|
A reader sent a two-paragraph excerpt (probably) from something; I have asked The Committee to interpret and comment.
I've broken up and repeated the excerpt or quote in underlined italics, The Committee's observations and comments follow in bold color. ================================= Interpretations of some holy book references are serious departures from universal realities. To which human religious scripture does this remark refer? Many exist and as many and we say even more, have been lost; large differences are to be found among and between them, thus we suggest this statement be compared against the scripture and teachings of the religion with which one is familiar. More important we say, is to state that a departure is serious. This is an example of human manipulative language; better would it be to say interpretations represent large differences. How serious or otherwise is most subjective, thus nearly without meaning when applied or seen across mankind on Earth. Departure suggests an intended path, planned course and ideal route from which someone has strayed. Equally possible is that the different interpretation, the "serious departure" as it is, represents the main, majority or generally ideal path, that the holy book is the departure. No such thing exists as a universal reality, but for the limited, dimmed human view of existence, compared to the human soul and its place in your natural home, what humans call Heaven. Your soul creates its reality; the human body inside the three-dimensional limits into which you have chosen to travel, has a much more limited ability to immediately influence what is called reality. Human thought is the power of your mind, and retains the same power it always has, before you chose a human voyage, but operates more slowly because the three-dimensional environment must also operate more slowly; otherwise, the environment you perceive, would not exist. The slowed perception thus creation in which humans exist, was produced precisely to provide the experience all humans now have. Reality seems to be outside your control, and to be common to all humans. This is not always true and applies not to every human aboard Earth. For instance, the serpent that tempted Eve to eat fruit from the forbidden tree is considered by some religious scholars to represent God’s opposite, the devil or Satan. The story is allegory. The creation of an evil force is a manipulation technique and tool. There is no devil or Satan and God has no opposite. This is correct. Similarly, darkness isn’t the opposite of light, it is the absence of light; This is conceptually accurate; however, the absence of light is not possible. What occurs is a slowing of light's travel and a lessening or a reduction of the amount of light. Dimness, not darkness, would be a better human English word for what this sentence attempts to say. .....and hatred isn’t the opposite of love, it is the absence of love. The only hatred which exists is self-hatred; thus to say an absence of love creates hatred is to say, absence of oneself. If you yourself were absent, how could you feel, have or project hate? Love is always and everywhere but is sometimes and, in some places, temporarily slowed and reduced from entering the space and sphere of certain people, by their personal design, choice and desire. Often unaware are such souls that such decision was made by them at the level of their soul. Humans in this instance often fall into the language habit of saying "subconscious" which likewise does not and cannot exist. What is part of conscious existence is not sub— anything, simply temporarily inaccessible or unavailable, either partially or completely. This human language phrase, to call something the subconscious, is similar to the inaccurate idea a higher self exists. There is only love-light, the energy that is cosmic consciousness and the most powerful force in the universe. We say not that it is the most powerful; how much energy, force or power is involved depends entirely upon its use. A human weapon, a tool designed for the application of strong or even lethal physical force, is not powerful until used; it is an inert, harmless object which shall do nothing until a human chooses to act and use it. Cosmic consciousness is not of the cosmos, it is of you, always and everywhere. It is the main force of existence, in the universe and the other eight of them. Creator/Creation is the only source of that energy and the energy is the only “substance” from which anything has ever come and shall forevermore. Yes, this is accurate and to it we add the detail that YOU are creation and part of the creator.
11 Comments
Today is Sunday 29 September, the aforementioned week has passed, and I trust all readers who wanted to have a look at the two articles, have done so. As can be seen in the comments, several questions were asked.
