No "terrifying reason" is offered (probably click-bait) but the video is worth watching, nevertheless.

A reader asks:
 
Covid-19 immunizations using the latest formulation are now being administered. My question:

1. Are these vaccines safe?
2. If not, can we assume that any future Covid vaccines are also not safe?

 
Responds The Committee:
 
Safe you must define, for human life is not safe, if this must mean the utter absence of harm or danger which might bring them. Human life is a risk. What safe ultimately means for any one person, is whether something will happen to her/him, or to a person about whom s/he cares. 

Probabilities and rates of occurrence are for others, until one becomes a positive statistic. 

The true question of probability loses meaning after the risk or danger has passed, whether something has not happened or indeed did occur.
 
The probability of any one recipient of the injection to suffer negative effects, is not as low as would be hoped. To this point, we suggest any person still giving consideration to receiving an mRNA injection, should consider how no wide or even narrow public release of confirmed data has been offered; to the contrary, as many of you know, the follow-up on bad effects, including deaths, has not been made by governments or authorities who first compelled or ordered in many cases, the administration of these injections. No test results have been divulged to determine immunity following; how effective are the injections at preventing contraction of the disease intended stopped?
 
No mRNA injection is risk free and never shall be; the human immune system cannot be properly stimulated genetically; it does not operate in reverse. Allow us a simple comparison, the automobile. The wheels are turned by a motor connected to them, moving the car to which the wheels are attached. Can the road be moved underneath a vehicle, which shall certainly turn the wheels? Yes, in theory, in the way a fan blade moves the air or that same air can blow upon thus move the blades of a fan.

Can the ocean be made to move to turn the propeller of a ship? Yes, in theory also. Will the moving road or water accomplish the objective, propel the car or boat to a new location? Moving a road underneath a car is far more difficult, effectively impossible, if the goal is to travel from one fixed place to another, along that normally stationary road surface. 

The solution or cure to a viral infection in a human or animal body, is to either eliminate a virus or prevent its reproduction, to evade any sickness from it, or to allow the human immunity response system to knock down the virus reproduction process.
 
The target of an assassin's rifle cannot effectively aim the weapon for the shooter; the target is some distance away. Mr. Trump was not able to guide the sighting telescope atop the would-be killer's rifle.
 
The human body's immune system cannot be effectively stimulated by a specific modification to human DNA.
 
Your friends from around the galaxy know of ways to stop a viral infection from spreading to the degree sickness is caused in the body of the person into which the virus has entered.
 
Elimination of all viruses would mean the end of life on Earth, so this cannot be done, not on any planet where biosystems have viruses.
 
Chemical methods exist on other planets which stop a virus from replication, but the technology is both far above human scientific knowledge and its use on Earth by Visitors From Other Worlds, no different from blatant, prohibited interference into human life and societies.
 
Overall, we suggest avoidance of the injections and good focus on human bodily health, a subject already well covered and understood by humans.  

This is the design / drawing / circle from 8th August, more elaborate now. (The video of the first version follows below.)

The color of the crops has changed, and apparently humans have come and placed a few stones in the center. 

Does anyone, especially readers in the UK, know of any media organization that reports on these designs? Look how close the houses are —less than a ½ mile I'd say— but either nobody heard or saw what did this, or will not speak of it. Have no reporters dared go to those houses to ask around?

Given the deliberate ignorance of crop designs, it is no wonder at all so many folks doubt anything about Alien ETs.

I repeat a reader comment with a question within (bold regular type green)

RQ:    I found the statement recently about differences between Islam and Judaism, as well as the lack of tolerance an interesting point to reflect upon. I wonder if TC would say something about what about these two religions are we to learn and better understand from humanity's perspective? I know those who practice both religions and they are all lovely people with great ethics and integrity. But why can't these two religions coexist peacefully? Will this ever happen? Surely, we have something to learn from both sides, but one is not better or right than the other at the end of the day.

This comment reminds me of an old joke I've told here before, but shall repeat anyway, to the annoyance of some readers.

Somebody dies, arrives at Heaven's Pearly Gates, is asked about personal religious association, gets looked up on the registry, is admitted then sent to a specific religion room, with a request to be quiet passing the door immediately to the right. Arriving soul #2 is admitted including the religion question, with the same request for quiet, then #3 and so forth. After a dozen new arrivals have entered, along comes an atheist agnostic, proudly declaring religious doubt and indecision, who asks why everyone should be quiet passing that first door; St. Peter replies: "That’s the Catholic Room, they think they're the only ones here."

