The End of Earth
Q: When will the end of Earth come?
C: In terms of years we presume you wish to know?
A: Many millions, in an irrelevant period to your current lives and existence.
C: How will it happen?
Q: The size of the central star will increase, it will expand enormously by comparison to current size. This larger size will not affect Earth, as the sun, your name for your system's core star, can increase its diameter many times and remain very far from Earth. This expansion will be accompanied by a change in the nature of the radiation emitted. Earth's magnetosphere will no longer withstand this effect and life as it exists will not be possible. No organisms shall live in this environment, in the dimensionality of life on Earth today.
Q: Astronomers on Earth have theorized on this subject, suggesting it has happened to many stars, affecting the planets that orbit them.
C: Yes, this is true and has happened.
Q: Has human civilization on Earth already existed for a small portion, half or more of its eventual planned presence?
C: A small portion, in fact only a fraction so far, of the "time" it shall be present. It is accurate to say, in Earth terms, humanity upon it, is in its infancy still.
Q: When humanity on Earth perishes, will it be calamitous or will there be opportunity to escape?
C: Ample opportunity there shall be.
Q: This has happened elsewhere in the galaxy?
C: Yes, it is common.
Q: What evolution of human physicality is likely and how much will we resemble ourselves currently as the end of Earth time nears?
C: The resemblance will be very similar although what are called racial differences will reduce. There will be less importance, less concern and less attention given to this. Physical function will improve and lifespans will lengthen considerably, compared to now. Improvements to medical science, changes in body function at the cellular level and diets & requirements will all feed this expansion of lifetimes.
Q: Why the relatively shorter lifetimes now as compared to the future you describe?
C: Opportunity; the more lives, the greater variety or circumstance, challenge and learning there can be. In just a few centuries of Earth time, average lifespans have grown and this trend shall continue.
Q: We're going to do another post on Lemuria and realize this question could be redundant, but if a small fraction, say three to five percent, of a human presence of five million years is all we've covered, that means humans have been on Earth for one hundred fifty to two hundred fifty thousand years.
C: Two percent and three million, approximately sixty thousand.
Q: Animal and plant life have been here for far longer, yes?
C: Yes, many millions of years and many organisms also, small to very large. Much theory regarding extinctions is accurate, but for timing. Little method is there upon Earth to be accurate. Little need, likewise.
Q: Why do you say there is little need?
C: We suggest reincarnation, where little or nothing of a previous life is or can be recalled, for no purpose does this serve to a current life, in the many cases. Knowledge of it is interesting and we understand the curiosity, as this prevails in many human emotions. This curiosity is remembrance that you know what you have set aside to not "know" but access to and memory of which shall all be returned intact upon your return home.
Q: What will happen to all the souls and being on Earth once the planet is no longer able to be inhabited?
C: Existence and development will be continued and pursued elsewhere, in many dimensions available, as has always happened to all of you.
Q: What will Earth look like?
C: We suggest Mars, where moisture has gone underground and the prevailing color of soil substances is seen widely. Earth shall have this effect also.
Q: Earth was not created for humanity?
C: No. You have come for opportunity and appreciation.
Q: Committee, thank you for telling us about Earth's end.
C: Our pleasure.
A reader asks about Paul Walker, the recently, tragically deceased actor who starred in a series of movies about exotic car thefts, Fast and Furious.
Reader Question: Was Paul Walker the reincarnation of James Dean?
C: No, Mr. Dean was not reborn onto Earth as Paul Walker although we shall say, Mr. Dean's soul did confer with Paul Walker before his birth.
Q: Was the death predestined? Was it foretold this wreck would occur?
Q: Was Mr. Walker's acting in several movies about fast cars and reckless driving part of a life plan, leading to his end?
Q: What purpose did this tragic end serve?
C: To emphasize the dangers of the activity, to serve as a stimulus to additional education about, and awareness of, dangerous operation of vehicles.
RQ: What is Mr. Walker doing now, given his return home?
C: He continues his soul plan, which includes encouraging the education efforts towards safer driving.
RQ: Has he met other celebrities going before him?
C: Yes, souls who were celebrities that he knew, however no celebrity in Heaven exists, as this is understood on Earth and no exclusivity, appeal, attraction or rejection of celebrity operates, as the human view suggests.
Q: Committee, we thank you.
C: Welcome always you are.
Q: When did Lemuria exist on Earth?
C: Approximately thirty millennia ago, in current time on Earth.
Q: Where was it located?
C: Between the US state of Hawaii and New Zealand, and these two places were a little closer at that time.
Q: The movement of tectonic plates is much slower, isn't it? We're told inches each year, maybe several feet, no more than a meter, is the annual shift. Thirty thousand years might mean thirty thousand meters, or thirty km. This is tiny compared to the distance between New Zealand and Hawaii.
C: Correct but for the asteroid, or massive meteor impacts which displaced the two island groups to approximately double the previous distance.
Q: These asteroid impacts ended Lemuria?
C: Yes. Scars as human might call them, remain on the floor of the Pacific Ocean.
Q: What happened to the asteroids?
C: They were ruptured on impact and the broken pieces fell to the bottom of the ocean, what portions were not embedded in the crust.
Q: If we drilled down into these areas, would we locate geological evidence?
C: Yes, however technology, not to mention expense, of drilling in waters of this depth is risky. Human drilling activity in deep water is undertaken for economic gain, extraction of crude oil. With unknown thus likely zero return of information, this activity would not be undertaken in this area.
Q: What was the civilization like?
C: It developed over many millennia, and the time of thirty ago refers to the apogee of development.