The Committee speaks to the two articles: C: The manufacture of plastics is well understood on Earth, any human interested can study petrochemical processes to learn how, if not already known and understood. The presence of microscopically small particles of human manufactured plastic is now what humans might call ubiquitous; found nearly everywhere. The negative physical effects which have and shall come to Earth life forms is negligible, the risk is accumulation but the process of physical breakdown into the microscopic sizes, often smaller than even viruses, almost completely prevents accumulation of risky amounts in organisms. Plants and animals both ingest these materials, the risk higher for the latter, not as much with the former. Food and water are the principal path of entry into the human and animal body. Disease risk is very low, as we shall explain. Chemicals used to produce, and also mixed in as additives to create certain properties in plastics, are principally released when plastics are heated to temperatures impossible to occur naturally inside a human body. Such temperatures would kill any plant or animal long before released chemicals could do this, however the tiny, miniscule amounts of the plastics which enter and remain hidden inside an organism, ensure that such chemical release would be so small where it could even occur, that no direct harm would result. Production and use of plastic on Earth will be sharply reduced, when Earth crust petroleum is produced in much lower amounts than currently extracted, as this liquid is the base material from which the manufacturing process begins. Other organic materials fermented to produce ethyl alcohol then ethylene, the base material for nearly all plastics, will not be grown in sufficient quantities to come anywhere near the quantities of plastic currently manufactured. Microplastic particles will remain in the Earth surface environment for some time, far beyond the lifetimes of even the grandchildren of you who read this website. Species dysphoria is a fad and speaks more to social pressure than personal discomfort with the human body form. No soul incarnates as a human being unintentionally. This is to say, no soul misunderstands her or his human choice or decision, when making and taking it, to a point or degree s/he will regret the decision once incarnated and prefer to be an animal instead. What can happen and is also often planned as a life contract phase in such people who wish to present themselves as an animal, is an experiment to pretend s/he is an animal in the physical, thus entitled to display behavior consistent with that species. All observers can see clearly, the person doing so is still a person, no matter how much barking, roaring, meowing or wing-flapping s/he pretends to practice. The social message and greater purposes served, are similar to and very closely related to human gender dysphoria; much effort is made to impose acceptance upon observers, who do not have, because they have never voluntarily assumed the obligation, to treat a ten-year young boy as if he were a bald eagle or to accept a fe/male as the opposite. The greater trend is resistance to thought control, which is impossible. Human thoughts are controlled by the human mind, only. If some humans can curtail expressions of thoughts, such controller humans gain more general control of resources and wealth, thus social control. Species and gender dysphoria, occurring in a microscopically tiny percentage of the human population, are opportunistically seized to achieve a greater end; train humans to accept choices most, nearly all humans did not make and do not prefer. ========================= On 22 September 2024 I wrote: A reader sends links to interesting topics. It occurred to me many readers might want to submit questions in advance, so here are the articles. Click on each button to bring up the article, then offer questions in the comments. I'll give this a week, then have The Committee answer. No "terrifying reason" is offered (probably click-bait) but the video is worth watching, nevertheless.  A reader asks:
Covid-19 immunizations using the latest formulation are now being administered. My question:
Responds The Committee: Safe you must define, for human life is not safe, if this must mean the utter absence of harm or danger which might bring them. Human life is a risk. What safe ultimately means for any one person, is whether something will happen to her/him, or to a person about whom s/he cares. Probabilities and rates of occurrence are for others, until one becomes a positive statistic. The true question of probability loses meaning after the risk or danger has passed, whether something has not happened or indeed did occur. The probability of any one recipient of the injection to suffer negative effects, is not as low as would be hoped. To this point, we suggest any person still giving consideration to receiving an mRNA injection, should consider how no wide or even narrow public release of confirmed data has been offered; to the contrary, as many of you know, the follow-up on bad effects, including deaths, has not been made by governments or authorities who first compelled or ordered in many cases, the administration of these injections. No test results have been divulged to determine immunity following; how effective are the injections at preventing contraction of the disease intended stopped? No mRNA injection is risk free and never shall be; the human immune system cannot be properly stimulated genetically; it does not operate in reverse. Allow us a simple comparison, the automobile. The wheels are turned by a motor connected to them, moving the car to which the wheels are attached. Can the road be moved underneath a vehicle, which shall certainly turn the wheels? Yes, in theory, in the way a fan blade moves the air or that same air can blow upon thus move the blades of a fan. Can the ocean be made to move to turn the propeller of a ship? Yes, in theory also. Will the moving road or water accomplish the objective, propel the car or boat to a new location? Moving a road underneath a car is far more difficult, effectively impossible, if the goal is to travel from one fixed place to another, along that normally stationary road surface. The solution or cure to a viral infection in a human or animal body, is to either eliminate a virus or prevent its reproduction, to evade any sickness from it, or to allow the human immunity response system to knock down the virus reproduction process. The target of an assassin's rifle cannot effectively aim the weapon for the shooter; the target is some distance away. Mr. Trump was not able to guide the sighting telescope atop the would-be killer's rifle. The human body's immune system cannot be effectively stimulated by a specific modification to human DNA. Your friends from around the galaxy know of ways to stop a viral infection from spreading to the degree sickness is caused in the body of the person into which the virus has entered. Elimination of all viruses would mean the end of life on Earth, so this cannot be done, not on any planet where biosystems have viruses. Chemical methods exist on other planets which stop a virus from replication, but the technology is both far above human scientific knowledge and its use on Earth by Visitors From Other Worlds, no different from blatant, prohibited interference into human life and societies. Overall, we suggest avoidance of the injections and good focus on human bodily health, a subject already well covered and understood by humans. This is the design / drawing / circle from 8th August, more elaborate now. (The video of the first version follows below.) The color of the crops has changed, and apparently humans have come and placed a few stones in the center. Does anyone, especially readers in the UK, know of any media organization that reports on these designs? Look how close the houses are —less than a ½ mile I'd say— but either nobody heard or saw what did this, or will not speak of it. Have no reporters dared go to those houses to ask around? Given the deliberate ignorance of crop designs, it is no wonder at all so many folks doubt anything about Alien ETs.