(I was baptized a Roman Catholic, by the way. I have not abdicated, pursued much worship, committed apostacy or been ex-communicated, yet.) 

The Committee speaks on this topic:

"Words use, we do not normally but with humans often yes, and this moment is one of such.

Muslims and Jews tolerate each other now, but it is not universal. Nearly all attention from outsiders-to-a-conflict is directed at same; the far larger majorities who tolerate one another, are not given much if any, human attention.

Would it not be far better to accept, instead of tolerate? The last word of the most recent sentence we have offered, means in human English: to put up with something that would probably not be chosen or would be sent away or left behind, if the tolerator could have preference.

Inside the nation of Israel, Jews, Muslims and other religions not only tolerate but accept each other's existence and presence. Could Israeli Jews rid themselves of Israeli Muslim citizens, if the far larger Jewish majority in Israel wished to do this? Look at the war now in motion for the answer, which you already knew is yes.

Do Israeli Jews simply tolerate Muslim fellow citizens, or accept them? The ability Israeli Muslims have to follow non-Hebrew religions, communicate in Arabic and avoid anything Jewish answers the question.
Your question, dear Reader, asks if this can be extended across the nations where the majority of populations are Muslim.

Let us look at the other end of the scale, societies where both Muslims and Jews live, but both groups are small minorities compared to far larger Christian majorities; we offer Great Britain, France, Canada and the USA as examples.    

No assistance or comment need we make; any of you can examine these places also and conclude as you wish. Essentially, no need exists in these nations for a Christian majority to force religious minorities to get along.

Arab Muslims and Jews can and do get along peacefully, but also attack and counterattack one another. The attackers are usually Muslim, the counterattacks Jewish. The attacks are ugly, the counterattacks uglier. The Muslims maintain that Jews are thieves and intruders, the Jews claim self-defence and preservation, and cite pre-emptive offensive strikes as good defence.

You who are not a Jew or a Muslim or an Arab, can assist by casting aside the doublespeak used to manipulate; too often are used the terms coexist and tolerance. These are tricks used to twist you.

All things coexist, this means nothing about getting along, being peaceful or accepting one another. Nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen and oxygen coexist. If combined in certain proportions, they produce a new chemical named nitroglycerine; this is dynamite. The elements still coexist peacefully in the explosive mixture, until a spark or other ignition point is supplied.

Stop using this word, when referring to groups who are at odds.

The next strong suggestion we have, is to stop using the word tolerance in place of acceptance, which are two most different things.

Tolerance emphasizes differences, disputes, disagreements and doubts. Acceptance lessens them. You who are told to be tolerant are being told to be submissive, subservient, staid and stupid. This is the handiwork of the HCPs.

As to the conflict, war, mass death and widespread killing of humans by humans now happening inside and close to Israel, we suggest two things:

1. If you are there, you can and should leave.
2. If you are not there, you should turn your attention away from it, thereby cutting off the energy supply the conflict requires as fuel.

 Be well one and all, do return soon."

The recent front-page photo (above) which struck me as interesting but nothing else, begets these excellent reader questions:

      Q:  The Front Page picture of huge stone walls with blocks of stone.

• Who made this structure, when and why?
• What was the purpose of the structure? It seems like a lot of work just for agricultural tiers.
• Were they made by turning the stone to the consistency of mud then 're-freezing' them? If not, how were the stone blocks shaped and moved?
• Why are the blocks all different shapes? The Great Pyramid in Egypt seems to have more standardized squared blocks.

C:    "This structure in Peru was built in the decades following the destruction of Atlantis by refugees from its demise. It was constructed to be used as type of meeting place, amphitheater and place to address public gatherings. The speakers would stand before the lowest wall and amplify their voices. 

It was not agricultural. It was not as labor intensive as it seems, given the use of anti-gravity devices and technology to move then locate the stones. 

The stones were cut to approximate size then heated to soften them, while suspended. As is well known, gravity and magnetism do not change effects on materials when changed to liquid of softer solid state; a magnet will attract softened, molten or solid iron or steel. 

