A reader clues us in to this latest development: (click on the button below)
For anyone unaware: Senator Reid represented Nevada for three decades, serving as Majority Leader for eight of those thirty years (2007-15), making him one of the two most powerful lawmakers in the USA. Before his long Senate tenure, he was a member of the House of Representatives, Lt. Governor of Nevada and head of the state's Gaming Commission (gambling regulator). Senator Reid is reported to have undergone surgery and treatment for pancreatic cancer last year; could this have an influence on what he is now saying? As of February this year, the condition has been reported in remission.
In other words, 6 (six) of 6 (six).
A reader likes these oldies, so the archives got raided. This tiny meadow strikes me as a much more ideal way to re-enter than gates of pearl or bright lights in dark tunnels. For the un-schooled in St. Peter's work station ideology, no worries.
Previous comments made here about our satellite refer; the moon contains artificial ferrous inserts which keep the same side facing Earth, maintaining alignment and a stable orbit. The moon has almost no magnetism; Earth on the other hand, is a massive, powerful magnet.
The effect of Magnet Earth on Moon Iron keeps Earth's orbit about the sun more stable (oscillation) and our climate is therefore more predictable thus habitable, across far larger portions of land surface. Plus, we have a lot of fun with lunar eclipses and get to howl at it once a month.
Of course there is no proof, making me a fraud, a kook or just crazy. All three?
Have a look at this bit of nutcase, idiotic evidence:
A reader asks, "What does The Committee think about tourism?"
C: Tourism a human choice like any other, fed by a natural, innate desire to explore (observing crawling babies & toddlers explains that) exploited for gain by developing inborn human curiosity into a preference for thrills and entertainment, an easy mentality to cultivate. Tourism feeds both the explorer urge and the developed entertainment habit.
Analysis of effects of tourism on the environment can be extended to the existence of roads, buildings, houses and virtually anything humans build and produce. Humans make collective decisions to "destroy" the environment for a new hospital or airport (deemed essential and good, respectively) or the top of Mt. Everest (deemed bad) based on collective choice about the "benefits" or "negative" effects.
Killing chickens or cattle for food is considered okay because humans create the chickens and cows, because of the need to eat, but inadvertently killing sea life with discarded plastics is bad even though humans benefit from plastics, as the collective choice is made to produce the material then products from it.
Ooooops...the faucet and it's called "3D" now, isn't it? With any luck, a few YouTube video skeptics might come here to see a few very recent droplets of evidence in the ocean they don't know, therefore deny, exists.
I met Nick Pope at the UFO Conference in April 2019, however we only talked about wildlife close to our houses.
Speaking of same, the other day I saw a LARGE owl going after a squirrel at about 10:30 AM, the squirrel sprinting across and the owl flying over a road 300m from the house, with moving traffic! An owl not hunting in the dark? Wow.... and the very lucky squirrel got away. The owl looked magnificent, its wingspread was amazing.
Back to the video; drip, drip, drip.....
Of possible interest to the greater, remaining shrunken readership here.
Q1: When I told an inquirer to formulate channeling questions with care, because thought energy invested in making the questions "authorizes" and brings forward the information sought, the inquirer then replied: "I tried to think of questions to ask under the given circumstance but when I try to formulate it, I already know the answer to it so I just end up not having a yes or no question."
Response from The Committee: You already "know" the answer because you have received that information telepathically however you believe it originated as your own thoughts. This leads to the answer to your question #2 ....
Q2: How does anybody know if s/he is communicating with a spirit and not their "own voice"? How can anybody tell the difference between higher self and guides and/or ET's?
C: The questions you say you tried to formulate; from where did your doubt, uncertainty, concern or simple curiosity to know, come? This part of the process originated within you; however when you tried to formulate the question - put your thoughts into words - you discovered you already knew. It seemed like you were looking up an answer in a reference book you briefly forgot you had, or didn't remember right away you have that general information. When directed to the book - in other words, when told to "formulate your questions carefully" - what happened? You realized you know the answer.
Maybe and not quite....maybe the answers were telepathically channeled BUT you perceived such incoming information to be that "you already knew."
You now see why you should formulate questions with care, because thought energy invested, authorizes the release of the information you seek and brings it to you.
Practice it; differences between your own thoughts and incoming information will gradually emerge and become more obvious.
(Sidebar comment: The Committee is ADAMANT about that buzzword, "higher self" - as common & popular as clouds & drinking water - which is blatantly incorrect. We have no higher self, there is nothing about us higher than we already are. We are not lower than ourselves, thus we have no higher self. We are ourselves. We are always complete and we are not segmented into hierarchies inside our existence. Many people beginning a spiritual journey get badly sidetracked with this erroneous notion and never recover.)
Q3: What are the ET races in the area where I live?
All of them, including the humans of which you are one, plus all others who also live there.
Seriously, alien extraterrestrial visitors are not attached to any one location on Earth; they are rapidly mobile. Your region receives frequent visits and is under almost constant observation.
