Crown Virus Potpourri 7

A reader asks:  I have a few potpourri questions I would like to ask [The Committee]:
​
Not potpourri at all, these seven questions are specific to the topic.

Q1.      If the negative health effects of the mRNA vaccines will become be more obvious and difficult to obscure by summer 2022, is this why governments seem to be ramping up with so much gusto and speed to pass laws for mandatory vaccines?
C:         No, not in general. The increase in commands, orders and penalties for either receiving or declining the injection are related to government authority, specifically desire to exercise same. A mixture of genuine desire to reduce the impact of the virus across a population, and urge to issue commands to observe compliance, are what drive this issue. The same hypnotic fear which has been carefully generated across populations has not remained far from government leadership; to the contrary they have been likewise contaminated with this thinking and use it to justify decisions to control the population.

Q2.      Would governments be willing to rescind these mandatory requirements once these revelations are made more prominent or obvious that cannot be ignored anymore?
C:         Governments are a collective effect of individual people. Some people would if the evidence were convincing however the logical analysis does little to reduce fear, worry and desire to impose. How much affects any one person in government is varied, the cumulative effects however have and will tend towards restrictions versus a lowering or absence of them. This is the nature of government service and thinking of people attracted to it. A self-energizing circle of thought.

It is not a matter of ignoring; when unfavorable-for vaccine-orders information is offered, it is denounced as unscientific or labeled as misinformation. If ignored, the information can grow. The many of you noted how the 45th USA President chose not to ignore criticism, rude attacks and insults in many cases, deciding deliberately to contradict, denounce and counter-claim against them. This greatly limited the ability of such accusations to gain a foothold in ways such methods were used previously with greater, more effective success. 

Information bad for proponents and manufacturers of vaccines will employ the same method, as they have been. This will increase for a time. 

Q3.       Will the EU and WHO allow/accept alternative vaccines to mRNA such as the nasal spray being developed for Covid or the Chinese pill?
C:         Yes, if these methods will allow a government to maintain a position of authority and likewise allow the financial benefits accruing to some decision makers, to continue.

Q4.       Will the fuel crisis affect the supply chain distribution or manufacturing of the Covid vaccines/booster shots?
C:         No. When this crisis arises, the pandemic worry will evaporate quickly, what of it remains.

Q5.       Why is South Africa being targeted now with this new variant? How many more variants will be part of the political agenda for control and compliance?
C:         The variant is mutating everywhere, South Africa is just the location where it was detected. Virus mutate as a normal existence of viruses, of nearly all types. Yes, every new identifiable variant will be named then used to re-energize concern, worry and calls for imposition of restrictions and mandates.

Q6.       How difficult will they make medical exemptions to be allowed for the vaccine?
C:         As difficult as needed to prevent non-compliance leading to general resistance across a population. This development will turn on what a medical exemption means, however few medical conditions will be allowed to qualify. You have noted the ongoing suggestions, orders and even commands for subsequent injections, called boosters.

Q7.       I am confused as to why political leaders are saying that the vaccines are now valid only for 6 months requiring multiple booster shots as well as natural immunity. Is this only for monetary reasons? Or is there an actual valid scientific argument?
C:         The injection attempts to re-engineer the immune response from the back-end, as we have explained before. The immune system of humans and nearly all animals with such defense capability, do not operate this way. Immune system response functions on a front-end trigger basis, the way all vaccines have worked until this one. When no matching intruder appears, the immune system shuts down, in those cases where the genetic therapy was able to enhance the speed and ability of response. In some cases, the vaccine harms a person who has already developed natural immunity through immune system response and blueprinting of the intruder. In other cases it causes no harm but no help. It does temporarily help certain individuals but cannot strengthen the immune system, which is why many cases of vaccinated patients become infected and die. A compromised immune system often does not respond well, whether back-engineered or front end triggered. 
 
The science arguments are used to justify the decisions, but are sketchy at best and often not true, however the financial gain for commanders overrides this.