(1). What is meant by the term twin flame?
Regarding the Matthew Books site: It seems a mother brings forth communications from her deceased son which is also the basis for the site Channeling Erik.
(2) If Matthew and Erik are both souls communicating with humanity from heaven to assist humanity it seems logical that they should both be on the same page so -to-speak. What’s different between the level of awareness Erik has and shares to his mother and humanity and the level of awareness Matthew shares if they are both in Heaven?
(3) Matthew begins his messages using this phrase: “With loving greetings from all souls at this station, this is Matthew.”
The dictionary’s 2nd definition for station as a noun is:
“a place or building where a specified activity or service is based.
"a research station in the rainforest"
(4). Are Erik and Matthew at the same station?
(5). I thought that souls have more awareness than souls in incarnation, and if that’s true why would any soul like Matthew provide and use these terms/ buzzwords if they are used to control?
Oops. Question #3 is: what station is he referring to?
Hi Linda... A Twin Flame could be what is described as a close soul from your soul group that is meant to push your buttons, to help with uplifting your soul to the next level of consciounsess which is to realise we energy beings (Love) having a human experience Some say we can have many Twin Flames, some say just ONE which is the other half of your soul. There are Soulmates, Twin Souls, Twin Flames, Twin Rays and even Eternal Flames. Different people give different meanings to those terminologies. At the end of the day we are all mirrors and twin flames to each other. Twin Flame can also be guides and souls that are not incarnate.
That Matthew being may use the word station because he is on a ship or he might just like to use that word for the space he resides in in spirit. . Because we are all one Matthew would know about Erik and vice versa but they might be in different dimensions. I suggest you meditate and ask Erik or Matthew yourself.
The Twin Flame concept is one of the most hotly contested concepts among mediums.
There is so much agreement on so many subjects, but twin flames isn't one of them. I've given up on trying to know.
I will say that there was one NDE out of the many I've seen that intrigued me. The man who experienced the NDE seemed like a very humble person. His NDE was extensive - he was taken to more places than most.
Anyway, he said he was shown that we all have a main partner. He didn't call it a "twin flame". He was given information about who his partner was, though he was not with her in this lifetime.
The only thing I have heard consistently is that often souls will have many lifetimes where they are romantically partnered with the same soul because they are very comfortable with each other and work well together. But there are also lives where they don't incarnate together at all.
So that means when you are looking at couples, some couples will be truly compatible because of many lifetimes together, and other couples won't have that advantage, but will learn a lot by being with each other.
I've always noticed that some couples have a more effortless connection. This is not to say there's never disagreement, but that they have an easier time overall. Within my own family, I'd say my grandparents and my mother and her second husband had that kind of ease.
Also, there's a lot of harmful ideas around the Twin Flame concept.
One terrible belief is that among twin flame couples, often one is the runner and one is the chaser . . . until eventually the runner stops running. It's a recipe for fooling oneself and wasting years waiting for an emotionally unavailable person to "see the light".
Enlightenment, ascension, and lightworker ... I see these words thrown around by these so-called "spiritual gurus" all the time. I wonder if any self-proclaimed lightworker has ever put "Lightworker" in the Occupation Title section of their U.S. federal tax returns. I'm guessing nope!!!
Here's what I found. Then maybe you could say his position is in Heaven?
"To understand all the jobs the word station has, check out its past — station comes from the Latin stationem for "a job or position," via the word stare which means "to stand.” A station can be where trains “stand,” or a police station where police do their job. Your station in life is your social place."
Yes RB he’s in Heaven but so is everyone and everything. Just the use of the word station doesn’t help either because he never states what his job or position or social place is. Perhaps to some it doesn’t matter but it does to me.
I'm no expert on Matthew's Messages. I've read a little here and there, but I'm not a regular reader.
However, I know he describes his work in Heaven as helping souls that cross over. If I recall correctly, he said he's worked with different types of situations like children or people crossing over who had traumatic deaths. He's described the healing environment where he works with these souls. They spend time there healing before moving on to the wider Heaven. I assume that's what he means by "station", but I'm not 100% sure.
There are books also. One book describes Heaven, but I haven't read any of them.
@Lorri. I have read the first Matthew book out of curiosity. It was a nice and easy read. What I didnt like about it is it states that souls who enter as children (early death) stay in the form of children.
I didnt like the Anthony Borgia´s book Unseen Worlds. It was very boring and dense which was also recommended on this forum.
I liked the Borgia books (there's at least two of them).
Good to know that about the Matthew book. The idea of a soul remaining in the form of a child is nonsense . . . especially if you believe in soul's having many incarnations. Did the book give any reason?
TYPO: "Souls" Ignore the apostrophe.
I've heard the name Gaia quite a bit. I wonder what TC could explain about her/it? Thanks!!
"Gaia" is another name for Earth, or the soul of Earth.