The different shapes resulted from the blocks being cut quickly, thus easily. More than were needed were moved to the current site, then blocks of good size for the next part of the wall were chosen, heated and dropped into place. Their weight caused them to conform to the cooler solid rock already installed, distorting both to achieve a precise fit after all rock cooled and shrunk. The purpose was function over form.

The Great Pyramids were built of stones cut precisely before installation, and the process was largely conducted by Visitors-To-Earth, what today you would call Alien Extraterrestrials. Unlike the humans who built things in what is today Peru, the Alien ETs were precisely interested in form as a necessity for good function."
=====================================================
We also had a question about the Donald Trump would-be assassin:

RQ:     Was the person who shot C rooks aware of what was going to happen or expecting it, then reacted?

This refers to the Secret Service sniper (a service not so secret) who killed the would-be Trump assassin on the rooftop, as the assassin fired a half dozen or so shots at the former US President during a rally in Pennsylvania, USA. 

I interpret the question as asking:  Were law enforcement authorities at some level aware of the Trump threat and told to adjust?

This ventures into the realm of criminality, however I am getting general feedback; no names or specifics but a description, nonetheless. 

The Committee says:  Mr. Trump's outsider status to the political environment represented a threat to it. Established participants firmly believed American voters would select his opponent in the election of year 2016; we are referring to the HCPs and their employees. Many efforts were made to balance voter preferences in favor of Mrs. Clinton, which are normal during a campaign for office in any election. 

Observers of the process can see the moves made to strangle Mr. Trump, also to remove him from office, which was achieved in the election of year 2020. An especially compliant servant was installed, intended objectives in the wake of the installation have been achieved since the course change started in January of year 2021. Since Mr. Trump's departure from office, more moves have been made to reduce or prevent Mr. Trump's ability to win again. His former opponent, the incumbent president figurehead, has been removed on schedule. The political party involved has to this point supported his HCP selected replacement, the current Vice President. 

A greater goal has been achieved; to discard the primary election process in favor of installing a preferred candidate. This sets the precedent for doing so again; to improve political party thus HCP control of which candidate is presented to voters.  The regular repetition of the notion Mr. Trump is a threat to democracy has been offered to counterbalance the main challenge to democracy launched by the same political interests who denounce it in their opponent. 

The challenge to purveyors of this process is price of control, to be paid for with voter distrust. Dominance of the USA is a great prize but the traits and characteristics of the USA population, which make the dominance so valuable, are tricky to manage. As occurs across human societies, notions of belief and faith in a viable, trustworthy system must be maintained across a sufficient percentage of voters. 

This process has not worked; Mr. Trump has proven to be more resilient and tenacious than expected; the opposing political forces have made the error of measuring opposition in units of themselves. This is a common human trait; females assess differently compared to males; men do not interpret or understand women the same way as in the reverse, as part of a relationship process, to provide an example.

Mr. Trump's political opposition has chosen steps likely to be effective if inflicted upon that opposition by differing interests. Little introspection and virtually no moves have been made to analyze Mr. Trump then act in ways which would disturb the process successfully. 

This has been known for some time by the HCPs, but not the large majority of political operatives both elected and otherwise, whom they control. These knowledgeable interests have pursued parallel methods to eliminate the risk Mr. Trump's return to office represents. The decision to first prop up Mr. Biden's re-election campaign, then follow it with an attempt on Mr. Trump's life would have led to an easy re-election. Mr. Trump was narrowly missed, as the world observed. This failure led to the next step, to instruct Mr. Biden to step down and simultaneously support the current USA Vice President. You will note how voters did not select her and would not have, to be the presumptive presidential nominee for her party. Mrs. Emhoff, who prefers to use her unmarried name, attempted a run at The White House for the election of year 2020 but did not fare well. Her positions and receptivity to instructions and commands are what made her suitable for the Vice Presidency and again for The Oval Office.

The would-be assassin was lured, recruited and prepared for the attempt in ways which shall never be revealed, much of the process conducted by operatives far beyond the light from investigators. Credit cards were used with his name to purchase items in the days before the attempt, with the purpose to create an image of a sole operator, lone wolf shooter. The communications and travels he made are one-sided; all have and will always lead to dead ends.

Simultaneously, protection efforts for Mr. Trump were gradually scaled down to leave Mr. Trump more vulnerable. The reason the young, lone wolf operator route was taken, was to distract from suspicion of a sophisticated conspiracy. The owners of young Mr. Crooks knew he would be killed quickly, leaving definitive answers to many questions forever unanswered, whether successful or not from young Mr. Crooks' attempt to assassinate Mr. Trump.

