Free Europe

The post title's first word, adjective or verb?   

​A reader asks 7 questions, and I ask a few more at the end.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Here in Europe, everyone is on alert over the latest announcement over the lockdown in Austria and possible compulsory vaxx. Opinions are mixed too. So, these questions are related to the varying points of views I’ve heard over the course of the day:

1.     Why is this harsh approach starting in Austria, again?
C:     Harsh to you, harsh to some others but not harsh to yet others outside and beyond you and the harsh perception group, some indifference mixed into the middle. You ask why Austria, and we say because the leadership and population are more predisposed to these measures. A study of Austrian history, sociology & psychology reveals this propensity for authoritarianism. Of course it has changed over the decades and centuries, but remains.

2.     Is Germany next? 
C:     Germany is in line, and could be next. The leadership in Germany is observing the effects in Austria politically. The German leadership knows an improvement in hospitalization and case rates in Austria might occur, so this will be used as justification to impose similar requirements in Deutschland. German leadership also knows an improvement might NOT follow, but this can also be used to justify nationwide vaccination requirements, to reverse the increases. The decision revolves on perceived political effect.

Overall, the reasons these developments are manifesting in German speaking nations is the national character of organization, order, progress and development. The desire for the benefits of technical and scientific advancement breeds a sense of control, authority and obedience. 

These traits are relatively harmless, often beneficial when perceived trouble, difficulty or threat seem far away. When risk and danger appear, these social qualities rise to the surface. The desire to control, to avoid victimhood, weakness or failure are strong in the German speaking cultures.

3.      The Netherlands seems to be bristling, with a genuine split of opinions. Will The Netherlands go into lockdown? Is there a genuine split of opinions?
C.      The Netherlands have demonstrated a centuries long proclivity and tendency towards acceptance of different opinions, ideas and approaches mixed with the pragmatic desire for good result, organization and outcome. The history of the nation reveals many examples, the Dutch planting the seed for this social approach in its daughter nation of long ago, now known as the USA. 

No, the Dutch will not impose requirements against or penalties for free movement as the situation exists now, this goes sharply against Dutch character. For something to occur this way now, a significant catalyst event will be required. Working solidly against Dutch impositions and sanctions is Germany; a good way to see that The Netherlands will disfavor an idea, is for The Dutch to see the Germans do it. All citizens of both nations know this. 

Yes, The Netherlands manifests a significant split of opinions, but not much different than other nations in Europe, except "in Nederland" the differences are reported much more. In other European nations, the press is more reluctant to seek dissent and to inform the public; fear of official dislike, disapproval or wrath are stronger in most other European nations for doing this. 

4.      The Scandi countries don’t have a stomach for lockdown. So, will they try to remain neutral for as long as possible? Will they succeed?
C:      The Scandinavian nations will not follow vaccination requirements or restrictions against public movement imposed in other European nations, even if the European Union attempts to pressure, push or coerce them. These directives, suggestions, ideas or threatened retaliations from the EU will be ignored in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. 

5.      England is an outlier country that tends to do its own thing. Will Boris Johnson succeed in keeping the vaxx mandate out and away from England?
C:       England voted to leave the European Union as a demonstration of the independent will and determination the British peoples possess. No vaccination commands or compliance orders will be issued in the United Kingdom for citizens or residents. 

6.      Suspicion is rising that governments want 100% compliance. Is that the case?
C:       Yes, nearly all governments around the world. Loathe we are to offer criminal information, and what we say now might be interpreted as otherwise. To impose the requirement requires that central authorities use collected taxes to pay for the injections, making them what will said is free. The producers of the vaccines will ask for in advance or offer to pay a portion of the monies received for selling the injection doses. This is a significant motivator for many officials who know that millions are possibly to be earned. These payments are commonly called kickbacks. The authorities see significant personal financial benefit to doing this, aiming for absolute compliance; and number of reluctant people will give in and comply, justifying the purchase of more doses. Each one represents money in the pocket of the authority.