It was not as scientifically advanced as Atlantis, although in many ways similar to Earth development today, but for the fusion and fusion of atomic material, nuclear energy.
The civilization had many similarities to today, spiritual awareness and understanding being more widespread, more commonly accepted.
Q: Was Lemuria forgotten, unremembered by the people who created Atlantis?
C: Yes, there was no overlap. Lemuria and most animal life on Earth perished. Atlantis developed elsewhere, independently.
Q: Lemuria was a larger civilization?
C: Yes, There were approximately thirty million in this grouping, on this continent.
Q: What was the size of Atlantis?
C: Five million persons were the core of Atlantean society.
Q: Was most of Earth uninhabited then?
C: Yes, just as now. The greater part of Earth is nearly devoid of human presence now. Aircraft have given the ability to examine more quickly these vast, uninhabited parts of Earth.
Q: What was Earth's total population at the time of Lemuria's destruction?
C: Approximately one hundred million. The majority somewhat nomadic, as were the populations across North America just a few centuries ago.
Q: These asteroid impacts did not eliminate most of the Earth human population?
C: No, approximately half. There were many deaths thereafter, indirectly related to the circumstances brought about.
Q: What remnants of Lemurian civilization remain?
C: Nothing directly, by human methods of bequeathing knowledge, legacy and tradition. Guardian Angel Guide assistance was the means valuable, pertinent and necessary knowledge was provided to humanity.
Q: Were humans more open to this assistance?
C: Yes, openness without which recovery and advancement would have been more difficult.
Q: An openness relatively missing today, on Earth?
C: Yes, however growing rapidly!
Q: Esteemed Committee, thank you!
Q1. When we talk about Atlantis, it sounds like it was a separate nation situated on an island or on a continent. Is this true or was the Atlantean civilization spread throughout the Earth?
C: The civilization traveled all around the Earth, yet the sovereign nation state claimed a land mass in the Atlantic Ocean as its home territory. Its influence was felt far and wide.
This large island was located just southwest of where one now finds the island of Bermuda; this island did not exist during the time of Atlantis. Its appearance was the result of the disappearance of Atlantis, and appeared above the waves some time later.
The collapse of the hard surface below the ocean incurred several after shocks or settlements of Earth's crust, Bermuda appearing in one of them.
Q2. What was the level of technological and social development in the other parts of the world at the time of Atlantis? Was Atlantis like a technologically dominant country at that time much like the USA is now or was there a huge difference in the level of advancement between Atlantis and the rest of the world?
C: We say, the USA is commercially dominant and this results from general demand for products and services, technology resulting. Technology appears elsewhere, its application significant by commercial application.
Yes, the Atlantis civilization was advanced technologically, however it did not possess nuclear energy, the ability to split a heavy atom.
Yes, Atlantis possessed advantages over other territories on Earth however the gap or differential was not enormous, as business gains were pursued. The technology was sold for profit. World commerce involved barter to a greater extent than now, although it did not predominate. Remember the value of a nation's currency is supported by what that nation might offer, produce and allow to be bought. The population of Earth was not as large, not nearly so, as now in your early 21st century.
We suggest the wealth of nations as sailing vessels dominated the seas, no fueled ships or air travel possible. This time was not so long ago in history and much wealth has developed from trade using these. Atlantis dominated yet technology, its application and demand were not as easily sent around the globe as is common currently.
Q3. When Atlantis was destroyed, what happened to the rest of the world? Were other places affected too, by the cataclysm ?
C: Yes, the massive ocean waves resulting had the expected effect. Her peoples escaped in small numbers, aboard sea vessels. Consider any country today, its available ships and planes and then its population and you can appreciate the tiny fraction that might escape. This w as the case with Atlantis also. There was warning of only a few days in length. The survivors went to what are now Mexico, Egypt and Peru. Ancient structures such as pyramids and others are the result.
Q4. If Atlantis was aggressive militarily, who were their enemies and how advanced were those civilizations/countries? Did their enemies possess powerful militaries and technologies too?
C: We would say adversaries, as vigorous warfare Earth has known in the seventeenth through twentieth centuries did not occur. There were a series of skirmishes as Atlantis born explorers encountered other peoples and nations. Atlantis did not come under attack, but rather sought to subjugate for its benefit. It used military force to do so.
Q5. How long did Atlantis exist (span of time)? When was it destroyed (in which year BC)?
C: No backwards measurement of a time before Christ would we attempt; we shall say Atlantis disappeared approximately six thousand years ago, four thousand before Christ walked upon Earth. It existed for a period of approximately one thousand as a separate nation state, the concept of such sovereign state as it is now understood limited to islands. Across land masses there were not defined borders as known today, although there were separate civilizations dominating specific territories, to be sure.
Atlantis' existence was longer than one thousand years, civilization upon the large island mass covered approximately double that.
Q6. As I am from India, my curiosity is to know what kind of civilization existed in India at the time of Atlantis? Was it a part of the Atlantean civilization or if not, what was their relation with Atlantis and the level of technological and spiritual development ?
C: What is now India was populated certainly yet with fewer people, far fewer. It was a lower level adversary with Atlantis however no regular hostility occurred. We must say, the culture of India today does not resemble India of that time. The two cannot be compared, there is not a continuous development. The people of India closely resemble the physical appearance of many Atlanteans, especially of lighter tone.
Q7. The stories of the Great Flood is told in almost all religious texts. Did this flood happen before the Atlantean civilization came into being or afterwards?
C: Afterwards. Asteroid impacts were a great cause of the floods and eliminated great portions of Earth life, thus a nearly complete reset of Earth civilization, culture and development, seeded by the few survivors.
