A reader asked in the comments for the most recent post:
I would like to ask the Committee which part of [the moon landing] footage was falsified, to what purpose.
Instead of going word-for-word, I am paraphrasing The Committee, who have addressed similar questions before. Full disclosure: I remember watching the live broadcast in 1969 at home, on a black & white console television set. I don't remember why I was the only one home but it gave me the chance to watch very closely. I remember how impressed I was, the objective of NASA (National Aeronautical Space Administration).
The humans who traveled to the moon and back were military officers and experienced pilots. These men were well trained in the process of keeping secrets. It was not difficult to maintain their silence; they did not see doing so as wrong, or as a betrayal of the citizenry. Had the astronauts viewed the matter differently, they would not have been selected; intense psychological profiling was done.
Leaders of the USA, civilian and military both, had long been aware of the existence and some of them interacting with, visitors to Earth. It was and remains well understood these visitors do as they wish and are most interested in observation. It has also been long understood these visitors have scientific technology and abilities humans do not understand, giving the visitors ability to observe anything chosen, without human ability to block, impede or stop it.
The decision to attempt a live broadcast of the landing and humans stepping onto the moon's surface was done to lift awareness, public image and a good reputation for the USA during the Cold War period between the USA and the USSR.
The challenge to overcome was to prevent the uncontrolled appearance of alien extraterrestrial vessels, who have observed at close distances, sometimes from less than ten meters, all objects humans have placed or attempted to put into orbit.
Because the risky segment of the voyage through the radiation belts would be accomplished with shielding materials found by humans, the trip was very closely observed at the parts the human vessels passed through the Van Allen belts.
The majority of the footage taken is legitimate but edited before release. The live images transmitted of and from the module which set down on the moon's surface, were staged in advance. These portions were filmed inside studios on military bases in Nevada and Arizona of the USA.
The reason was worry, concern and even fear the alien extraterrestrials would appear on the live feed, popping the cork and allowing the genie out of the bag. The prime directive of non-interference with human societies and civilizations ends at the Van Allen belts. Humans who survive passage through the lethal radiation barrier enter the interplanetary zone, where no protective, restrictive or compromising rules do or shall ever apply.
Thus, humans on the surface of Earth's satellite are not, were not and shall never be shielded, protected or guarded in the same ways humans on Earth are protected.
Very little of the true footage has been released, because several alien extraterrestrial vessels from several civilizations appear, both on the surface and also in orbit about the moon. These vessels also matched the course and speed of the vessels during the trip from Earth to the moon and were photographed by human astronauts, but these images have never been released to the public.
Humans did land on the moon and return safely, were watched and guarded by the alien extraterrestrials but this protection did not come to operate, no need arose, however the video imagery has been massaged to exclude all extraterrestrial vessels.
As I watch the Suspicious Observer YT channel (especially the one posted this morning) I can see how our magnetosphere fluctuates as the Earth receives the ionized particles from our sun. We know Earth is a giant magnet so if our our magnetosphere compresses it brings the VanAllenBelts closer at times to the Earth which can bring about another Carrington Event (the most intense geomagnetic storm in the current electrical age.)
The prime directive —the rule which prohibits visitors to Earth from doing anything which might change the course of Earth events, physical or social, beyond what humans decide or that occur as natural phenomena, e.g. supernovae, asteroid impacts, hurricanes or earthquakes— does not apply to humans once we venture above Earth's atmosphere.
You can see an example of the prime directive in place in this trailer from Star Trek Into Darkness https://youtu.be/ldxE2DLZ-tA
That was cool to watch again! Thanks Cheryl. I don't think the leap off the cliff into the sea would be survivable and the idea some device could stop a volcanic eruption?
inte totalt relaterad men jag såg en pilot som säger att han vet att jorden är plat, vi ver svaret men jag är ute efter anledningen till varför en pilot tror eller ljuger om det.
Linda, I keep thinking about that video of the royals at the Coronation looking shocked because of what they were looking at. One thing I noticed, they're not all looking in the exact same direction. Whatever it is they saw, was spread out... I'd like to join you in asking the Committee if they are able to comment.
They saw Donald Trump when they should have been seeing Charles. It was a magician’s trick —I think it’s called the switcheroo and the use of Hollywood special affects using computer imaging etc. Donald J Trump is the rightful king through his bloodline and the possession stone of destiny. Check it out.
The Committee says: "Humans should ask the humans what shocked and surprised humans. The surprised know and the observers saw. Such people can ask one another. If the greater audience, observing this ceremony remotely, wishes to know, that can be achieved among and between humans."
Dear Committe & Patrick,
See above! ▲
16 years ago a programmer testified about this exact thing...
"..this exact thing.." The Lunar Moon? The video is about how an election can be manipulated with computer programs.
Landing within 10 meters of them? Lol. We got some nosy cousins that need to be taught the term "personal space".
The whole reason for Star Trek to be channeled to Gene Roddenberry, so the human race could have a clear idea about where we are headed and what's in store for us...
Consider what you have been told about Larry Page to be a fabrication, created both 1. to throw "fans" off the track and also 2. continue to generate interest in the affair.
Geez, well, ok.
They want us to stay out of space until we have better safer technology to do it. We were flying by the seat of our pants with Apollo, weren't we? Our attitude has always been, we're Americans, and goddamnit we'll plow through this thing safe or not...
So I notice your latest front page title seems to emphasize the words "the" and "end". Is something ending? Curious.
Update, they're fine. Just chased for awhile by paparazzi.
Netflix needed something for their show about those two (ex-royals) since Megan wasn’t at the coronation and was Harry’s attendance wasn’t much of a storyline. What was needed was drama. Lights, camera, ACTION! It’s all BS. Speeding around NYC for hours? It’s laughable.
@linda was the car crash under similar circumstances that killed his mother also laughable. Whether it's bs or not those people with the cameras probably get paid good even though it can be risky and dangerous trying to get a photo op.
Articles of Impeachment just called for against Pres. Joe Biden.
I thought that happened about twenty minutes after Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives in early January 2023
Ha-ha! One would think, Patrick, but today was the day, or "impeachment week" as it's being called. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene did the deed:
But will it mean anything...
Problem is, they can't do the one thing that would really matter. Removal from office.
The FBI is a big pile of manure.
"White supremacist" means supporters of Donald Trump. Given what I have seen & heard reported, the threat if any, is ANTIFA. Democrat politicians in the USA cannot allow black voters to slip to a more typical pattern of voting % such as: Other 5, Republican 30, Democrat 65 which would become a loss of millions of votes and most elections Democrats now win.
Frustrating, isn't it?
Leave a Reply.