Thanks, fellow readers for your input. I found Mathew’s own description of his “station”…
“ This station” is not a place, it is a group of souls numbering in the millions that have evolved to the same status spiritually and consciously. Some are members of vast, powerful civilizations, some are living within a collective soul group in physical or nonphysical worlds, and some are free spirits that don’t need even an etheric body to accomplish soul contract missions.”
And in another messages Matthew says, “ We add this vital point: Extraterrestrial scientists among you have greatly reduced the toxicity of that vaccine supply and erased the chips’ programming.” Really?
That site using buzzwords (which are used to control) also throw Trump and Israel under the buss while lifting Obama and then after providing their station’s view of who‘s good and who’s bad they then go into how we shouldn’t take sides. Yikes… So sneaky.
Matthew describes Nirvana this way: “the placement now known as Nirvana was manifested in antiquity as a safe haven for wounded and exhausted light warriors. When it no longer was needed for that purpose, the highest universal council decided its proximity to the planet later called Earth would make it an ideal place for the population to live between physical lifetimes. As the planet itself became one of the universe’s best schoolhouses and souls flocked to incarnate there, the spirit world’s overseers kept adding diversity in lifestyle, housing, attractions, scenery, and manifestation and growth opportunities. Eventually Nirvana became known as one of this universe’s finest spirit worlds, and it’s considered by some to be the crown jewel.
Here’s what TC provided: “Nirvana = Heaven but on Earth assessable to humans.”
Matthew’s station isn’t for me. To each his own. Just my two cents 🤷♀️
LOL. I agree with their assessment of Israel, so that didn't trip me up.
Of the things that give me pause, is Matthew's assertion that some world leaders have been murdered and a clone put in their place. Putin is one of them.
Even if a clone was made, it would still have to grow up. Any clone of Putin would be so much younger than him that it couldn't plausibly step in for him.
That's just Coo Coo For Cocoa Puffs.
Matthew also constantly says ETs are here on Earth dismantling all sort of harmful things humans create, which I don't believe.
🙄 Correction: that should have been accessible
Nirvana = Heaven, but on Earth accessible to humans.
It's inevitable, every message received by a medium/channeler goes through a human filter. The message is only as pure as the channel is able to "get out of the way." Use your own discernment.
I’ve heard that too, Renie but I don’t think that’s true even though it’s often repeated. As Paul Selig says, channeling is like taking dictation or like being a radio that tunes into a certain station. If we don’t like or agree with what the radio plays we can just tune to a different station (there’s that word station again) but the radio isn’t responsible for the broadcast. It’s like humans will always assume it’s the other human -the channel(er) that is the issue because s/he has some filter that is getting in the way rather than ever questioning the integrity of the source of the material given. And if the human channeler misrepresented or mis quoted what the source intended to communicate the human channel(er) would be corrected. If that doesn’t happen the station wants it that way.
I made a response about this last night but it doesn’t seem to have gone through so I’ll try again….
I don’t agree about the human channeler “getting in the way” or having filters as the issue. The channeler is only the radio. The radio isn’t the broadcast. The broadcast comes from the station that the radio is tuned into. We can always tune to a different station.
Can anyone point to an example of a channeler getting in the way or having filters that distort the channeling?
It is widely accepted that no medium can be 100% correct. The broadcast itself is clear, but the "radio receiver" can be faulty under certain circumstances.
If a medium has any strongly held beliefs, those beliefs can possibly distort their ability to hear the truth on that subject if the truth is contrary to their beliefs.
When Erik started sending messages through Jamie Butler on Channeling Erik, he said he liked working with her because she had fewer blockages than most mediums.
As far as an example, I always felt one of the channels on CE was terrible. Whenever she appeared, I didn't bother watching because I felt anything coming from her was worthless. I wasn't the only audience member who felt that - she was quite controversial at the time.
The channeler is the radio, and the broadcast is filtered through, and subject to interpretation by the channel. The ability of the channel to "get out of the way" is variable based on skill, distractions, prejudices, pressures to perform, etc.
Also, to further complicate things, the messages received by the channel may not always be of the highest order. Always a good thing to call in your GAG's, pray, raise your vibes, before invoking the spirit world.
Exactly. Even the physical devices called "radios" can fail and only pick up static so you can't hear the broadcast clearly or at all.
Yet someone else with a perfectly functioning radio can pick up the broadcast clearly.
Same thing spiritually.
I read about the term "ascension to the Fifth Dimensional Earth" often. I would appreciate very much if Patrick could help translate this term for me.
Thanks so much.
I love NDE stories! Where is a good place on line to read some? Thanks!
RB, I love them, too...I find good stories online at the Victor and Wendy Zammit Afterlife Report (free weekly newsletter). Enjoy!
Thanks Renie!!! Looking forward to it!!!
I tend to watch NDE stories and medium channelings on YouTube.
Favorite YouTube channels are: Next Level Soul Podcast, Anne Tucker (medium), Love Covered Life Podcast
The first and second on the list are about equal NDE accounts and mediums.
