RQ: I read an article today about NASA pushing the manned moon landing back until 2026. I was under the impression that we (humans) no longer had the capability/technology to safely cross the Van Allen belt. From what I remember, we accidentally stumbled upon that 'technology' from a crashed alien craft but no longer have that capability/technology today. I would appreciate your input on this topic. Thank you. A: We humans have had the technology to protect against radiation since very shortly after discovering what radiation is, i.e. radioactive particles. The challenge is weight; a manned spacecraft with sufficiently thick lead shielding (or other very heavy metal) would not be able to achieve orbit, given rocket booster technology of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Our rockets have not gotten much more powerful since then, but mostly more efficient. (Automobiles are similar; a current large Chevrolet vehicle significantly outweighs a Cadillac from the 1960s, but with "only" a 5.3 liter engine. The "Caddy" six decades ago had a 7 liter then a 7.7 liter guzzler under the hood but made less power than the modern General Motors 5.3 engine. In a drag race, the Chevrolet of today at 2600 kg would show its taillights pretty quickly to the 7.7 liter, 2,000 kg Cadillac .) The Committee says the postponement of the mission is for both political and scientific reasons; the ongoing process to develop light enough radiation shielding material is half of the reason given to project staff & leaders, and is correct. The other half is political, the risk of bad publicity and the effect that might have on the election in November of this year. RQ: So if lead is too heavy, what did they use to protect the astronauts for the manned moon missions in the 60's? A: Investigators discovered inside crashed alien ET vessels or ships, many items, materials and devices, among them a foil made from an unknown alloy and elements, which do not exist on Earth. The foil blocks high intensity radiation better than 30cm/12 in thick lead, with the weight of aluminum foil and twice the thickness (30 microns) of typical aluminum foil (15 microns) sold at a supermarket. The problem became removing and installing it again and again; we can't repair it by, for example, by melting it down and recycling it. We don't have this element on Earth, thus do not know its properties and would risk losing all of it. Using it to shield a returning capsule that passes through the Van Allen Belts to re-enter the atmosphere, where the exterior surfaces get really, really hot, especially across the ceramic heat shield (even a small gap in foil coverage could allow enough radiation to enter and seriously injure or kill the astronauts) then splashing down on the ocean's surface? Plus removal and re-attachment to a new space capsule? All that work took its toll on the stuff. We don't have any more of it; no other nation does. No more manned missions above the Van Allen Belts have occurred in a half century. A reader question in the comments brought about an answer too long for that page, in my opinion.
================================================================================== RQ: So would this be mainly back-to-back incarnations in the same family, to continue a task started but not finished with the souls left behind in the flesh, so to speak? C: It can be, but no, the sequence does not have to be, or is not required to be, or isn’t scheduled the way you describe, for the majority of instances which might be included in what the question describes. RQ: For example, the great grandfather that comes back as his great grandson, like e.g. died in 2018 and born again in 2021? C: This is possible and has been done. RQ: Or could there even be overlaps such as being born e.g. only five months after one’s death? C: Overlaps are not possible for humans but yes in Heaven. RQ: What would that mean for the baby in the mother’s womb, would there be a soul holding the place while waiting for the other soul to leave the dying body and be free to take its place in the new body? C: In Heaven babies do not exist, because humans do not exist. Time does not exist; a soul is not able to wait, because doing so requires the passage of time. Time does not exist; it is an Earth surface illusion. For the purpose of answering your question, no; no soul is obligated to wait for anything where time does not exist. The human body is subject to time, therefore souls who wish to use a human body become subject to the restrictions and limitations time creates. Souls can leave a body and have another soul enter and take over the life contract, although rare, but any soul can enter any body not occupied or used by another soul, with permission of all souls involved. This is easy to do mechanically, because your soul departs your body nearly every time you sleep, and almost one hundred percent of the time you sleep for many hours, such as overnight. The process of departure and return, for sleeping overnight, is no more easy or difficult physically than final soul departure, or first entry. Allow us a comparison; it is physically no more easy or difficult to shoot a water pistol into the face of the prime minister during a meeting of government ministers, than to shoot the water stream into the face of one’s friend during a party. Knowledge of circumstances and consequences matter greatly. RQ: And if either of these two options in the example were possible, what would that mean for the soul of the great grandfather, would it still be there for the souls of the other older family members when they return home or even during their lifetimes, as support from the other side of the veil, so to speak? C: We shall speak to incarnation from the perspective of Heaven and your soul, explaining again what we have already done, as some readers might recall. We ask that you envision the spoked wheel of a bicycle. Each spoke represents a sequence of events in which a soul participates. This wheel has thousands of spokes, and one of them, possibly two, are incarnations in a certain place or upon a certain planet. The spokes are often connected by small segments attached to two or more, which run perpendicular to the spokes. These small pieces are human life contracts and experiences. You may create a life agreement, and place another small segment of either a spoke, or a connecting piece attached to both running between them. You can approach and review any one of these pieces, and you can look at the spoke from the wheel center or from the outer rim towards the center hub. The spokes and segments between them represent Earth time, which for you on the surface of your planet, are fixed, permanent and always progressing in the same direction. Your soul neither has nor needs such restrictions; time does not exist for your soul. Incarnation can be planned and carried out just as your example postulates, or in any other combination, always subject to the limits a human body and the Earth surface environment place upon a body. RQ: Hope these questions make sense, but I have often wondered about that. C: Do you hope to say that you would like the questions to generate answers you will like, or with which you will agree? Making sense as humans say these words, often means that. How much or little sense we have made turns on your interpretation of our replies. Overall, what we wish to say is, souls cannot create a body without agreement from two other souls who agree to be parents and perform the biological function or process to create the body the incoming soul will occupy. Two souls may inhabit the same body, but this is never done against the will of the one soul or the other. Humans call this schizophrenia or multiple personality disorder. It is uncommon because of the freedom from time constraints makes it unnecessary. Your soul can incarnate in the Earth's Roman Empire, or during Atlantis, or two thousand years from now and in any order. The human sequence does not apply away from or off Earth. This ease of placement makes the purpose of dual or triple occupation of a body meaningless, unless all souls involved, all incarnated family for example, agree to do it because a specific and beneficial task, lesson and mission will result, which could not be done otherwise." Playing hooky is mid to late 20th century (and earlier) American slang for skipping school, being away from classes without permission. If incarnation aboard Earth is schooling & education, could that make a soul's absence from our true home a form of "playing hooky" or, the other way around? The phrase probably came from the Dutch word "hoekje" for the game of hide & seek. Do we incarnate to temporarily hide from ourselves, in order to seek experience, knowledge and understanding we cannot otherwise get without playing the Earth game?
|