|
A reader asks:
Concerning the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, from technical and economic points-of-view:
On a related but different topic: 3. Does future microchip technology vastly surpass current technology in a matter of 10 to 20 years? More precisely, will it be able to cram in a small area a much higher number of transistors than currently used (it seems that we can produce in the near future, chips with 300 million transistors per square millimeter) or create new types of architectures much more efficient, create quantum computing chips able to solve in almost no time very complex and difficult computational problems? "Much higher" means adding a factor of at least one million times higher transistor density (which would be 300 billion transistors per square mm) or a chip 10.000 times faster in solving the same computational problem. There is an interesting empirical law in the microprocessor industry, called first Moore's Law, which estimated that transistor density in a given chip area would double each 10 years. Historical data have demonstrated this law was pretty much conservative. We were able to reach much higher densities in 50 years than the value predicted. My questions: 4. Is there a hard limit to the chip density based on silicon technology? is it near our current limits, or have we much more improvements to reach? 5. Will such high tech and high energy intensive industry be maintained in the next future (10 to 50 years)? My impression is that our economies will not be able to support it... At least at the levels we are currently used. Respondeth The Committee: 1. No. There will be no degradation, gradual or sudden, in Russian military capability caused by microchip shortages. Russia has done the same as have many nations, with its military supplies, equipment & materials. Stockpiled or stored sufficient parts, components, materials & equipment to maintain operations for considerable time. The precise duration of this capability depends on several factors: offensive or defensive action, distance from Russia's borders, intensity of attacker or defensive response. The general view taken by Russia's military planners is, less than latest technology equipment which works reliably is much better than the most recent technology which does not work. The secondary challenge to the sanctions is disobedience. The manufacturers of miniature electronic components are not pleased with the idea that punishing Russia means they should likewise suffer economically. They see themselves as no different than a steel producer being blamed for the way a tank is used, made from the raw material the steel producer supplies. Accordingly, they will find a way around the sanctions relatively easily. The attempts to restrict commerce between Russia and suppliers outside its borders are for appearances, they are relatively or very easily circumvented. 2. See our answer to No. 1 3. This depends upon your definition of "vastly" but we shall say this; first will come advances in calculation or operational speed, then shall come miniaturization. Microchips are already very small and represent no impediment to equipment they are used to control. As known by many engineers involved in design and operation of microprocessor-controlled equipment, the challenge is not size but temperature, thus temperature controls, such as used in computer server rooms, or designs which both separate and insulate microprocessor-controlled circuits are employed. 4. Yes. There is a far higher limit to chip density and capacity, however it must employ a material other than silicon. Using silicon still offers improvements, at a lower capacity and speed, however the current effort thus costs required to achieve material performance improvements, would not currently be viable commercially. As a comparison we suggest quartz crystal wristwatch accuracy. One such device which achieves accuracy of ten or twenty seconds per month is considered inexpensive. It will operate reliably for a decade or longer. A device which achieves accuracy inside several seconds per year can cost eighty or one hundred times as much. Emotional perception, and the aura of fine jewelry finishing, create the attraction for the more accurate device. In commercial use, performance is the main and often sole consideration. 5. Double yes. Advances will always continue, even if consumer demand shrinks. It is true expanding demand will create economic opportunity which almost immediately attracts innovation, if of lesser intensity or vigor. Nevertheless, as economic metamorphosis unfolds across mankind, the desire to expand technological advances will grow, not shrink. Bear in mind, your extraterrestrial cousins are keen to share insights and to provide hints, where doing so will not become interference. The hope is that enough humans will actively request knowledge and advice, including for technology, and then delivery of such assistance will not be interference. Smaller then increasingly larger things can be offered, always according to human request. As Earth passes through phases of physical changes, some humans among you aware of alien extraterrestrials will attempt to blame visitors to Earth for events. This silliness will however serve a purpose; others who do not share that view will give more attention to the topic. Among these observers will be a minority at first then growing quickly larger, people who see the illogic; why would visitors to Earth cause geophysical events and upheaval when they could instead, much more easily attack humans and also take from you and from the planet itself, whatever they liked? The general acceptance of the existence of visitors to Earth will bring forward initially small but then growing groups of humans who will inquire of these visitors about technologies. Microprocessor chip and other technologies, such as medical, will benefit in many ways.
