07 December 2016
Fidel Castro (1926-2016) was a Cuban politician and revolutionary who governed the Republic of Cuba as Prime Minister from 1959 to 1976, then as President until 2008. A Marxist-Leninist and Cuban nationalist, he was also First Secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba from 1961 until 2011. Under his administration, Cuba became a one-party socialist state, in which industry and business were confiscated and/or nationalized and state socialist reforms were imposed.
Q: Mr. Castro, my thanks for answering this call to arms, in the battle of understanding and enlightenment.
FC: You are welcome, it is my pleasure and honor to be asked to speak.
Q: What would you name as the great disappointment or failure of your regime in Cuba, and its greatest success & achievement?
FC: The failure was to not achieve better relationships with the United States. Achievement? To gain power.
Q: Isn't power the means to achieve other things, for common benefit?
FC: Of course, but so what? If the power is not chased, if there is no lust for the power, it will not be reached. All of the good intentions are worthless if they cannot be put into action, and that, my friend, requires power.
Q: You sound as if you are speaking about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
FC: Thank you, my point.
Q: At what stage in life did you decide you wanted to take over Cuba?
FC: As a teenager, and I got serious about it when I was twenty or so.
Q: Was it your life plan & purpose?
FC: Yes, of course.
Q: Were you the only one who would reach this place in the 1960s?
FC: No, there were others who did not reach this plateau in their life plans, even though it was a provision they had included.
Q: Were you planning, before this most recent life, to remain in power for as long you did?
FC: No, I expected to step down earlier or to be killed.
Q: After formally passing power to your brother Raúl, how much authority did you really retain?
FC: Most of what I had before, and the ability to intercede anytime I chose. I could override his decision any time I pleased.
Q: When did you truly step out of the circle of authority, and never consider questioning decisions any more?
FC: Only a few months before my death. Until that point, I remained connected to and aware of what went on. I had to.
Q: Why did you have to?
FC: The populace was so accustomed to my presence and leadership, they could at any moment clamor for information from Fidel, about nearly any event. If I did not offer any words, advice or instruction, it would have been the end of me. I would have passed on shortly after relinquishing control. It was what fed my continued existence.
Q: Looking back on the course Cuba took, would you have pursued a different economic policy to allow development to flourish, for more prosperity to come to the people of the nation?
Q: Critics argue that you achieved massive equality, by seeing to it that almost everyone was equally poor.
Q: This does not bother you?
FC: No, it was the objective.
Q: Why make Cuba poor?
FC: It was poor except for the people deposed and their corrupt supporters. I brought them out of their abusive bubble of delight.
Q: Did you conceal your Marxist Leninist ideas as you rose to power?
FC: Battled my way to power. We did not prevail at the ballot box. No, I was always understood to believe what I stated.
Q: Why couldn't Fulgencio Batista be replaced by you at the ballot box?
FC: We would have never gotten to the ballot box.
Q: Why not?
FC: In sixty years of Cuba independence, the habit of imperial rule was never broken. The USA's imposition of leaders early in Cuba's independence only replaced the centuries long dominance from Spain, and in several ways, reinforced it. The US military power and proximity made certain Cubans would see true authority as lying offshore. The string of dictators, ending with Fulgencio Batista, was a continuance of the strong man policy.
Q: You were not a dictator?
FC: Yes, but I meant before me. I was in power almost 50 years. I was king, not a dictator.
Q: Do you believe there will be significant change in Cuba now that you are no longer a presence, only a memory, albeit a very strong one?
FC: Yes, but Cuba has been changing since the moment I came to power. Significant change? You mean foreign companies come invest and then extract their profits, leaving Cubans with almost nothing?
Q: It doesn't sound like you've changed much. I mean a more capitalist-like economy, and less socialist control.
FC: This has been happening for quite some time, and will continue.
Q: What did you think of the recent visit by the president of the USA?
FC: Showmanship, which is important to the showman. I was one, and I appreciated that.