Q8. Why is the story of Atlantis not found in ancient texts/myths of other civilizations?
C: The people and all records were destroyed. The few who remembered dies, and the stories faded in just a few generations, s has always happened until technological record keeping allowed a study of history.
Q9. Were the physical features of the people of Atlantis similar to modern humans or different ? How did they look like? What was their lifespan?
C: All very similar. Diet was better understood; it is also now, yet the minority follow ideal diets today.
Q10. Did the people of Atlantis travel to space and other planets? Did they have contact with extraterrestrial beings?
C: No space travel was undertaken although studied, yes. There was similar extraterrestrial contact as today, however it was not shrouded in fear, doubt, disbelief and skepticism as is now common. Fascination with visitors from other planets grips many humans in a way few were grasped by the concept in Atlantis.
Q11. Spiritually, how advanced were Atlanteans? Were they aware of the existence of Spiritual World? What was their concept of God and did they have temples of worship?
C: Yes, they were more aware as have been many Earth cultures until the rise of organized religions wrested control of the subject, and we hesitate to lay blame with a religion, as it is but a creation of the people, as are governments.
The people created institutions and through them, stepped away from a set of beliefs and into others, and these today discount the existence of what traditionally was always known to exist in Earth.
Q12. Did all the people of Atlantis die in the cataclysm or maybe some of them escaped? If so, couldn't they carry forward the technologies and knowledge of Atlantis? If some people escaped, where did they go?
C: Yes, some escaped, as mentioned above.
Q13. Currently Atlantis is only a myth. Shall we manage to discover archaeological evidence of Atlantis in the future? Will we be able to recover the true history of Atlantis in the future?
C: Yes and somewhat however fret not at incompleteness, as you shall not know what is missing by that fact and enough shall be learned and understood to provide meaning and understanding. Earth societies and civilizations relearn much of what Atlantis traversed and little of what Atlantis could supply as lessons will be relevant.
Q14. Did Lemurians build Atlantis? Where exactly was Lemuria located and when did this civilization exist?
C: No. Lemuria was in the Pacific Ocean, remnants being the USA state of Hawaii and New Zealand, however these were different and closer together at the time of Lemuria's existence.
"We hope you have enjoyed this information; be well. "
Q: So we can examine Earth history "out of order"?
C: Yes, however the linear sequence will be brought to context where it matters, and the entire set of experiences related will be encapsulated. It is not possible to examine an incident having occurred in a life, ignorant of or isolated from influencing events that preceded or effects that followed. Precedents, causes and outcomes are included.
This we wish to say is the great difference; the timeline of Earth is re-arranged to allow comprehensive views, absent the effect of time.
Q: In linear time, is the history of Earth as humanity understands it accurate?
C: Yes, however incomplete and the details absent can be argued to say human understanding of Earth's history is thus in-accurate. Not untrue, yet prevailing understanding is quite incomplete.
There is no current consequence of this to humanity, despite eager, often intense curiosity. The phases and civilizations of Earth long since passed, in linear time, have no influence and effect and your life purposes are not shortchanged by little information about them.
Q: Given the ability to examine Earth's past, the creation of the planet itself and all development of life upon it, I understand this implies ability to see the future?
C: Yes. The future is a series of alternatives and choices, as is the past.
Q: The past contains choices?
C: Yes, of course. These courses of events such choices might have produced can be seen well, even though the linear course Earth inhabitants choose weaves its way through them. The Earth view is one of a fixed course allowing movement in one direction only. What we say is, history reveals the several courses; each can be reviewed as if it happened, on Earth.
Q: How was Earth created?
C: Earth coalesced from heavier matter, as have many billions of planets in each galaxy.
Q: Talk of dimensions and vibrations is common; do higher vibrations allow perception of all dimensions below and at the corresponding vibration and does this allow all beings of the universe to view Earth?
C: No, there are vibrations upon Earth unable to achieve awareness of the planet; many plants and animals and certainly all inanimate things.
Yes, situation at a certain vibration and corresponding dimensionality allow lesser velocities to be perceived.
Q: Earth history from creation of the planet until now can be seen, reviewed and understood?
C: Of course, and all of you on Earth remember these occurrences.
Q: What future awaits Earth?
C: The result, the outcome of choice.
Q: How can some predictions then be made with regular accuracy?
C: Predictions are no more than recognition of choice, not yet encountered along the linear timeline. The choice is made, its turn in line not yet taken. The prediction of an event is the choice of the participant coming into awareness, no more.
Q: Not all things are predicted or “pre-chosen”, are they?
C: No, they are not. Choice and selection remain paramount and can always be altered. In many cases the importance of the choice to the life purpose is such that no change is allowed, and this great purpose and honor is served and met by one's Guardian Angels and Guides.
Q: Will Earth suffer war, social strife, calamity and disaster?
C: Yes, as it always has.
Q: Unpleasant as thousands dead from a storm are - as happened recently - we accept this as we understand no control can we have. Half this number dead in armed conflict, events we do control, cause a great anger and suffering, despite the similar result; thousands dead. Why do we accept many dead or bitterly reject many dead?
C: Intent and choice recognized and unseen, the manner of life on Earth. The choice to participate in these events is always known before incarnation. Choice of death in war or weather is always available.
Q: We see wars on Earth as such a bad thing, a sure sign of evil among humanity.
C: Bitter anger and vicious rejection of the leaders who cause war is a less recommended reaction, as this perpetuates the phenomena. Forgiveness and acceptance are better; you serve humanity and yourself far better through forgiveness of Adolph Hitler, not condemnation.
