"If the planned future already exists..." This is where it gets a little complicated for me, I dont know if anyone else is a little stumped. But this "Your reaction is the only thing that matters." Thats been important since we started talking about this. I get that.
I guess the planned future is the pre-birth life plan for the individual and the collective. Events are set up accordingly and you react on the external events. Based on your reaction, the plan changes and the events change accordingly. So your reaction can change the future that has been planned in the current life and sets the stage for events in a "future" life. And so it continues. Ultimately, its the reaction that matters, not the event.
That was great, Santanu. I got it now. Great explanation. Thanks for doing that.
I agree with what you said there. I have to think a little harder on this one.
Message to Mankind-4 of 10--Wonderful breakdown of our existence--our reactions truly are our choice, no matter what the experience. And yes, the Holy Spirit and other guides are here to assist us.
This reminds me of a recent video (Master Jesus Speaks) and it was said the "present moment" is technically living the "past." Also, reminds me of what Abraham-Hicks refers to as a "summoning" of energy and teaches us to create the future we prefer (Law of Attraction.)
Many thanks, Patrick and TC--another great message (and lesson!)
Tulsi Gabbard talking about the danger of the 25 U.S.-funded bio-labs in Ukraine. If they are blown up during this war, then . . .
She said the U.S. funds around 300 bio-labs around the world.
The hilarious thing are the many current headlines and articles saying the bio-labs in Ukraine are a conspiracy theory.
OMG ! Why are these labs even existing, if not for Biological warfare !
Such biological laboratories exist for several reasons.
▶ Chemical and biological agents are potent weapons, ignoring what enemies do about & with them is risky.
▶ Several or many nations prohibit laboratory research for development within that nation's borders. This is moral high ground and can be dangerous. Something like 98-99% of public mass shooting incidents in the USA occur in locations where firearms are banned. The % of places in the USA where guns are prohibited is tiny.
▶ Samples captured through intelligence and espionage require analysis and assessment of risk.
▶ Where the line should be drawn between defensive & protective work compared to offensive capability, is foggy, blurry and difficult to define.
▶ A good way to neutralize an enemy's capability is to produce an antidote or neutralizing agent, then inform said enemy that their bio/chemo weapon is not as effective as they believe, and our knowledge of it means a swift and brutal retaliation. This likely deters such enemy. None of this can be achieved without good laboratory research.