Q: Benefit to Cuba from the visit?
FC: Not much.
Q: The United States took control of and ultimately made a territorial possession of a similar, if smaller Spanish island in the Caribbean around the same time Cuba gained its independence from Spain, at least on paper. True independence for Cuba came after the First World War, and over the next century, development and wealth on Puerto Rico have grown so far ahead of what Cuba lost after you came to power, it suggests your regime was a step back, not forward.
FC: Yes, it does suggest that.
Q: Do you agree?
FC: Yes. Money grew for the people who cared about money. Yes.
Q: You did not care about money?
FC: No, not for its own sake. For what it provided, yes because people believed in it, yes. I knew what would motivate others in the common interest, and that is money. It has been, since money was invented, to represent what people would do.
Q: Which was your favorite US president?
FC: JFK. His reaction to my deal with the Soviets, the Russians, that supplied me with a lot of fuel. It was very helpful early in my regime, and worked out just as I hoped.
Q: The history of your regime is well documented from all sides, so is there an angle to it you believe is not well addressed? Not treated fairly or properly?
FC: The detractors, the critics and the dissidents in exile, have many good arguments but they never convinced anybody inside Cuba to enough extent, that their points-of-view were better. I did convince plenty of people, and many of them, to take up arms and fight for my cause. The US press spoke as much propaganda and lies as truth, so I stopped them from coming to tell even more lies. If the millions of people of Cuba were really opposed to the revolution, they could have stopped participating. I did not wave a magic wand and compel everyone in my administration to act as my puppet. I also did not threaten everyone under my control; this only works for a short time. A few years maybe, and then power corrodes and crumbles. I did not have this difficulty, and it is because the large majority supported me. Many Cubans were energized and acted out of desire and good faith.
Q: What about your decision to empty Cuban prisons once you saw the Mariel boatlift working, that refugees fleeing the island were truly making it to the USA?
FC: Makes good sense, if you can send the filth to another country. Isn't the new president of the USA going to do that?
Q: But you sent Cuban citizens.
FC: Who were happy to go. They could have stayed in Cuba.
Q: In prison.
FC: They committed serious crimes.
Q: There were many reports of people imprisoned for politics and ideology.
FC: Yes, but they were also conspiring to commit serious offenses, which is a crime in the USA also, isn't it?
Q: If there is one thing you could do differently, what would it be?
FC: Invite foreign business into Cuba differently, not the way it was done.
FC: I did not account for the way Cubans would be offered jobs or work in business where foreign investment was made. I would have encouraged the investors to bring their workers to Cuba in a bigger way than happened.
Q: I don't think many investors brought many people to Cuba, few would go.
FC: Then the investors should have not come in the first place.
Q: What awaits Cuba now that the USA is poised to shift policy and strategy in very different direction?
FC: This depends on the USA. If they seek to lift development and involvement with Cuba, they will have a good reception but they must understand they cannot do so and control things as if they were in Kansas. They must accept Cuba as they encounter it.
Q: Mr. Castro, any final words or message for either the world or Cuba?
FC: For Cuba, ¡que viva la Revolución! For the world, walk in the place and shoes of your target, to know his path and how he feels as he follows it.
Q: Gracias, Señor Castro.
FC: De nada, un gusto. Adiós.
07 December 2016
No, Pearl Harbor is not going to be mentioned today. (Oooops.... :-\)
In mid-2015 Trump's rise to the US presidency was predicted here. Below is a link to a news article about forecasts from well informed people.
As information about extraterrstrials, spirits, Heaven, our souls and mankind's place in the galaxy & universe become more common, so will opinions. Just as were offered for the recent US presidential election. This website, the books with previous channelings (and upcoming also) will come under a similar barrage of analysis, opinion, forecast and conclusions that involved the election.
Listen to your inner voice above all, after listening to the voices which surround you. This will remove confusion and make you more calm.