The second benefit for leadership is the increased ability to exercise authority. The enjoyment, pleasure or satisfaction derived are one aspect of this, the softened ability of the population to resist subsequent orders, commands or instructions is another aspect. These can be impositions related to the current matter or to another one. Never believe that attraction to authoritarianism is low for a public office candidate.  

7.       Is resistance sufficiently strong to withstand the relentless coercion to get the population of European countries 100% vaccinated (if that is the hidden agenda)?
C:       This objective and goal will not be hidden much longer, already revealed somewhat, your question the evidence of the unveiling. Resistance preventing the goal from being reached is normal, because perfection or one hundred percent compliance are not possible. These make little sense unless Austria plans to shut border crossings to any unvaccinated human. The effects in the near or far future, or any intermediate time frame, are obvious and detrimental. The leadership knows all of this. 

Safety and promises of security are now, as always, being used a justification, just as such explanations are and have been used for promised economic benefits derived from government control. Such measures produce no true lasting economic improvements, but the realization comes far enough after the impositions that explanations are offered and these are accepted.

So will develop the pattern with vaccine commands, and after the process is complete, when the authoritarian leaders are satisfied with their money, control lust and extension of time in office & power, will come the explanations of how all people should be thankful something was done.     
============================================================

Q:       Esteemed Committee, the recent full moon and eclipse were a really good show, especially since yesterday morning I got to watch the full moon set against a half dark sky just as the sun rose with a nice display of reddish, pink and yellow clouds for decoration. The reddish moon during the middle of the night was cool, as always. Why didn't any natural disasters occur? Isn't that the prediction?
C:        Yes, however be patient. Full moons are monthly. 

Q:        News reports in the USA recently told us about a senior citizen care facility or nursing home in Connecticut USA where an outbreak of the coronavirus caused many residents to become sick and eight among them died. All of the sick and dead were vaccinated several times. How is this happening?
C:         As you also know from the news, the deceased were elderly and had other medical conditions, the pattern as happens with bacterial and viral infection since the beginning of infections. The inability of the vaccine to provide protection occurs because it does not enhance immune system response or performance, simply attempts to tune the immune system's focus towards a future invader.  If the actual intruder virus never enters the vaccinated person's metabolism, the effects of this attempted re-engineering fade, often quickly. 

​This is known. It is the reason the many of you around the world are hearing the repeated calls for subsequent booster shots. The far better way, far better than genetic manipulation, is to prevent significant symptoms through self assessment and health improvements.

In cases of healthy humans in good or better physical condition, who indeed follow a diet with regular, consistent consumption of fresh fruit and vegetables, who do not abuse drugs including alcohol, which means they do not consume illicit drug substances ever and have moderate alcoholic drink consumption, who are not consistent cigarette smoke inhalers and undergo regular exercise, the far better inoculation for these people is to intentionally expose themselves. These people will develop rapid, long lasting immunity far beyond what the current genetic therapy method attempts. 

Q:        Are fear of sickness and death perpetrating the spread?
C:        Yes, because as we have said long ago and since repeated often, thoughts create effects. Fear of disease begets disease, fear of sickness makes more sickness, fear of death brings about deaths.  Put attention on something to have more of it. Have thoughts of strength, health, vitality and dominance over the virus, and it is much less likely to cause an effect or an unpleasant one.

The motivation behind the creators of the virus know this. They know the use of mind manipulation quite well, thus they did plant seeds of fear with reported deaths, sickness, vaccines and civil restrictions. 

​Choose strength, vitality, health and well being. Fear of the vaccine's bad side effects will tend to bring about bad side effects. Fear begets itself, the same as confidence.  Avoiding the vaccine with confidence, if one's good health is the goal. Take care to improve or maintain health and be confident this shall protect you best, for it shall achieve both good health and good humor.