31 Comments
I'm a trekkie. 🖖🏽 In many episodes, Star Fleet characters mention future human societies where money isn’t used. I can hardly imagine a current development which could produce, both at the same time, as many thrilled, happy & screaming-with-joy people as it creates unhappy, despondent & screaming-in-pain people, as the elimination of money would do. Money is a human invention Heaven doesn't use. What's that like and how would it work on Earth amongst us? ====================================== Reader Follow-Up Questions 27 July 2022 Q1: So is it accurate to say that gaining knowledge and understanding is a TOP PRIORITY for most souls in heaven? (The Committee said every soul "wants" K&U, but I wanted to how important obtaining K&U is for souls) C: It is the purpose of a soul's existence. 2: Why are the other ways of gaining knowledge and understanding (excluding incarnation) not revealed in the Q&A session? C: Because such revelations would create distractions and confusion straight away, or prompt more questions the answers to which would deliver even straighter away, more confusion and distractions. You incarnated to largely forget about such things, in order to remember yourself, remember what you are, then to apply these remembrances to your incarnated lives. The natural human proclivity to flee from, to avoid & to reduce what is unpleasant, mixed & blended with attraction to the positive —which are the essence of humans— would cause many humans to discard their life plans in pursuit of what you mention. One example of this is the abuse of hallucinogenic drugs. 3. Do the souls in heaven spend most of their "time" (I know time doesn't exist in heaven, but I don't know what else to call it from earth perspective) gaining knowledge and understanding from the other methods not discussed the Q&A session? I'm just trying to get a better understanding of what it is we do when we go back to our home of heaven. C: Yes 4) So for the souls that don't incarnate, which is most of the souls in heaven (according to The Committee in previous discussions), the other methods not mentioned are sufficient to get this knowledge and understanding? C: Yes and no. Yes, the methods are sufficient to place a soul on the path leading to knowledge and understanding but this process is never complete. No soul ever completely gets there, and no soul wants to. The ride is extremely enjoyable and fulfilling. You will all appreciate this when you return home and see how much you enjoyed your current adventure on & across the surface of Planet Earth. 
Reader Questions for The Committee:
1. Will another virus appear in the coming years which will spread worldwide like COVID? C: Naturally occurring viruses do not spread the way the recent occurrence developed, because the natural viruses have already done this. Humans cannot yet measure it, but immunity developed by parents can be inherited by their offspring. The genetic basis of the mRNA injection exists because of this process, but it is too risky still, for humans to attempt genetic modification of the immune system. The human immune system develops resistance to a contagion first, then programs its genes to pass on such immunity to offspring, either partially or completely. Human medical science cannot detect this, yet. The virus which travelled around the world in 2019 but was not recognized around the world until human year 2020, was not a natural occurrence. Are humans going to engineer another such virus and release it? Humans have been created stronger, thus more lethal, viruses for many decades, so the development part is not new. It continues. Will another one be released intentionally? This question asks us to forecast criminal acts. We believe the readers of this website already understand what are willing to say and not to say, about human criminality or innocence related to criminal acts. RQ2. Will communism make a comeback? C: It has never gone away and shall not. Just as a human somewhere will always cultivate plants then process extracts into strong narcotics for the effect of altering the mind, so shall humans somewhere promote the communist economic system. A form of what communism’s creators desired will come to be, when significant changes come to human societies, however these will occur voluntarily. So far humans have resisted the compulsion required to force communism upon a population, the principal reason it fails, among others. Once the circumstances decline, which motivate voluntary cooperation with a communist way of distributing products, communism will fade away. 3. Will the global temperature rise as a result of volcanic eruptions be followed by a "Mini Ice Age"? C: No, not in the lifetimes of humans, their children or grandchildren now alive. 4. Will the irregularities of 2020 Presidential Election in which Trump lost ever be exposed? C: The irregularities have already been exposed, however the details are ignored by the vast majority of press organizations which & who would reveal what happened. Dislike of Donald Trump has overcome principle. 5. Will there really be a one-world government controlled by a so called "Antichrist" which will implant microchips in people to control what they buy and sell, as some prophecies claim? Where will this "Anti-Christ" come from? C: No, however communications technology has brought mankind very close to such a situation already, being a single governing body for Earth. Often we discuss them here, your website host has nicknamed them the HCPs. The term anti-Christ must be defined before such a question can be answered. Many people today would have little difficulty with certain well-known public figures being considered an anti-Christ, but who are not. Microchips are far too crude and unreliable; your minds are already microchipped with ideas. How many of you believe firearms prohibitions reduce violent crime and murder? 