01 December 2016
I understand scientific information is not everyone's favorite snack, but it's a cookie I really like. I ask that you indulge my quirk or skip this post, if it isn't your slice of bread.
A reader sent a great article about a new technology for fuel-free outer space travel. I ask The Committee to explain this, and what's going to develop.
EmDrive thruster that could revolutionize space exploration defies laws of physics – NASA paper
NASA's Eagleworks paper on EmDrive space propulsion technology has finally been published. It shows that the electromagnetic drive rocket propulsion system actually works, but seemingly violates Newton's Third Law of Motion.
First proposed in 1999, the EmDrive uses electromagnetic waves as fuel and bounces microwaves inside a cone-shaped metal container to create thrust.
A leaked version of the long-awaited report was released on a NASA Spaceflight forum earlier this month, but the peer reviewed open source paper, entitled "Measurement of Impulsive Thrust from a Closed Radio-Frequency Cavity in Vacuum," has now been published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).
Although the level of thrust was quite low, it has been revealed that the NASA Eagleworks lab was consistently able to generate 1.2 millinewtons per kilowatt of thrust in a vacuum.
"Thrust data from forward, reverse, and null suggested that the system was consistently performing at 1.2 ± 0.1 mN∕kW, which was very close to the average impulsive performance measured in air,” the paper reads, adding “a number of error sources were considered and discussed."
The EMDrive is a time machine as well as a "teleporter" as well as a space warp drive. We will venture out. pic.twitter.com/GZmnJgzSXW
— SFC John Titor (@JohnRenzi2036) November 18, 2016
The system apparently defies Newton's third law, which holds that everything must have an equal and opposite reaction. Generating thrust momentum in one direction requires something to be expelled, such as a propellant or exhaust, but the EM Drive doesn't do this.
The paper doesn't explain how this is possible, but suggests the "supporting physics model used to derive a force based on operating conditions in the test article can be categorized as a nonlocal hidden-variable theory, or pilot-wave theory for short."
The team behind the paper were testing to see if the drive actually works, rather than striving to attain the greatest performance, meaning that the system can likely be made even more efficient.
Should the EM Drive be found to work, it would advance space exploration by eliminating the need for heavy rocket fuel, allowing for lighter space vehicles that could take astronauts as far as Mars more quickly than possible with current technology.
The paper notes that more research is needed to determine exactly how EmDrive actually works, and whether it is really producing thrust, as it's possible that thermal expansion may be affecting the results.
The EmDrive is scheduled to be tested in space in the next few months. Should it work there, skeptics in the science community will have to figure out how the drive generates thrust without exhaust.
[There are some cool pictures also, if you click the link to the original article.]
As I read it, The Committee said: "Mankind will discover that laws of physics do not apply outside certain ranges of vibration. This device will be a step in that direction."
Now to the Q&A:
Q: Esteemed Committee of science, why does this method violate Newton's Third Law?
C: We would say, Newton's laws are not violated, this method involves energies and forces not considered by Newton. His rules, if these are correctly called that, are valid inside the parameters of matter, as understood in his time.
Q: But there is no time.
C: Inside the human perception of it, of course there is.
Q: What is electromagnetic energy?
C: Electricity without wires.
Q: It's not that simple.
C: Yes, it is. Electricity is the bumping of electrons inside a material which supports the process without disintegrating. Just as plastics are not affected by contact with water, however soap is. The electrons only jump one, or in some cases, a few atoms. The cause is so not important, the effect is what matters.
Q: So what is electromagnetic energy?
C: It is the same energy which drives electrons, which skips over and through the medium in which its users detect it. This is why it travels through solids, liquids and gaseous mediums such as buildings, water and air. Electricity results when this energy makes contact with metals, substances more receptive and reactive to it, because the atomic arrangement.
Q: Radio signals?
Q: How does this device work?
C: It creates opposing forces. Electricity forced against itself will produce powerful effects, even with what are considered to be low power currents. This is well known on Earth, and is commonly considered a short circuit. If two powerful currents, of say fifty million watts, were forced into contact at the same polarity, positive to positive and negative to negative, a strong explosion would result, capable of severely damaging or destroying equipment used to either generate or transport the electricity.
