What the heck is a mantissa, a secret species of Antarctic snake? An Australian polar bear? A Canadian palm tree? ![]()
![]()
Reader comments & questions with remarks and answers from The Committee, once again a bit long for the comments I think.
================================================ If Earth-like planets are uncommon, fortunately there exists silicon-based life that maybe is viable on much different planets. C: How similar or different a planet might be when compared aspect by aspect, is not correlated with the chemistry of life which thrives there. The principal difference humans would see is color; plants on Earth are generally green, and this is one of several possibilities with a carbon based chemical structure. As the many of you know, plants of much different colors also grow on Earth, where all life has a carbon basis. Typically silicon based plant life is red, and animal life is green. Humans are red, or brown as humans would say. My questions are concerning our universe and limited to our galaxy. What ratio is there between exclusive carbon based, exclusive silicon based and also mixed between the two, inhabited planets ? I somehow feel a 40/50/10 ratio, don't know why. C: Your question refers to planets with life, for many exist without life and the lifeless ones also have chemical structure and a basis of carbon, silicon and other substances also not found on Earth. For planets with life, the carbon based forms are about one quarter of the total, mixed between both is about one in ten and two thirds are just silicon based life. Your assessment is somewhat accurate, and you "knew" this because you were hearing it from your Guardian Angel Guides. Does carbon-based life thrive on planets environmentally much different from Earth? Here on Earth we have extremophile bacteria, so maybe carbon life could be found on planets deemed inhospitable by our current knowledge. [For readers unfamiliar with the word, such as myself; extremophile means a microorganism, especially an archaean (existed many hundreds of millions of years ago) that lives in conditions of extreme temperature, acidity, alkalinity, or chemical concentration.] C: Both carbon and silicon based life exists on planets vastly different environmentally compared to Earth Is it true that silicon-based life is more able to adapt to wider range of environments than carbon based? C: Yes, the reason is because silicon-based compounds are less likely to combine with other chemicals and elements. On Earth the typical process is oxidation. Is there a third group of life forms based on a different element than carbon or silicon in our galaxy? C: Third, fourth up to a tenth with regard to complex organisms, what humans would call bugs, insects and larger. Microorganisms exist in several dozen different base chemical structures, approximately one third with chemicals or elements which do not exist on Earth. A bit too long for the comments section, I think.
========================================= 1. I remember Erik [Medhus, ChannelingErik.com] said we all had "soul families" in Heaven and The Committee mentioned the same. I'm wondering what would be the average number of family members we have? I'm thinking also that the good friends I have had in my life are some of them. Funny, three of them had the same name, Diane. I wonder if there is any significance or just coincidence? C: This answer turns on the personal definition of family. In Heaven families do not exist as these are formed on Earth; marriages, childbirth and death do not occur. No spouses, siblings or parents exist. How far away or close to you soulmates are, determines group size; it can be large or small at any instant. All varieties, options and sizes exist. There is no average. Names are for humans, we do not use them in Heaven. Think of all the animals on Earth which do not use names either but form family groups. Gorillas, orcas and wolves are but three examples among a large number of species. Good friends in human life are almost always from souls with whom you already have a close friendship. 1a. What does it mean if you don't have many friends in this life? Does that mean you don't have a soul family :( C: Two questions here; human life is not the result of a soul’s existence, position and place in Heaven at all, unless a soul wants this, but such decision is rare, extremely rare. All souls are members of large groups compared to human circles of friends. Few friends in a human life represents a life plan choice; it can be temporary or otherwise and is easily changed. 2. For so many years I pictured Heaven as being above, I think in the 5th dimension? and now I learn that we ARE in Heaven which surrounds us. That's a new one for me and is confusing after all these years. I know if we could see in the spirit we would see our angels. That being said, would we see other souls around also or just when they come to visit us like deceased relatives and friends or souls that we knew in Heaven prior to incarnating? C: In Heaven you can see things that do not exist on Earth, plus everything which does. Souls who once lived as a relative often visit returnees; in practice in almost every case, as you will visit souls with whom you have lived as a human when they return home to Heaven. Your soulmates who return to greet you in Heaven will only seem as if they have been gone for a few hours, or a maximum one day, as a human perceives the passage of time. 3. It's amazing to learn that there are so many souls waiting to "fill our shoes." How did we make it here before so many others? (I don't feel that special :) Maybe that's where "life plans" come into play. And if incarnated lives are like spokes in a wheel, you would think there would be room enough. I guess not here on one planet at the same time. (Maybe I just answered my own question.) C: Who comes before and who comes after, requires time; in Heaven this does not exist. For more candidates than spots, the larger group votes to select which among them shall incarnate; the life plans involve many things including interactions with other souls, so the groups from which souls will form human relationships and connections, reduce the total number by a good amount. If twenty family members among children, siblings, parents, cousins and nieces and nephews are involved on average, this reduced the eight billion elections twenty-fold. Ample space for many more humans is available on Earth, most of the planet’s surface is unoccupied. 4. I've read so many books and been to so many sites, sometimes they run together so I may ask something that's been posted before. I think I read here there are 9 universes? In them, is earth the only planet that exists like ours or are there others like earth with humans like us or one or the other? C: Yes, nine exist. Many planets exist among the nine universes which are like Earth, hundreds of thousands. Earth-like worlds are not common in your galaxy but is found in tens of thousands of places in your universe. ![]()
![]()
I do not keep track of prediction accuracy, but readers here do and sometimes inform me. The challenge is, requests for predictions & forecasts often involve criminality, innocence, guilt, motives and details. I always draw silence on such questions.