Q4: What's a good book you've published that I should read if I am curious about manifesting financial freedom?
None, neither that I've published nor has anyone else. The easiest way to obtain financial freedom is not participate in the money system. Have none, give none, accept none.
How would such approach affect life and personal interactions? (Given how animals, plants, nature and so forth do not participate in the human money scheme.)
The next step is to examine money for what it is; oil. Grease. A lubricant. It cannot be eaten, swallowed or used very well for any specific purpose without another human involved in the process. Thus the word "capital" (or head; "per person" or per capita).
Money has value as a coupon or voucher; it is received solely because a recipient believes it will be accepted by someone else, as part of the large agreement.
Does a person who wants financial freedom just want lubricating grease & oil or the machinery? Which machines? For what purposes and reasons? Will such machines run better with the more or new lubrication? Many people will refuse to perform a service - i.e. they will not run their machine - no matter how much money is offered, yet others will gladly do that for legal or illegal things.
What are the limits to what money might motivate others to do, which equals your financial freedom?
You really want assurances of enough vouchers & coupons to give others, to provide you with the things - goods and services - you want now and into the future, and promises from others to eventually accept your vouchers when you choose.
Simply focus on what you want and the time you want them. Ferrari next week, huge retirement account tax free next year, gold diamond studded watch next month, fancy dinner tonight, friend's child cured of cancer as soon as possible, and so forth.
Money has limits beyond just being grease. You will realize again what you already know, many very valuable things money cannot buy.
Focus not on financial freedom but specific things you want. The energy money represents will flow where it needs to go, for you.
As the viewer comments for the UFO HUB interview I gave demonstrate, calls & demands for "evidence" are unending and frustrating as heck. The below news organization is a gaggle of hacks? (Well, to some people it is, but precisely because it isn't a ship of fools and is taken seriously.) What is widely covered cannot be evidence at all? I should title every post with mounting information, such as this recent article, "Drip, Drip, Drip", DDD or just 3D. Ha ha, three dimensional?
"Gubmint" forces let leak a few bits.....
Notice how the article contains the following qualifier: " — parts of it remain classified — " without saying:
Thus the title of this post.
Hypersonic generally means faster than Mach 5 (five times the speed of sound) or more than 5,700 kph / 3,500 mph. An American SR-71 Blackbird spy plane once crossed the USA from Pacific to Atlantic on a flying start, covering the distance in 63 minutes. This means average speeds approaching 2,500mph / 3,900kph.
For comparison, the bullet from a big game hunting rifle (e.g. grizzly bear or moose) reaches about 2,000 mph / 3,200 kph as it leaves the gun.
It isn't publicly known if the USA or another country still has aircraft capable of 4,000 kph, because the functions the SR-71 once performed are now achieved with satellites. I'll assume aircraft that fast are still around under tight wraps and good disguises.
Nevertheless, the lid isn't as tightly screwed onto the UFO jar as before.
Mr Merrick's grave has been identified.
A few miles back (the last half a decade has been a good, long stroll) I communicated with Mr. Merrick's soul by reader request; here is that session once again. I thought it would be interesting to re-visit after this recent news.
This news is about a week or two old - the public revelation of a US Navy UFO reporting procedure for aircraft crews - but hasn't died down yet.
Thanks to a long time reader for alerting me! You knows who you is, doan choo be tryin' to hide, ya hear?
UPDATE: as promised 2 days ago (on FryDee [Friday in proper English] March 15th) here is The Committee's update and explanation of the article:
Explains The Committee:
Mentioned in the article is the speed of light, specifically laser beams and photons of light.
Not mentioned: the speed to traverse great distances, by human Earth standards and perception of them, requires velocities vastly superior to 300,000 km/s. Incremental increases of such speeds, brought about through the use of planetary gravity, approach and slingshot style departures, do not achieve the required movement.
This method or technique is viable for use at far lower velocity than is used to cross significant segments of galaxial distances; within a system of planets, when navigating from one to another, this method can be useful.
Planets and their gravity are not used by interstellar travelers; this is achieved, as we have explained previously, with magnetism, magnetic fields and differences, much the way magnetic poles either repel or attract one another.
Joke time: (no Committee, just levity and because I feel like it)
When reading the article below (click on the button) don't analyse it too deeply (British newspaper thus spelling) Remind yourself what's been said here often; time does not exist.
It's an illusion - if very real - for all living things on Earth, who & which must live inside and have cycles of day & night.
Sometimes readers inspire and/or write the posts. A loyal longtime visitor here sent me a simple, powerful "hello" - asking me how I am - which inspired beyond inspiration. Another unwitting reader followed through on the plan everybody's GAGs arranged & coordinated, without anyone but me realizing it, until done. I thought y'all would enjoy the anonymous to & fro which came out of it.