In an electromagnetic field, this physical effect is avoided, because no physical components are present.
Q: OK, go on….
C: This device creates the release of energy much the same way an electrical explosion releases energy, without physical components. The release of the energy nevertheless acts upon physical devices, much the way electromagnetic energy, or simply magnetism, act on solids encountered.
This is what produces thrust. It is directed, as the illustration displays. A firecracker explosion will disperse its energy in all directions nearly equally, but for slightly higher resistances in the paper wrapping around the gun powder. These differences are negligible. An exploding stick of dynamite is similar.
Gunpowder ignited inside a chamber will cause its rupture, and when an intentional port is provided - the barrel of a firearm, for example - the energy will propel a projectile and produce an equal reaction, what is called recoil.
This is basic physics, as you all know.
This device does the same, however with directed electromagnetic energy.
Q: Is this what space travelers use to traverse the galaxy?
C: Yes, it is one method. We refer to the human television series, Star Trek. In this program, there are two methods of propulsion, warp speed and impulse. This method is what would be called impulse power. It will efficiently produce velocities that approach and reach the human expected speed of light.
Q: The device generates electricity to create a magnetic field?
C: Yes, essentially that is correct. The two magnetic fields oppose one another, and the resulting release provides propulsion, much the same way heat energy achieves the effect. Rocket fuel combusts, the expanding heat effect pushes against the one side of the combustion chamber as it is discharged in the opposite direction.
Equal and opposite reaction, as the Earth physicist Newton stated.
Q: Why does this device not produce an opposite reaction?
C: It does, however it cannot be measured, or detected. Not yet.
Q: What is the reaction produced, as a by product of the thrust?
C: An electromagnetic signal, at a frequency higher than the source signals which create the effect.
Q: Like multiplication?
C: Yes, and this frequency can be compared to a human inability to hear what an animal detects. The ability to detect this residual electromagnetic discharge will come as the device is perfected.
Q: OK, you said this would be the equivalent of impulse drive. How then does warp drive operate?
C: It operates in a similar way, however the source energy and multiplication utilize nuclear fission and crystals, to create then amplify the energy to achieve velocities above the human perceived limit of three hundred thousand kilometers per second.
Q: This device could be used to explore the solar system pretty easily.
Q: We can reach the sun in a little over 8 minutes? Saturn in an hour and a half? Jupiter in less than one hour?
C: Yes, however the alignments of the planets will alter these travel intervals. Yes, humans will easily rise, eat breakfast on Earth, visit these planets and return home for dinner at the same table.
Q: How fast will the warp drive work?
C: Time as humans understand it will be suspended. Trajectories, geometry and the notions of straight versus curved will be distorted and suspended, when compared to what is now understood. These concepts will only have meaning when returning to Earth and making comparisons based on Earth time, location and vibrational levels.
Essentially, the galaxy will be reached over similar time intervals, with warp speeds, as points inside your solar system are reached with impulse drive propulsion.
Q: Why can't the warp drive be used to cross the solar system?
C: By the time velocity is reached, it will require slowing down and as that happens, the traveling vessel will have already reached Alpha Centauri. It would be like using a racing motorcycle to cross a room, or a small airplane to travel five hundred meters.
The limitation to space exploration will not be ability to develop thrust; it will be navigation.
Q: Are our alien ET cousins going to demonstrate any of this to mankind?
C: Of course, it is a planned step in the opening of relations and intercourse between the many civilizations.
Q: Esteemed Committee, thank you for your time and explanation. I cannot wait to see all this, but I will!
C: Be well one and all, and do return.
19 November 2016
25-30 years ago there was a pair movies about time travel called "Back to the Future". One character secretly retrieved a sports records book from decades ahead, becoming rich and powerful with it.