Separation of local law enforcement personnel from direct control by the Secret Service, the absence of hyper vigilant surveillance of nearby rooftops, the sharply reduced number of counter snipers and other decisions such as the use of younger, less physically strong woman bodyguards, all were taken by leadership as deliberate steps, under both instruction and threats, to afford the young would-be assassin good opportunity to open fire. His relative lack of skill would have been overcome, but as the world also observed, Mr. Trump turned his head at the precise moment necessary to save his life. This was Guardian Angel intervention.

The counter sniper from the Secret Service was not told to wait or delay; he was overwhelmed by the volume of potential locations from which shots could be fired, so he relied upon ground personnel to prevent threats from reaching rooftops or other shooting positions. Several seconds and assassin shots passed by before he could locate the target threat, accurately aim then fire." 

​The questions continue, the answers follow. I have grown weary of the drumbeat of baited fishhooks cast out with apparent purpose of provoking debates over the bad/goodness of only Israeli. Why are no questions, remarks or comments offered here about the bad/goodness of Palestinians, Hamas, Gaza and the thousands of rockets, hundreds of Israeli hostages and 1,200 dead Israeli citizens?

Accordingly, these will be the final questions I address. The reason is, the tone and direction of comments have gone the way they seem to flow too often, in my limited experience thus opinion. The inability to gather sympathy, agreement and comity for the one perspective begets not a debate of ideas and different points-of-view, but suggestions of accusation, insults (e.g. disagreement = dimwit) and use of words and phrases no reported facts support.

If Israel wanted genocide in Gaza, by now AT LEAST a half a million victims would have perished, and the mass killing would be ongoing. Using that word "genocide" sounds like the doublespeak mentioned by Eric Blair (penname George Orwell) who presented this concept in the 1940s with his book 1984.  

I will probably read but not respond to further comments or remarks about the Gaza Strip, Israel, Palestine, the ongoing civil war in Israel or things related.

Q1.      Will there be an Iran-Israel war?
C:         No. The assassination of the Hamas leader in Tehran, Iran was carried out by Iranians, who have used the killing as opportunity to blame Israel and threaten an attack. This feeds internal Iranian political ends, the reason it has been done. Hamas was used and abused by the Iranians and the Palestinians now suffering under the Israeli counter-offensive were foreseen as expendable and worth the gain Iranian leaders hoped to realize.

Q2.      Will the [military] forces of other middle eastern nations jointly attack Israel?
C:         Military forces will not, but ideological forces will and have already.

Q3.      What would be the role of USA, Russia and China if such a war happens?
C:         The shooting and bombing war will not happen.

Q4.      There were prophecies indicating Arab forces attacking Vatican and possibly other countries in Europe. Will it materialize?
C:         The opportunity already has and did and has long since passed. Arab forces will not carry out attacks inside or near Italy, Rome or Vatican City.

Q5.      What will be the situation in Saudi Arabia? Will the current ruler be deposed?
C:         The situation regarding what aspect? This must be stated. The king in Saudi Arabia will not be deposed in the usual sense. The king of the USA was deposed in 2020, the removal successfully painted as an election and the removed king depicted as a sore loser. That the former king seeks a return and will achieve it, was cause for his recent attempted assassination.

The change in monarchs in Saudi Arabia will be carried out to appear to be the opposite of being removed, so when it happens and appears otherwise, you who now read these words will know he was deposed.

To the reader who doubts this, we offer the way a main political party participated in state-by-state elections to select a nominee for the presidential election, then the same party pushed the democratically elected candidate aside. Into that role has been thrust a replacement who was not and could not have been chosen by voters. We offer this example as a demonstration of the ways a political party and regime will design an outcome but attempt, often successfully, to convince constituents to accept it.

Q6.      Will the leadership in Jordan be overthrown?
C:         Yes, in a way that will appear to be the opposite of an overthrow. As happened in the USA in year 2020. This will require several years to manifest; set aside current expectations regarding such event.

Q7.      The Russia-Ukraine war is still going on. How long will this last? Will Kiev fall to the Russian forces?
C:         The condition in Ukraine is not a war, it is a forced annexation and occupation; the resistance will continue for as long as the former nation of Ukraine is given money to buy weapons. As soon as the ability to scrape at Russian forces fades away, hostilities will drop off quickly.