Q: That's a huge bite for many of us to chew on, like too big a mouthful, I'd say.
C: Yes, we understand this well and a great opportunity your question identifies. Love your tormentor and forgive your aggressor, seek never revenge or retribution. These deliver strength, force and continuance into the act, supporting power and influence in the transgressor.
Q: Have there been great developments and civilizations on Earth other than Atlantis and Lemuria?
C: Not to similar size and levels of development, no. Earth now reaches the apogee of its third major development of society. The plan for Earth is a transmutation of this now concluding third phase, and its replacement by development. No extinction as occurred with Lemuria and Atlantis is foreseen.
Q: What ended Lemuria?
C: Asteroid impacts.
C: Collapse of the land, earthquake or tremor as you have now named it. Self-inflicted, we say.
Q: Population reduction through attrition is the current plan?
Q: Had the Atlantean civilization not self-destructed, would it have developed into what we have today?
C: No; in technology Atlantis rivaled and surpassed current Earth technologies in many ways. Social development was a problem leading to the eventual undoing of Atlantis. A separate course was available, yet its supporters were shouted down and ostracized. Great lessons Earth supplies to both oppressors and those ostracized and even persecuted for dissent.
Q: Did religious crusades, world wars and regional genocides have to occur? Will there be repeats?
C: No, no foretold requirement was ever imposed. The likelihood of repeats is not high, the option always available. We suggest most humans will not follow such movements as have occurred in the most recent several centuries of Earth time.
Q: Can Earth history since Ancient Egypt be given an academic grade?
C: Yes, Earth earns an "A" yet perfection to the satisfaction of many was not achieved and we offer, it is nearly impossible without great cost and strife. We recommend each unpleasant or negative event informed by likewise accompanied by simultaneous report of a positive happening. This is easily achieved, the habit of doing so to be created without difficulty. Great advance occurs as the proper balance is understood.
Q: One last question, our Honorable Committee, about Earth history; since it can be arranged in the order desired and spread out before us for review and understanding, can we also spread out the future in a similar manner?
C: There is no difference; the concept of future and past are products of linear time. The reality of Earth history is Earth existence. The existence of Earth had a beginning but it is not before now, in the true and actual arrangement of the universe. Also, the future comes not after but is also now. From your place, your spot, your observation point, you may extend out along any line curved or straight or both, and reach to the events of Earth. These options are found before you, behind you, next to you, below and above, in any direction. Distance can be reduced by curvature, what appears close can be placed far, that seen as far away brought closer as you shift your placement.
There is an infinite possible number of events, yet the options available are not, these are not necessary to be infinitely unlimited. The number of souls on Earth is finite and the linear time created by daylight cycles likewise limits options. Within these limits are proposed then agreed many options. Some are followed, many are combined as life on Earth progresses, components assembled to create new options.
In linear terms, a future must follow the past, the now simply being the point chosen to balance the two. On Earth, linear time eliminates the concept of "now", itself universally understood yet simultaneously recognized to be no more than a snippet or segment of past and future.
In Heaven, all is in the "now" and concepts of future and past along a sequence exist only within the environment created to frame such an illusion.
Earth's immediate future, for the lifetimes of adults reading this, a period covering approximately one half of a century, contains interesting developments. None are fixed, all able to be changed and modified by your collective will and choice.
Q: What choices await us over the next five decades?
C: The role and effects of money; the interaction of sovereign nations, the role of governing entities within, interaction of humanity and understanding of Earth’s place in the galaxy and universe.
There awaits the choice to reconfigure notions of physical possessions and the benefits derived from them. We suggest the likely choice will be a reduction resulting from recognition of the limits to contentment such items might supply. The opportunity will rise from a change to the role of money across the globe. Communication through technology will provide the beginnings.
Sovereign nations interact well now, and the disagreements seen are emphasized if lesser in amount and intensity than previously occurring along your linear timelines. The role of information through technology easily paints an appearance otherwise yet we say, sovereign nation interaction is more positive and beneficial in your "now" than throughout the several recent millennia. There are components of each nation which perceive threat and other components within some sovereign nations that perceive opportunity, which itself creates a threat to some. These receive attention and emphasis; give them not so prominent a place, they matter less than squawkers would allow you, could a squawker control your point of view, which they cannot.
Economic turmoil, already underway, is one effect of physical possession shifts in perception and central authorities will come under increasing pressure. This pressing of demands against entities nearly already unable to cope with delivery of wants will cause a reshaping of them, and a lowered emphasis by the composers of the government and its entities and agencies.
Interaction of humanity will lessen as travel across the globe reduces; no automatically beneficial or detrimental effect arises from this; very much there is an individual choice to accept, reject or modify one’s ideas of a seemingly distant culture.
Of great interest to us is the gradual and soon unmistakable rise in presence of your extraterrestrial cousins; reaction and choice to this is very open. Many alternatives are there, many outcomes possible. We suggest your extraterrestrial visitors are excited in a way we attempt not to describe. Human choice before this will be entertaining, enriching and enlightening to observe. We have great faith this will lead to wonderful development on Earth.
Q: Committee, we thank you.
C: You are all welcome.
Q: Our esteemed Committee, and I hope you do not object to this use of words that imply possession, I see all of you as resource for us, why does Earth exist?
C: No objection to this possessive pronoun have we, au contraire as is common to say with English, we enjoy being seen as connected to and as your resource, to all of you reading these words. That is our intent, that is is recognized through your words of choice compliments us.
Earth exists because of God. This idea, that God created the Heavens and Earth, is true.