I repeat a reader comment with a question within (bold regular type green) RQ: I found the statement recently about differences between Islam and Judaism, as well as the lack of tolerance an interesting point to reflect upon. I wonder if TC would say something about what about these two religions are we to learn and better understand from humanity's perspective? I know those who practice both religions and they are all lovely people with great ethics and integrity. But why can't these two religions coexist peacefully? Will this ever happen? Surely, we have something to learn from both sides, but one is not better or right than the other at the end of the day. This comment reminds me of an old joke I've told here before, but shall repeat anyway, to the annoyance of some readers. Somebody dies, arrives at Heaven's Pearly Gates, is asked about personal religious association, gets looked up on the registry, is admitted then sent to a specific religion room, with a request to be quiet passing the door immediately to the right. Arriving soul #2 is admitted including the religion question, with the same request for quiet, then #3 and so forth. After a dozen new arrivals have entered, along comes an atheist agnostic, proudly declaring religious doubt and indecision, who asks why everyone should be quiet passing that first door; St. Peter replies: "That’s the Catholic Room, they think they're the only ones here." (I was baptized a Roman Catholic, by the way. I have not abdicated, pursued much worship, committed apostacy or been ex-communicated, yet.) The Committee speaks on this topic: "Words use, we do not normally but with humans often yes, and this moment is one of such. Muslims and Jews tolerate each other now, but it is not universal. Nearly all attention from outsiders-to-a-conflict is directed at same; the far larger majorities who tolerate one another, are not given much if any, human attention. Would it not be far better to accept, instead of tolerate? The last word of the most recent sentence we have offered, means in human English: to put up with something that would probably not be chosen or would be sent away or left behind, if the tolerator could have preference. Inside the nation of Israel, Jews, Muslims and other religions not only tolerate but accept each other's existence and presence. Could Israeli Jews rid themselves of Israeli Muslim citizens, if the far larger Jewish majority in Israel wished to do this? Look at the war now in motion for the answer, which you already knew is yes. Do Israeli Jews simply tolerate Muslim fellow citizens, or accept them? The ability Israeli Muslims have to follow non-Hebrew religions, communicate in Arabic and avoid anything Jewish answers the question. Your question, dear Reader, asks if this can be extended across the nations where the majority of populations are Muslim. Let us look at the other end of the scale, societies where both Muslims and Jews live, but both groups are small minorities compared to far larger Christian majorities; we offer Great Britain, France, Canada and the USA as examples. No assistance or comment need we make; any of you can examine these places also and conclude as you wish. Essentially, no need exists in these nations for a Christian majority to force religious minorities to get along. Arab Muslims and Jews can and do get along peacefully, but also attack and counterattack one another. The attackers are usually Muslim, the counterattacks Jewish. The attacks are ugly, the counterattacks uglier. The Muslims maintain that Jews are thieves and intruders, the Jews claim self-defence and preservation, and cite pre-emptive offensive strikes as good defence. You who are not a Jew or a Muslim or an Arab, can assist by casting aside the doublespeak used to manipulate; too often are used the terms coexist and tolerance. These are tricks used to twist you. All things coexist, this means nothing about getting along, being peaceful or accepting one another. Nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen and oxygen coexist. If combined in certain proportions, they produce a new chemical named nitroglycerine; this is dynamite. The elements still coexist peacefully in the explosive mixture, until a spark or other ignition point is supplied. Stop using this word, when referring to groups who are at odds. The next strong suggestion we have, is to stop using the word tolerance in place of acceptance, which are two most different things. Tolerance emphasizes differences, disputes, disagreements and doubts. Acceptance lessens them. You who are told to be tolerant are being told to be submissive, subservient, staid and stupid. This is the handiwork of the HCPs. As to the conflict, war, mass death and widespread killing of humans by humans now happening inside and close to Israel, we suggest two things:
|