CORRECTION: The first and THIRD on the list are about 50/50 between NDEs and mediums.
Anne Tucker is strictly a medium with her own YouTube channel, but she has appeared on Next Level Soul Podcast.
Anthony Chene Productions on YouTube.
Thanks Lorri and Jude!! Looks like I have a lot to keep me busy!!
These new "buzzwords" are emerging to try to understand and define the inexplicable evolution taking place.
Astrology Predictions of Donald Trump and 2024 Election:
Astrology Predictions of Joe Biden and the 2024 Election:
These readings are very interesting.
The Joe Biden reading was done two months ago and it's amazing considering the news that just came out about Biden's mental disabilities.
She saw news coming out that had been kept quiet. The April eclipse will greatly affect Biden and bring out more. He also has issues in his house of health and work and she sees him letting go or ending something. His astrology on election day doesn't look like anything remarkable is happening.
Kamala Harris's astrology shows her either suddenly gaining more power or having to take on more responsibility.
Trump's astrology shows him having a very hard year, and then suddenly having great astrological influences on election day. He also has similar astrological influences as when he ran for the 2016 election.
To Renie and Lorri,
Double quotation marks…..A direct quote is a word- for-word report of what someone else said or wrote. You use the exact words and punctuation of the original.
1). Notice that on the Matthew Book site , the use of quotation marks are used around the questioner’s words /the channelers words. Not Matthews responses.
2.). If the channeler/radio got it wrong because of their filter or bias or whatever wouldn’t Matthew (the broadcaster) correct what was said and do it immediately or at least before the next post was put out?
If this isn’t the right or accurate information from Matthew, why does Matthew allow it to stand?
Linda, exactly my point--if Matthew's mom who is the channeler has certain beliefs, or agendas, then who's to say that her own thoughts haven't blended in with the channeled messages she receives from her son? All we know is what Matthew's mom chooses to publish on her website.
“ who's to say that her own thoughts haven't blended in with the channeled messages she receives from her son? ”
That would be Matthew and his “station”. But since they haven’t made corrections then they de facto approve of the blended message which contains bias and agendas.
Unless you were to tune in to Matthew yourself, I suppose you would never know if he corrected his message or not. The whole thing is entirely in the hands of his mother who writes the post as far as I'm concerned :-)
My take on it is that a medium with a strong bias isn't capable of hearing any correction from whomever they're channeling.
Some mediums will purposely avoid reading or watching news so they don't form personal opinions and can hear more accurately. They are willing to be uninformed to boost their accuracy.
Jaime Butler avoids media input and will freely admit she doesn't know things, but it's on purpose.
It's a sacrifice on the part of mediums who do this.
Sounds like our own Patrick.....
@RB, what part sounds like Patrick?
Oh, I believe he mentioned years ago he doesn't watch much news and then he wrote this at the beginning of the "Buzzwords" post:
"I don’t watch, read or listen to much New Age material (the definition varies) and not for some
time now, my consumption has dropped to almost zero on the “enlightenment” meter."
No doubt to keep his mind clear I'm guessing.
I limit my news consumption to almost all written, I almost never watch broadcast news and I make an effort to see what's being offered by both top wing and bottom wing publications, including immoderate. Or is it moderate, left and right wing? You just can't let others label stuff or decide for you.
As far as "New Age" material, I find nearly all of it as boring as watching paint dry or grass grow; my non-consumption has nothing to do with "mind clearing" or being influenced.
For most of life, it's always been an advantage and a problem, simultaneously, that I don't naturally come under the influence of whatever popular, common opinion or notion is in vogue.
So Trump won handily. Mail in votes ushered in massive fraud which upended the result. None of us here will be in the least bit surprised. https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/mail-ballot-fraud-study-finds-trump-almost-certainly-won-2020
At the end of 2020 about 164 million voters were registered in the USA. I saw many press & news orgs mention Biden receiving 81 million votes to Trump's 72. That's 153, which is like 92-93% of 164. 🤔
If what I could research is correct, never in the history of the USA has an election for national office seen registered voter turnout approach 70%, I believe about 66% is the highest ever.
The same explanation gap applies to the global climate warming change crowd, who never address or attempt to explain warmth ➡️ higher water evaporation ➡️ more precipitation ➡️ thus plant growth & oxygen release plus CO₂ consumption, a process which occurs constantly. Also mentioned are methane and CO₂ output from a volcanic eruption.
It too many circles, it's a social taboo to suggest Biden didn't win legitimately or that global warming is horse manure; s/he who suggests it is crazy.
Thus the photo of Crazy Eddie on the 11 Feb post....
I often think about the popular versus electorate votes issue, too. If 9 million voters opted for Biden, it might not be so bad that Biden cheated on the electorate votes. But 90+% voters turnout in the US seems too high. Of course, my lack of imagination makes me underestimate the ability of Illuminati to stuff the ballot box (or the vote counting software) with millions of non-existant votes.