Q: What is Earth's purpose?
C: Its purpose is to exist as intended, its existence was intended. Desired, willed, hoped for and then accomplished.
Q: What about this theory of the Big Bang? That a massive explosion started the universe, this conclusion on Earth resulting from the movement of stars and galaxies relative to one another, is any of this true?
C: You ask if there was a Big Bang, and we say yes, of sorts, however this event exists across dimensions and the effects, while inter-related, are not the same in each dimension. For some dimensions, the events are only something to observe.
Q: Are astrological movements tracked on Earth accurate?
C: Yes and no. The portions tracked by you are accurate, within the parameters or limits of perception surrounding and creating you dimension. We shall explain.
Distance on Earth is measured objectively with fixed units; feet, kilometers, inches and so forth. Time is of equal importance, as distance has meaning through time. A steady walk of one hour versus the bicycle or the automobile illustrates. As new methods reduce time to traverse distance, the meaning of distance likewise changes. We suggest jet travel's effect on Earth and the interplay of humanity.
The scientific notion that a star is located "x" light years away from Earth assumes the light seen in Earth travels at only the limited speed of three hundred thousand kilometers per second.
This is true from your Earth science view, understanding and limit. Within this limit, it is accurate. Outside of this limit, it is otherwise. We hesitate to say inaccurate, as this human word suggests or implies incorrectness, as would be the solution of a mathematical exercise.
There are other perceptions, other measurements.
If your Earth time were fixed about the universe, it could not exist. Imagine all the development on Earth over the course of just several millennia, then compare to the time light is said to travel from a distant star, two hundred thousand light years away. One millennium is but one percent of the two hundred thousand.
Q: Where you say, "it could not exist" do you mean Earth time or do you mean the universe?
C: Either one. Earth time is your perception on Earth, it is true and it applies. on Earth. As soon as departure from Earth surface environment is achieved, the reality of time - which is very real on Earth - becomes an illusion. The universe cannot exist in an illusion. Likewise, Earth time cannot exist where the conditions of Earth are not present. Rate of rotation, distance from the central star, size of the planet and intensity and color of light all create Earth time. There are very few, by comparison to the total, planets of similar light patterns and parameters. Time on just the neighboring planets of the Earth's solar system is different.
Q: So how does this illusion of time affect our view - the human view - of the history of the Earth?
C: The sequences of events, placed along the segment or line of Earth perception, seem to be a line. Before and after create it. Where the time of Earth exists not, time can see to be bent or curved. This is not how the sequence of events is shaped, it only appears bent when viewed through linearity of Earth. Your calculus explored rates of curvature, sines, cosines and so forth. These approach curvature from a linear viewpoint, and we offer that linearity is required for a view of curvature.
In the reality of the university and in your true, natural and basic energetic essence, curvature does not seem to exist as you perceive on Earth. There is no flatness or linearity, as the surface and the illusion of sequential events create.
Q: Please go back to the light thing, two hundred thousand light years. The speed of light is three hundred thousand kilometers in one second.
C: Yes, inside your parameters.
Q: This means eighteen million in one minute, more than one billion in an hour, almost twenty six billion in one day and nine and a half trillion in one year. Just one year. Two hundred thousand years....that's 1,892,160,000,000,000,000 km. I don't even know the word for a number with more than a dozen zeros. Gazillions? Scazillions?
C: Compression reduces; bends we say. Disassemble the pieces, by dividing any way you choose and then reassembly can be in different shapes. The space inside atoms is vast and can be used. Through this space time is bent. Reduced after disassembly and repacking.
Q: Is this how we review Earth history?
C: Yes, also how your life is reviewed. A life of eighty years lived would have no value if the story required the same perceived elapsed time to review. We suggest human movies, a story of years told in ninety of Earth's minutes. Do you see how on Earth you use the bending of time? This is how your memories work. The recall and evocation of remembrance is the "bending of time" yet we say, time on Earth is the true bending. The display and arrangement of experience is is not bent.
Q: Explain please, the arrangement of experience.
C: From all directions there extend outward from your soul straight lines, reaching an infinite distance. As you can imagine, the number of points in total, along each line increases by logarithm. There is always space, room or ability to accommodate more lines, as each extends farther from you. By whatever pattern you choose place markers along the lines, shall you increase the number of them. Each can represent a specific moment of your lives incarnated.
Your movies, initial motion pictures, replicated this structure. The camera made a series of still images of the event and movement. Upon display of each, at the same pace, the movement seen by the human eye is re-created. We know the many of you have seen the trick with the pad of paper, where a drawing is made upon many sheets. As the paper is quickly shuffled in order, each sheet passes quickly, and achieves a similar effect as a movie. These are suggestions of Heaven, and were recreated on Earth by channeling, unrecognized or not admitted by the apparent inventors.
Continued in Part 2 of 2
A reader asks about this American magician from Brooklyn, New York saying it's not realistic to believe everything Blaine does is sleight of hand or illusion. It's been said Blaine has "Alien" DNA. The Committee offers more information and about his purpose. For the as-of-yet uninformed, Wikipedia will tell about Mr. Blaine.
Q: Members of The Committee, is David Blaine using extraterrestrial DNA to enable the performances of his tricks, stunts, feats of endurance and magic?
C: Yes, however we do say, all humans have alien or extraterrestrial DNA as it is defined. The idea such genetic code is responsible for these feats or tricks, otherwise blocking humans in general from similar acts, is not accurate. This person, named David Blaine, displays abilities all of you have. His molecular structure differs slightly from the normally programmed arrangements in humans, to ease the manifestation of the ability. This does mean these DNA differences are required, not at all. They simply mean Blaine has required less effort and thus less distraction, in furtherance of purpose.