R = Reader P = Patrick (a.k.a Yours Truly)
R: These new images of Ultima Thule – obtained by the telephoto Long-Range Reconnaissance Imager just 6½ minutes before New Horizons' closest approach to the object (officially named 2014 MU69) at 12:33 a.m. EST on Jan. 1 – offer a resolution of about 110 feet (33 meters) per pixel.
Their combination of high spatial resolution and a favorable viewing angle gives the team an unprecedented opportunity to investigate the surface, as well as the origin and evolution, of Ultima Thule – thought to be the most primitive object ever encountered by a spacecraft.
P: Isn't there a line or brand of make-up called Ultima? [I have since learned it is or was ULTA] To my warped interpretation, it resembles an infant of a species similar to a koala bear, arms/paws folded over the chest as it is looking up, with the deep "eye sockets". Primitive = old?
R: I wonder what it says about us as individuals that you see a baby Koala bear and I see pancakes. If you look at the Wikipedia page and scroll down and look right, you can see it rotate.
P: Pancakes? Dumplings!
R: I wonder what it is made of. They think it was two objects that fused together.
P: The Committee says a lot of iron, one struck the other with enough force so the collision attached them, the rotation is the effect from that collision and is maintained by magnetism and gravity.
R: I'd love to hear what a collision like that sounded like. Probably deafening.
P: It was silent, there's no air.
R: As you can tell, I'm not a scientist.
P: I always enjoy Star Trek episodes where several impossible things are shown:
R: Why can't we see stars in space?
P: We can see stars in space until our velocity exceeds the "accepted" speed of light.
If we're moving faster than light we're able to see, it doesn't keep up. The light already in motion is blurred and mixed together, because the colors (caused by frequency variation, just like radio signals) disappear.
Example: tune a radio away from the frequency of a signal, and the station goes silent. A radio unable to match available frequencies receives nothing. Remember AM only radios? The FM band is invisible to them, just as are shortwave bands.
Think of fast moving objects you can see if they move slowly enough or remain still such as shotgun pellets before loading into a shell versus exiting the muzzle when the gun is fired. Not enough reflected light reaches the retina for enough time for the pellets to be detected.
It's why you don't see your GAGs on Earth unless they intentionally slow down into our range.
When traveling above the speed of light, our human traits & abilities remain. We run into light which approaches but faster than 300,000 km/sec, likewise we run away from light behind us.
The approaching light is above our frequency range, lateral rays of light are briefly picked up for a few billionths of a second but their frequencies (thus color) are undetectable thus disappear; everything turns gray TO HUMANS.
It's the cumulative effect of omnipresent light photons passed, mixed with other things we begin to see such as gamma, ultraviolet, infrared and x-rays.
So says The Committee.
R: So if we stop and hover in space, we can see the stars.
GAGs - at least one of my GAGs had the decency to appear as a beautiful human. After you confirmed it was one of my GAGs I saw when my grandmother died, I told him . . . "Nice costume!" I hope he laughed.
P: Yes, no stopping required; just drop velocity below 300,000 km/sec. Every human is a costume.
R: Where can I find a good tailor?
P: In the mirror. S/He's tailored every outfit, suit, get-up and ensemble you've ever or will be & wear.
R: Have you ever thought about whether you've done something horrible in one of your lives? Thank Goodness we don't usually get to know about that while we are in this life.
P: Yes I have and I've also asked The Committee about that. Their answer: the effects of what was done and that life, both ended simultaneously. The benefits of the experience however, every soul keeps forever.
R: I wonder how much access we have to the lessons learned in previous lives while we are in this life. How does that even work?
Do some people come in with more morality than others because of what they learned previously? Or do we choose to block out some of what we learned when it suits the life plan?
I feel as if I might have had a life were I treated others horribly, but I don't want to know about it.
I also feel as if I had a life were I was fairly rich.
P: It depends on the definition of "access" each of us prefers. We set before & follow after birth, the definition(s) we design.
Morality is extremely relative. Yes, some of us choose less, some choose more in relation to the moral standards of the environment expected.
Yes, many of us block memories of many things, which might/could/would distract us materially.
Do you want to know about the wealthy life but not the bad act one?
That's incarnation in 2 easy steps!
R: I just think one could get really mired down with the knowledge of past horribleness, and it would negatively affect their current life.
There is enough to contend with as it is, without bringing more negativity in.
As far as a wealthy life . . . no I don't need to know about it right now. It's just a feeling I've had that I had a life like that. Don't know if I used it for good or bad.
P: It is just "negativity"; almost ANY "past" life issue would be so out of context as to become a problem.
This includes "future" lives also, because as we all know, there are no future or past lives until we've both incarnated then grow old enough to learn the human illusion of time on Earth.
The long time hero of this website - Denis G. of a small, quaint town +/- 100 km northwest of Montréal, Québec - has compiled Notes & Quotes for the last 3 years (2016, '17 & '18) and also the last 6 months' worth, the latter half of 2018.
Comme toujours, merci beaucoup Denis. Je vous dois une dette qui ne pourra jamais être remboursée.
Enjoy them, please.
So long for now folks; until our paths cross again.