In practice, such information would set off a stampede until word spread it was consistently accurate, at which point no more bets would be accepted. If it were published, about a dozen correct predictions could be enough to end sports, not just betting on them. Nobody sane purposely plays or makes wagers, in order to lose.
In addition to predictions here about Brexit, Donald Trump and the US baseball championship, readers have now asked about upcoming elections in France and Italy, not to mention (but I will) English and American football, Alabama USA snowfall and now, Europe.
Wagers have been around longer than money; several are big business, such insurance and futures trading.
It is unethical (and often illegal) to bet or trade with insider information, even without generally accepted objective, impartial criteria to prove it. Few people believe information comes from & through a medium. How many inaccurate "psychic" predictions were issued about Clinton vs. Trump? I'd bet (pun intended) more than a few.
Betting is fine when both sides stand an equal chance. Additional accurate predictions here will create a serious disadvantage against an unaware bet maker.
Turning to reader questions, The Committee says "The Italian prime minister is confident his initiative will prevail, and for this reason has launched it. He is not planning to lose thus resign. The Italian population is deeply concerned about economics and will vote to pursue a solution."
About France, they say: "The cultural differences between the United Kingdom and Continental Europe figured in the decision to depart; although these were not its prime motivator, such perceived differences were a component. There is less cultural difference between Brussels and France, yet this aspect is causing a similar effect, because of the very strong identity the French hold, more threatened each day. The French will vote to strengthen and reaffirm their national identity."
Interpret outcomes as you understand the issues and choices.
17 November 2016
Chapter 5 drew a stream of comments about the election prediction, so here are questions (and answers) taken from those comments, addressed separately.
By the way, thank you all for the kind comments and feedback related to the election. I was especially amused by a Hillary supporter sporting a grin the next day and others suffering criticism the better part of a year and half at the hands of coworkers, family and friends; the comeuppance must have been interesting to experience.
Since then, the 20 questions have also been addressed in a Channeling Erik video. I heard a lot of consistency and few contradictions (Trump's a "racist" - The Committee says "Trump has ideas and attitudes which the current human climate and environment around Trump, wish to define as racism for being less than the pure love deemed necessary for racism to be absent, however Trump has never maligned, mistreated, denied or excluded people on the basis of race." BUT have a listen! YouTube, Channeling Erik in the search field).
On to the Q&A George, Santanu, Pierluigi and others await, some eagerly:
Q1. So, in simple words, can we say that "heaven" is simply made up of atoms in which the velocity of the electrons are very high compared to our world? Or are there other things which differ ?
A: No. The forces which move the electrons, protons and neutrons of atoms, and create those three building blocks, or components of atoms, are the forces of Heaven. The energy which creates and is Heaven. As we have said here previously, years before in your time, the composition of the pieces of atoms, is rotating triangles. The forces which create the rotation, forces which push along the points of each three sided shape - those points themselves also a smaller rotating triangle - are what comprise Heaven.
Q2. As per the physics we know, the velocity of the electron cannot exceed that of light. In hydrogen it's about 2000 kilometers per second or about 1/137th velocity of light. As we provide more and more energy to the atom, the electron rotates faster but grows heavier too. Theoretically it approaches infinite mass when velocity approaches that of light. So what kind of velocity are we talking about here when we say high velocity of electron ?
A: Yes, an electron can exceed the human perception of the speed of light. Humans cannot perceive or measure this, and thus consider it an absolute limit. This is no different than saying certain frequencies of light do not exist because they cannot be seen, however invisible light was discovered to exist everywhere.
Infinite mass only applies inside the gravity perception of the Earth environment, and similar environments all over the galaxy and universe. Above the Earth environment, velocity reduces mass, energy goes down, not up, with higher velocity. This is reason your human word light refers to less weight and also visible photons of electromagnetic energy.
Once the velocity of an electron exceeds 300,000 meters per second, its physical properties are altered, and the object it helps compose vanishes from the Earth environment; it disappears yet still exists. This is the reason souls and spirits are invisible until their velocity is temporarily slowed to match the environment a human requires to see them. An example is how your Guardian Angel reveals her or himself to your sight and vision.