Q: What is that purpose?
C: Provide a visual example. As is yours.
Q: Yours? Who, me? The person typing your messages?
C: Of course, another example you supply, in a different way from Blaine.
Q: Expand if you could, on this example Blaine provides.
C: The tricks he appears to perform allow a better or greater expression of true energy, the energy of your mind. In this we refer to the energy, and thus abilities or powers, all humans have. The biblical stories of Jesus replacing an ear cut off, statements from him that anyone could do this, are another example. Blaine focuses more energy, which allows the apparent tricks he performs. These are not tricks, much as human social habit, custom and understanding creates this way of thinking, this belief. What Blaine does demonstrates true energy, unleashed from the limitations human existence both imposes and seeks to impose.
Q: What does that mean, "seeks to impose"?
C: Human customs have developed to discard, dismiss and at the minimum, de-emphasize that which has been collectively decided as strange, unusual and uncommon.
Q: What happens with him, or through him?
C: Much as a lightning rod provides a conduit, the human body can also focus the energy it seeks to transfer. All actions begin in the brain, the electrical command sent through nerves. The origin is not the brain, it is the receiver antenna, the nervous system its lines and cables of distribution. The true energy is your thought, your mind the tool utilized. Blaine focuses this energy more efficiently, and transmits it to and through the objects he manipulates. Likewise he achieves acts of endurance in the same way, his mental energy blocks the return energy of fatigue; he is able to energize the muscles required in a way not common.
Q: He does this through just thought?
C: Of course, as do all of you. Do not all voluntary acts commence with thought?
Q: So if I just "think" hard enough that I want to make something pass through a table top as Blaine does it, I can? If any of us try, we won't succeed.
C: Beliefs are thoughts, and they are strong. Because you do not believe you are able, you cannot. Until you believe.
Q: So Blaine was born into this life with the purpose to demonstrate abilities?
Q: But so many observers will simply dismiss his tricks as that, and go on with their lives after the entertainment, as they see it, is finished.
C: Some will, most will not. The majority having seen these things, will question how and why; has such questioning not produced the entry you now prepare? How many will read it and how many will wonder, or become more convinced, versus less? So you see, Blaine achieves another piece to his purpose.
Q: Why can't everybody just concentrate really hard and then they'll be able to do the same things?
C: They can; do you wish to alter your life's course? You have provided for your life and lessons, including a questioning of ability, purpose and future. You have already chosen what you shall "know" when you question yourself, and have asked your Guides and Angels to limit you, for your purpose and benefit. You can and may choose otherwise, and be like Blaine. If you alter your life's course, you will lose opportunity already included. Your prefer avoidance of this loss more than a gain in such ability.
Q: So what does Blaine give?
Q: Esteemed Committee, thank you,
C: As always, welcome you all are.
Having asked for a look at Heaven, we ask The Committee to describe how Earth is seen from "Heaven" as we understand that to be.
Q: I guess the first thing to ask is what "Heaven" should mean?
C: We shall say, this human word fits a human concept and it is this definition we attempt to explain. It is your true home, your natural state, the place you occupy. This is your essence, your base and basis and the place of your origin.
Q: Most humans understand it's where we go when we die.
C: You do not die, and thus you go nowhere. You discard your body and disappear from the energy field perception of your human being companions.
Q: My good friend Erik recently described dimensions and vibrations, saying the former exist and latter enable perception.
C: Heaven is all dimensions available and within access.
Q: There are dimensions we cannot visit from Heaven?
C: There are sections within you do not visit, just as there are buildings you do not enter, on Earth. You know of them, see them, understand their function and purpose all without general access. There are places like this in your true home, the difference being that as you know where you may not visit, you do not feel curiosity or intrigue to do so.
Q: OK, so when a being looks upon Earth, what can be seen?
C: We say, it is not what is seen, it is what is understood. From Heaven, a gaze upon Earth gives appreciation foe the thoughts, energy and emotions of all things. The physical appearance is only a small portion. We suggest your photographs; the most beautiful remains flat and never creates the same perception as being where the photograph was taken. The live view adds an appreciation no photo can provide.
When your gaze from Heaven is trained upon Earth, this same appreciation is felt; as your flat photograph comes alive before you, Earth will come alive in a way like this, making your view of it seem as flat as do your photographs.
Q: When you say thoughts, energy and emotions, what about rocks and trees and oceans and.....
C: Interrupt we will, to say all of these things have emotions also, much as you do, yet different and not perceived. We suggest a photograph of a tree being cut, a movie of the felling of the same tree and sight of the live event. Each of these adds to the appreciation, yes? From Heaven you will see the soul, energy and the pain of the tree as its life on Earth is ended this way, the view expanded upward and outward just as the photo into movie into live experience expands the view before it.
Q: Is this why blind people see things so much differently?
C: Yes, the eye organ information is not used and has not the opportunity to confuse the brain, and the perception of energy is allowed to flourish, sight information does not confuse, blur or demote the energy.
Q: Could a photo be taken from Heaven? A still picture?
C: Yes, however colour and nuance and feeling would still be present and perceived.
We suggest a black & white photograph versus a colour motion picture, as an example of the difference you would - and will again - perceive in Heaven, if a still photograph were seen versus true perception.
Q: So do we see a building and also inside it, through it and everything in between?
C: Yes, however the possible overwhelming information a Heavenly view could seem to offer is not this way, in Heaven. There is not time and no deadline upon which understanding is required; what you see in, through, about and also inside the people of the building will come to you separately and together, simultaneously.