6. Any predictions on events that will take place in Argentina, France and Italy in the coming years? C: How many years are involved in the coming ones you mention, and what types of events? Do you believe people of those nations and others interacting with them, have no free will? We understand the reaction to our question will be no, of course not. 7. Will there be volcanic eruption in La Palma again? C: Yes. 8. Will the east coast of USA be hit by a Tsunami? C: Yes, as it has been struck in the past. Not during lifetimes of humans now alive or their children, will a significant tsunami strike the eastern seaboard of the USA with sufficient force and energy to cause broad loss of life and material changes to the coastline. 9. How long will Putin be in power in Russia? C: This decision has not been made. As things stand now, approximately one more decade. 10. From when the fluctuations of magnetic poles will be severe enough to affect air travel? C: As the Dim Period comes to an end. 11. Will the next oil shock be caused by the earthquake in Hormuz? C: Not the next one, no; however this event is indicated. 12. Will there be a war in the Middle East? If so, which countries will be involved? C: There is war there now. You mean a new armed conflict which increases in its intensity, between the standing armed forces of sovereign, recognized nations to the degree most observers will consider such escalation to be a war? Yes, for brief extremely intense bursts. 13. Will oil be discovered in Israel? C: It already has. It is not economically viable to produce. This has been known for many years. ================================================= PLEASE SEND QUESTIONS FOR THE WEBSITE HOST OR FOR THE COMMITTEE, THROUGH THE "CONTACT & QUESTIONS" PAGE. If you're a newer, first time or recent enough arrival not to know what "The Committee" is, a few return visits will provide some background. You may also send a question about that. Many of you will remember, and I am sure many of you saved, extracts and summaries of things The Committee has said over the years since 2012, posted here. These were kindly, generously and I dare say, heroically prepared by reader Denis Giroux of Québec, Canada.
Denis translated the entire proposal for The New Electricity into French without me even asking for him to do that, complaining that his French has slipped over the years, given his increasing use of English. This was not true, but he wanted to be humble about his talent and ability. Denis will not be preparing more of these. He is in Heaven, having gone home almost three weeks ago. Let's send Denis a big hello and ask him for a sign of his visit. His appreciation for The Committee's work kept me going at many a time, as Denis now knows better than even I.
PLEASE SEND QUESTIONS FOR THE WEBSITE HOST OR FOR
THE COMMITTEE, THROUGH THE "CONTACT & QUESTIONS" PAGE. If you're a newer, first time or recent enough arrival not to know what "The Committee" is, a few return visits will provide some background. You may also send a question about that. Says & asks a reader:
I am more than happy to believe that the White Hats, the Pleiadeans, the Earth Alliance, the “Good Guys” have an agenda, a plan to heal the ills of our planet and that this plan will be disclosed very soon, to the amazement and delight of all, and that they have chosen Donald Trump to be the frontman, the spokesperson, letting him play president, as they pull his strings in the background. That all makes sense to me. But I find it impossible to believe that Trump himself is the brains behind the plan. It just couldn’t be. How could anyone be smart enough to come up with a master plan to get our world working properly, and in the next moment utter the most ignorant, hateful, hurtful, embarrassing things every time he opens his mouth? If he’s really a closet genius but publicly plays the buffoon, what would be his reasoning? First of all, no one is that good an actor. And second, it simply makes no sense. What good does it do “the cause” to have someone be our front man who only upsets and divides people whenever he speaks? How does that help things? The Good Guys who chose him must be deeply regretting their choice. Was Trump the only one available who would agree to play the role of Puppet #1? Are the White Hats, as they work to save our civilization, quietly kicking themselves for having made such a sorry choice? In their meetings do they beg him, “Please, Mr. President, don’t talk off the cuff in public. You’re not helping things!” When I hear Trump supporters say, “Trust Trump!” I feel like responding, “No! Trust The Plan in spite of Trump! Trust the hidden forces for good and pray that their sorry spokesperson doesn’t totally ruin things!” Please ask The Committee if I’ve come close to an accurate assessment of the current situation. The Committee says: The plan to "heal the ills" of Earth does not exist. What you might describe as ills are mostly intentional, designed to provide incarnated experiences. No representative, such as who you describe, was, has been or shall be appointed to lead. If you wish to select a human with intelligence, insight and the ability to create then achieve the results of a plan, there are few humans more capable than Donald Trump. As a concrete example we remind how he rose to the top of elective politics in the USA to become the most influential and powerful man on Earth after a long successful career, successfully avoiding elective politics. You disagree with what Mr. Trump says, and how he often says it. Not everyone sees him through your filter. As to the accuracy of your assessment, we refer back to our first sentence of this answer. |
||||