Some readers, through the Contact Page, have sent messages suggesting I do get such answers but play games here with website readership, pretending I don't. From the point-of-view of the Professional Skeptic . . . (definition: the fearful observer who dares not believe things new, from fear s/he might look weak yet also enjoys opportunities to express doubt, the purpose to generate feelings of self-strength by placing oneself above, thus superior to, offered new information) . . . this is logical, but untrue. I draw blanks on such questions and The Committee have, do and probably will always tell me that I am blocked from receiving such information to protect me, and readers who might get that information and overall, the process and development of the inquired incident, matter or event. The Committee adds that often when and where no beneficial purpose is served by knowing the unknown, silence reigns supreme. Uncovering what humans shall eventually find out or should never know, for the purposes of the incident and involved souls, cannot be violated. Back to keeping score; a reader offered the following questions:
Responds The Committee: 1) Yes 2) Yes, but not in Slovakia or involving this nation 3) Observe and discover; the outcome is already known and is the reason the attack took place however, the route and process are not yet selected from among the many paths available to reach the destination towards which this event is pointed and aimed. Recent events around the world include an eclipse, torrential rainfall and devastating floods in east Texas and Brazil (city of Porto Alegre, State of Rio Grande do Sul) a geomagnetic storm still happening now, causing rare aurora australis and borealis effects far inside the 45th parallels (midway between Earth’s poles and equator), not to mention earthquakes such as today between Mexico and Guatemala, or near New York City recently.
Is the shift progressing or even occurring and moreover, are these events related as the post’s title suggests? Q: Esteemed Committee, that last sentence is a question; is what I suggest & ask, true? C: That you have thought of it as a question means yes. All the geophysical events you have mentioned are part of The Shift, as this time on Earth has come to be called. Q: Is there a point to this perspective and should anybody make the effort to (warning: sarcastic American slang about to occur…) edumacate & edumicate fellow world citizens? C: Double yes, however frustration will, as you already know, come along for the process. Q: My guess is, shift events are going to become obvious only in hindsight, just as happens with economic analysis. A recession must already be underway for 6 months at least, to be identified. Y’all have said before that The Shift is going to require about three decades; how far along are we? One quarter the distance, or say, half? C: Approximately one fifth, and we emphasize twenty percent as inaccurately approximate; the finish line as humans might like and shall soon desperately wish to know, requires a calendar. The occurrence, development and ongoing effects are still subject to human influence, intervention and to a small degree, control. These opportunities remain in place but are unlikely to be recognized much less explored by a material portion of mankind, a large enough part or humanity to achieve critical mass. Thus the finish line cannot be fixed, thus percentage of progress is also approximate. Q: Assuming we have four fifths remaining, we could be finished in four fifths of three decades, or 24 years. Okay, our start would be 2018 but can we establish a starting date at some point, once a pattern can be identified? C: No, because the events have always occurred on Earth, even long before the shift. Doubters and disbelievers will be the loudest, adding uncertainty out of proportion to their percentages. Q: Atlantis attracted the comet which brought about its destruction, even though it could be seen in telescopes for quite some time before impact. The tsunamis which washed over Earth, especially eastern North America and Western Europe, did even more damage. Are we humans able to draw such energy to ourselves, again? Is The Shift going to be a wipeout such as with the demise of Atlantis? C: Double no. The detonation of nuclear weapons in Japan, the USA’s civil war, the extermination of millions and millions of people by Germans and Russians, the Khmer Rouge killings in southeast Asia, to name but a few recent human events, were far more likely, with their enormous negative energy, to bring about such an event but did not. Q: Mucho talk abounds lately that Alien ETs will become more widely known over the remainder of this decade. C: Belief in existence will grow, widespread awareness of the topic already exists; this has been done intentionally to prepare the masses of humanity for brainwashing about Visitors-To-Earth, to create widespread fear, worry and concern. The growth in belief has already increased and will gain momentum much as does a falling tree, and yes this will develop over the next several years. How developed will belief become depends on human reactions and interactions with visitors and one another. Human invitation and human response to the acceptance of invitations are what shall determine the pace and pulse of the process. Q: Our visitor friends are aware of The Shift? C: It is having effects on one and all beings in the galaxy. Q: Thank you, Esteemed Committee. C: You welcome are. I struggled then gave up creating a good title for this post. Before addressing the topic of the day, allow me to frame it with 3 (three) contextual examples:
1) Many times, the topic of global climate warming change (GCWC) has been treated and discussed here. Missing from general discussion & debate in the press, at least from what I’ve read & heard, are basic science concepts. Ironic is this because supporters of climate change social policy, mRNA injections and several other things often implore folks to “follow the science.” Established, irrefutable science concepts involved with GCWC include:
Proponents say human activity creates excess “greenhouse gas” and higher average atmospheric temperatures, but the above five bullet points never enter the discussion. 2) A reader recently suggested first seeing photos of Alien ET Visitors-To-Earth, would be preferable to encountering them face-to-face without advance notice. The likelihood of crossing paths, however, for nearly every human, is very close to zero. A few dozen of them and 8 billion of us? 3) Russia invaded Ukraine 2 years and a few months ago; its military forces remain, unrestricted in what they can do, when and where. The tone and tenor of press reports, not to mention the USA’s free-for-all splurge of USD 130 billion, suggest somehow Ukraine will repel and eject the invaders. What is the definition of conquered, anyway? The presence of a hostile, foreign army for 27 months straight, able to operate as it pleases, probably fits. Often an answer is directly ahead, if facts & knowledge we already have are applied and considered. This leads to today’s post, involving another truth meter type question for which I deeply thank the reader who asked. I am not clever enough to think of this stuff on my own, unsupervised and loose on the streets. =============================== On the Matthew Books [web]site: "The common concept of the planet’s interior, which is various kinds of rock, ores and crystals, petroleum, water, magma and natural gas, is far from complete. In addition to those natural elements are thousands of miles of tunnel systems. Some were built during the past century, but deeper within Earth are ancient tunnels that contain technology beyond your imagining, and highly evolved civilizations live in modest communities and magnificent cities. Those members of the universal family will introduce themselves when life on the surface is peaceful, and the spectacular tunnels with astounding technology also will become known."
The excellent 3 questions about the quoted passage beg the thought, why aren’t such obvious things already addressed on the Matthew Books website? The questions also assume such civilizations exist. Back to the facts and knowledge humans have already developed. Humans already create tunnels thousands of meters below Earth’s dry land surface, for crude oil and natural gas production. Many of these tunnels are horizontal or diagonal, this technique is called horizontal drilling. Humans have been taking crude oil out of the ground since the later 19th century; as methods and equipment have improved drastically, to include doing it under the sea floor deep into the oceans, we have learned a lot about what subsurface conditions exist. As soon as drilling started to go deeper, made much easier by the invention of a special drill bit, it was learned that temperatures and pressure increase with depth just as occurs in water. Because the ground is solid, the increases are greater than in bodies of water. Crude oil usually comes to the surface of a several thousand feet deep hole at or above 100 Centigrade and that’s after the trip up the casing of the wellbore has cooled it off somewhat. Modern sensors inform the temperature inside the "net pay" or top & bottom of the stone sponge where crude oil lies. Moreover, the volume of a hole drilled, considering the depth and diameter of a well bore, has to be precisely planned, and the weight of the drilling fluid carefully calculated and adjusted so its weight thus downward pressures are sufficient to prevent gas and oil under high pressure, from pushing up to the surface. As natural gas rises unrestricted from thousands of feet below, it speeds up a lot. Think of the pressure like a bullet in a rifle barrel. The arrival of uncontrolled hot gas and oil at the surface will resemble an explosion, become ignited and cause a spectacular fire called a blow-out. It’s a disaster as tons and tons of gray mud are also spit out at high pressure and temperature. Conditions for any life form we can imagine are inhospitable below the surface, more and more so the deeper a tunnel would go. Even surface air piped in would become superheated; the risk of shifting rock and collapse would be instantly fatal. "Making hole" as would be said in the oil patch, to say, five thousand feet can encounter troubles, such as sand layers or aquifers that suck drilling fluid sideways and delay the process or cost too much to remedy or stop the drilling of that well for good. Tunnels through which anything close to a human in size could pass are far larger than the typical 40 inch or 1m diameter hole used for a hydrocarbon well. This also increases the risk a lot. A city? I cannot guesstimate how many wells humans have drilled worldwide thousands of feet into the surface, but mostly on dry land. If the tunnels in the questions exist, why has one never been encountered? Without even counting water wells, in the USA alone more than 4 million oil wells have been drilled since 1880. The point I wish to make is: apparent mysteries do not require a psychic medium in some cases, and this was one, but no harm or foul was intended or perceived by asking. General human willingness to believe fascinating things good and bad, without checking against known facts and differing perspectives on such data, feed the HCPs and their minions, our self-labeled overlords of control. |