This word we like, as it describes time. In Heaven, there is the passage of simultaneousness, as on Earth you perceive the passage of time.
Earth allows a simultaneous, yet separate and also connected view into all things, when looked upon from Heaven.
Q: What about auras and energy fields and things like that around humans? Can those be seen?
C: Yes, automatically and also they can be turned off; what we mean to say is, the natural appearance and perception of such energy colors, which is what appears, can be suspended. This creates a view typical of what many humans will see of Earth.
Q: Why is that done, the ability to see auras turned on or off?
C: The chapters of a book, a collection of stories is a good way to see this from your view. The book is one yet has many parts; each part can be seen and appreciated separately yet a well done book connects the pieces, which are appreciated also apart.
Earth is complete perfection in this way, all parts of all things fit together marvellously well even when the separated components are admired.
So it is a joy for us who look upon Earth this way, and all of you, to see completeness and its parts, the beauty in the brush strokes of the painting so admired. The beauty you create with your lives, the love we feel as we sense the commitment and dedication all of you display as you travel to live on Earth and allow us the pleasure of beholding this beauty you all create, there are no words.
Q: Our Esteemed Committee, thank you and we hope to visit this subject again.
C: Our honour and pleasure; be well, one and all!
This word was recently taught to your humble scribe by a reader, who made reference to it as one of many subjects of interest. Its dictionary definition means to communicate with the dead, which would describe the Departed & Well Known page accurately. That would make me a necromaniac?
Let's ask about this and see what The Committee can tell us.
C: Of course you know, this concept of dead, does not exist.
Q: Just like that, a comment without even asking a question!
C: An example of the absence of time, this is, or was. Or shall be. As this conversation has already taken place, yet you do not know it.
Q: So you anticipated my question?
C: We read it and knew it already, yes, and as humans would say, jumped the gun. For fun.
Q: Are you three in the mood for a poem?
C: Yes, always, yet we shall refrain for now. To not bore the cow, who waits not for chow, who will not say wow, but soon shall say ciao.
Q: Very good, for a brief hit. OK, the idea of communication with the dead, this is a complete Earth idea?
C: Yes, and operates only within the definition of alive, as it's been understood.
Q: Can you give an example?
C: A rock is agreed to be dead, without life. What is life? Organic activity? This is a general understanding. As the organism ceases this activity, what happens? The plant or tree or even simple animal is seen to end, its physical existence to decay biologically. No imprint or effect of its existence is seen to remain.
The rock is seen to not have this at all, thus its death cannot be. Does a rock sometimes display properties of magnetism? Just as a human can be said to have a magnetic personality?
Q: So biological function, or its ending, is not a requirement for life?
C: It is, if the definition of life requires it, as humans do.
Q: We can't kill a rock?
C: Yes you can and no you cannot. You may transfer its soul energy elsewhere and the rock will break down and join a different existence, but this dispersion and reabsorption of its energy field will not occur intact as with a soul, yet the energy will be similar, if less complex on Earth, as it is in humans or animals you deem complex.
Nothing can be killed and no energy destroyed. transfer is what occurs. Movement only.
Q: This is crazy, to suggest rocks have an energy field or soul.
C: By Earth and human agreed definitions, yes. But no, also. There is an essence an existence for all things, beyond the limits of human definition.
Q: This very scientific sounding term for communication with the dead, necromancy, means what to humanity?
C: Simply how humans see, and require to see, the end of the function of an organism. The mode of communication shifts and is seen to disappear. Not necessarily but the change indeed is required, for your life is thus defined.
Q: The quest for eternal life, I'd say.
C: Yes, but there is no quest, life is eternal. You shall all recall it, and it will seem to have arrived too soon. You go not to Earth to gain what you already have; you go to forget what is already yours, and always will be. Through this you learn much.
Q: The fascination, doubt, intrigue and desire to communicate with the dead, is this generally good or not?
C: It is good, yet will remain beyond the reach of the many who expect and hope the conversation with words can be recreated. The limits of life all of you are convinced to represent true limits will smile with joy and glee to see how you have imposed them upon yourselves, when released. In your meantimes, enjoy them.
Q: Committee, thank you.
Many readers have asked that this subject be re-visited, and so we do.
Q: Esteemed Committee, the loss of wealth and the inability to generate it create worry, concern and distress for the many. Uncertainty discomforts us, and knowledge calms us, even the knowledge of pain.
The aspect of unknown is what troubles us. As this relates to work and earnings from it. We worry, as you know.
Q: Just "yes"?
C: Yes; what question have you about this?
Q: Will world economies recover?
C: Economies never recover; as all of you do, they evolve. It is more correct to say, they reflect the evolution of human societies. Economies are just barometers, dipsticks, meters & their readings, of humanity and choices.
Q: So economic improvement is possible with choices?
C: Always, as choices always lead to the place now occupied, as it is examined.
Q: What choices can be made to return to prosperity?
C: All of you are already prosperous, we suggest you desire a return to relatively higher, better, more confidence inspiring economic trends. To this we say, simply choose this route. The course of your lives, collectively, brought all of you along the economic path as it has lead to your current place. This is fixed, immutable and will always be.
Q: Yes, however loss of wealth and ability to earn, how do we restore it?