Q3. To travel long distances fast, we are supposed to tune in to the unique signature of every object and then match the signature of our vessel (or raise the frequency) to that of the object and off we go. But how to match the frequency of the vessel to its destination ?
A: This is very simple, once the ability to measure the energy signature of the destination object is achieved. It is done by creating a smaller, matched signature, or a fraction of the signature or formula of the target. Just as two is a smaller proportion of twenty, 256,889,723 is a smaller proportion of 25,688,972,300. This is done electromagnetically, just as a transmitter of radio or television signals broadcasts a frequency which aligns with or matches a receiver, a good example is a two way radio.
As it refers to long distance space travel, the destination signature or frequency is fixed, so tuning the traveling vessel to match is all that is necessary.
Q4. By "raising the frequency" do you mean to say that we speed up the velocity of the electrons of the atoms of the vessel?
A: No, the velocity of the electrons in the traveling vessel, capsule or ship remains the same. If what you suggested were done, the physical temperature would kill all life aboard and the vessel would disintegrate. What is changed is the energetic frequency of the electromagnetic energy, not the physical substance.
Q5. Is the 'frequency based on the speed in which quantum particles 'pop' in and out of our [visible]dimension or the speed of established particles move within an atomic structure? I [perceive] our [visible] space/time as a focused slice of the sine wave based on the particle appearance and disappearance. Higher or lower vibrations have always caused me some confusion when it comes to application on this "plane" for lack of a better word.
A: Frequency means the inherent energetic vibration. Think of sound waves, a good example. Sound is energy moving through a medium, such as air or water and so forth. The medium itself is not what the energy is; the medium reflects the passage of the energy through it.
The frequencies involved are higher than can be seen or reflected through the relative density of physical matter in the Earth environment, including plasma.
Q6. Short answer: there is something like the Heisemberg indetermination principle in the higher dimensions? (The Heisenberg principle states that the more precisely the position of some particle is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be known, and vice versa). I suppose the Committee know very well the subject when applied on the Earth dimension, and maybe could give an extension of this principle (a more general definition, maybe?)
A: Yes, however, there exists the ability to determine both position and momentum.
Q7. How do we actually do this, by imagination, minds eye, dreams? Or something that can be objectively measured? Is consciousness the 'virtual computer' in this upper environment?Is it saying that geometry can be totally flexible, just like events can be simultaneous? So without a fixed distance between a and b, speed is not required? Is it saying consciousness is fundamental? So time, distance, mass are local? "Release density from the equation" - does that mean liberate mass from E=mc2?
A: It can be done as you suggest, however inside the Earth dimensional environment, physical equipment is required to move the physical body. The vessel moving across space creates a bubble of lower velocity energy and density in which humans thrive, much the way a jet aircraft creates a necessary environment of temperature, oxygen and air velocity for passengers, who would perish very quickly without it.
Yes, objective measurement is a normal part of the process and devices, as is the case with all mechanical devices and the forces involved their use and operation.
The consciousness of the human soul - which is not solely human, it can manifest or incarnate as many tings or none - also uses these energetic principles, however that is far beyond the physical inhabitants and beings of the galaxy and universe, of which humans are a member.
We would say that geometry cab be bent, its theorems and axioms altered.
Distance is not fixed, thus speed, velocity and momentum vary as the points are brought closer or separated.
Time exists only inside the environment which creates a physical method to number it, and mass and distance are function of this numbering, marking or measurement of the illusion. Yes, all are local to the place where measured, and do not apply in other environments.
Yes, the equation that energy equals mass multiplied by the speed of light squared only applies where there is a range of light velocity related to mass. Such as Earth. Where the limits of light velocity are not longer applicable, mass decreases when energy rises. Energy equals mass times velocity to the negative of its square, or E = mc-2 in Earth terms.