Q8.      Will Zelensky be captured or killed by the Russians?
C:         He already has been. Mr. Zelenskyy knows his former nation is allowed to exist in name but has become a new version of Russian oblast. The USSR is being reconstructed to the extent it can.

Q9.      The Committee predicted a world leader being assassinated while visiting another country. Has this event happened? The Hamas leader was assassinated in Iran but he is not exactly a world leader, I presume.
C:         Yes, this was one of several events predicted. Two have happened, with Iran and now Hamas and Palestine, a quasi-nation by current human standards. More to follow.

Q10.    I remember TC predicting a weather event in Southern hemisphere killing many people and unusual in its place of occurrence. Is that event yet to occur?
C:         It has not yet occurred but shall.

Q11.    The rise of the people in Bangladesh resulted in the elected PM fleeing the country. Will there be an Islamic hardline party or leader in power in the near future?
C:         Both, the leader being part of the regime.

Q12.    What will be the situation in Bangladesh be like in the rest of the years of this decade? Any prediction ?
C:         You have foreseen it with your last question. Hardline Islamic regime.
 
Q13:   Will Israel + Allies v Persian/Arab fundamentalist use tactical nuclear weapons on Iran or Israel and cause the rest of the world to give up on peace, hope and democracy?
C:        No.
 
Q14:   Was the person who shot C rooks aware of what was going to happen or expecting it, then reacted?
             Who or what is “C rooks” ?
 
Q15:      What causes skepticism about the holocaust? Is it cynicism or the self-loathing that Karl Marx may have suffered from? Or projection?
C:        The doubt arises from several factors, the two principal parts of the doubt are, first: little or no study of the documented history of Buchenwald, Treblinka to name but two examples of death camps Germany established in Poland plus the general rise of the agencies and forces in Germany used to first oppress then round-up Jews. These were the Hitler Youth, the Brown Shirts, the SA, the Gestapo and the Waffen SS.

​The second part is a childhood then adulthood of slow and steady criticism of Jews offered across many societies. Because the Jewish population is small in many larger, wealthier thus influential nations, many adults have no opportunity to meet, greet, study, know and generally interact with Jews. Absent this exposure makes it easier to paint a picture where no counterbalance effect will come forth.

Q16:    Does cognitive dissonance occur when some interpret the Israeli Hamas War?
C:         Yes.

Q17:   Would not any other Western nation react ruthlessly if 4,000 rockets and 250 hostages happened to them?
C:        Yes, a nasty reaction would nearly always occur.

Q18:   Would not another nation with the same capabilities as Israel use them in both defense and attack?
C:        Yes, but such nations would successfully deter the attack, and it would not happen. Hamas was well deterred until given weapons and money by Iran that Hamas leaders were unable to resist.

Q19:    Why is it not widely reported that the group trauma caused by the holocaust is easily triggered? The Committee explained this is a human not spiritual level response.
C:        Because the trauma triggered occurs mostly in Israel and is not reported outside Israel. Most Holocaust survivors and others who felt the effects of World War II in general  (e.g. your website host’s father [my addition, not a Committee quote])  have either died or mentally grown far beyond it. A fair number of Jewish concentration camp survivors were rescued from them in late 1945; most left Europe, many went to Israel and died there. The ongoing attacks, such as the Six Day War on 1967, the early 1980s conflict with Lebanon, ongoing threats from the PLO and Hamas and random suicide bombers and rockets launched into Israel, have perpetuated the high alert awareness nearly all Israelis maintain.

Q20:   Will there be a Israel + Allies v Persian/Arab fundamentalist war in order to be the latest chapter of divide and rule and cause some people to give up?
C:        No.

Q21:   Have not financiers that happen to be in Britain and Europe been manipulating western leaders longer, better and more effective than other financiers that happen to be Jewish?
C:        Yes and no, the definitions and parameters of manipulation must be specified first but we caution the asker, this would get into the area of criminality, and we shall refrain from much detail.
Overall, we can say, the lenders and bankers to whom you refer can be both Jewish and active in Britain, Europe, the USA and many nations. Either directly or through well concealed fronts, who disguise the identity of the true owners of the loan or debt obligations. 

Other than YooToob videos, what attention is ever given to this and other pieces of irrefutable evidence, by what press organizations, where? 
​