C: We shall say, examine choices leading to your place. Which entities - groups of people we mean by this - chose to lend money? How much loss will these groups accept? The amounts of debt against the amounts of your money are examined by a lender? Does the lender examine only the borrower or the borrower's environment, which is the lender's environment? At what point shall borrowings become excessive? This choice remains to be made; we suggest a framing of the issue with unlikely extremes. Your economic analysis involves this view often; assume tomorrow all borrowers stop returning monies to lenders. What will happen? This can be examined and forecast. Let's push towards the extreme in the opposite; all borrowers begin to make overdue amounts current or reduce and even eliminate borrowings as much as possible. This leads to far lower debts, in either case. Do you appreciate what we say, lower debts, one way deemed negative and the other positive.
Separate the label of negative or positive from the outcome and examine solely the absence or lowering of debt to very small levels. As this level of economic lubrication falls away, so shall fall away income to lenders and less lenders shall there be. If there are less lenders, then naturally there will be far fewer borrowers, and shall this increase or decrease production?
Q: Decrease, I say.
C: Yes, likely this is, and either way, this will lead to lower wealth as humans see wealth. The choices fall inside these extremes, and we say emotions and reactions caused by the emotions will create a collective choice. Your beliefs, that a debt owed has become impossible to collect, shall create conditions. This need not be the case, as you can simply print more money to replace what is not collected.
Q: That makes no sense.
C: Because you choose to say it makes no sense, yet money is created and extinguished regularly. What was borrowed was given in hopes of a return sufficient to repay and also gain. If the gain is not being returned, create more of the coupons, the vouchers of trade, the coupons of wealth you call money.
Q: This will erode and soon destroy the value.
C: If you choose to see this. Yes. The belief is your choice. Do you care about the money spent elsewhere if you have sufficient amounts to do as you select? Likely not, and this belief is your choice. You may choose to ignore others' economic behaviour or change your behaviour by it. As you choose.
Q: None of us see how we can control conditions this way.
C: Collectively you do. This collective effect is from a collective choice.
Q: Most people are unaware of this, the way central banks, monetary authorities and the like operate.
C: A human choice, always reversible. Allow us a suggestion; how much debt of governments is held as collectible by the same governments' central bank? Large amounts, we do say. We suggest these governments erase the debt, eliminating both sides of the transaction from the central treasury and central bank. Leaders with this control are elected; elect others.
Q: Will this restore confidence?
C: If collective understanding is broad enough so that economic behaviour is altered, yes, however this choice must also be made and followed.
Q: I don't see this happening.
C: It is unlikely, as it would be seen as abrupt, excessively so. Central banks and monetary authorities would resist the abruptness, preferring slow and steady changes. Will the political controllers agree? You choose the political controllers.
Q: In the case of an economic shift, where prices would rise far faster than incomes to match, what would happen?
C: The higher prices would soon produce higher incomes; the profits the increased prices create will do what? So the owners of the businesses will, save, invest or spend and in all three cases, the money flowing to producers will flow through and re-level the economy, as a tsunami will see the disturbed waters returned to level after much movement.
Q: And damage.
C: Yes, economic turmoil is likely as a levelling occurs. Turmoil is your choice to see.
Q: This is so troubling to imagine, sky-rocketing prices causing many people to become hungry.
C: It is not necessary. Give food to the hungry.
Q: Producers of the food will not work for free.
C: If all money were eliminated tomorrow, would humanity create a new currency immediately or simply choose to have no currency, no medium of exchange? By habit we say a new currency and barter would flourish nearly instantly. This is a choice. You control the choice. Who tells you what to do with earnings?
Q: Taxes we must pay.
C: No, you can choose leaders inside current systems and remove this, or remove the system and create a new one, prohibiting tax. Your choice.
Q: We cannot just take food without paying.
C: We suggest it not, yet if all of you did, you would not have to pay. The seller would stop selling, this is a true, short term effect but would the majority starve or would a new system of production, distribution and consumption quickly rise? By your choices.
Q: Has humanity already chosen its economic course but we who live inside the linear sequence must wait to see?
C: Yes, however you can change the choice. The choice has been made means not that the choice is fixed. Only where time distorts reality does a choice made equal finality. Yes, the choice has been made, but a new choice can replace it.
Q: What other choices are available, what other courses of action have we chosen to follow?
C: There is a parallel path of economic behaviour far different for Earth and if followed, many would consider it boring, unworthy of pursuit. Seen and contrasted with humanity's choices leading to current circumstances, it would seem attractive. If lived, it would seem not.
How many drops of water are in the ocean, how many shall you utilize? The number of drops can represent the units of currency you might create; essentially infinite for your purposes of life on Earth. As the water supply is abundant to the extent of unlimited, simply its transport is seen as the obstacle.
So is this case of money; you may print and electronically create the amounts you desire, to infinity. Unlike water as used by your physical organisms, your money is worth solely your belief. You teach one another how to value it and take satisfaction in the accumulation of what you choose to be sufficient amounts.
We say, far lesser amounts than exist will serve the very purposes you have for money, yet larger amounts also. The amounts are not what matter, the flow of them, the amounts and the dates of the flow, these are what you create then perceive as having value.
Choose different flows and amounts, if you prefer.
Q: It seems so simple, yet it never is.
C: Have we stated a thing you see as not true?
Q: No, not at all. It seems so logical, but....
C: But others' beliefs and expectations make yours challenging, this is what you wish to say.
C: Participate in the monetary system as little as possible, then.
Q: That would close off so many opportunities, if that happened. Living like a hermit recluse in a cabin off who knows where.
C: So rich and challenging is this life you have created on Earth, is it not? So much you learn as you struggle through the choices of your beliefs. We love you and admire you all for assuming this challenge. Yes, it is frustrating however so large grow your souls, in the process of your life of beliefs on Earth.