To introduce this topic, I refer to a recently posted video by Kevin Moore, of The Moore Show; link to the video just below. As many of you might remember, Mr. Moore interviewed me and included that on his channel, about 2 months ago (almost 11.4 thousand views so far).
In the below video, Kevin interviews Phil Corso, Jr. the now retired son former US Army officer Col. Phillip J. Corso who oversaw the reverse engineering efforts of devices and technologies recovered from crashed alien ET ships. In this 1 hour and 20 minute video (a bit long, like asking you to watch a movie) both inter- viewer & viewee cover a lot of ground BUT ..... the discussion of time really grabbed my attention. You can fast forward to 15:10 and listen until about 21:00 to get the idea. (The entire video pays handsome dividends for "time" invested.)
The Committee expands by answering my questions below.
Reader Linda posted in the last entry's comments, the link to this YooToob video. Repeated here in case it gets lost in the comments. This was a 3 for 1, three firsts:
Not really; Mr. Armstrong doesn't appear. Q&A with The Committee, based on the last session.
This might be the first time I've done this, I don't remember for certain. A longtime and loyal reader sent me a link to watch a Q&A session with the soul of astronaut Neil Armstrong, the first human to set foot on the moon.
The reader has a half dozen questions and asks me what I think of the session. Before I watch the video, I ask The Committee. Here are the reader Q's:
& A's from The Committee:
"Many technologies, methods and procedures of scientific and technical application were developed by humans from clues extracted from the equipment found in the wreckage. These are not limited to lunar travel, but in this specific case, what helped enable the ability to reach and return from the moon was navigation of the vessel. Specifically how to aim the capsule and what launch velocities would be required to reach the moon accurately, breaking Earth's orbit but not overshooting the target.
"No energy source dries up, it is not used and for several reasons. The reasons the energy source, or shall we method, is no longer used is fear. It can be expanded greatly for use & application on Earth in many ways, and such applications would threaten the financial gain of established interests, by lowering costs. There would be required investment for development for larger and wider scale applications than what can be used aboard a space capsule, and additional lunar trips would draw attention towards, not away from this topic. This is one of several factors which have fed into the decision to pursue no more lunar voyages. The pretext, which is valid to a degree thus lending credibility to the decision, is financial. How much more investment can be made in such trips without incurring political risk for profligate outlay of taxpayer funds. It would be questioned what benefit, advantage or gain beyond knowledge of moon rocks is extracted from additional trips to a dead sphere.
"Alien ETs watch many activities of humans, openly disclosing their presence as this is done, however more often remaining concealed, cloaked or hidden from view. The decision to expose themselves to astronauts was intentional; to make everyone involved aware they were and are never unaccompanied while traveling into space.
"Alien ETs simply informed the astronauts and NASA that more and more trips to the moon would greatly increase the probability alien extraterrestrial vessels would be seen on camera, often enough and in sufficient ways that covering up the occurrence would become very difficult without raising skeptical suspicions among human observers. The desire to avoid being forced to explain things that cannot withstand general public scrutiny is one of the several factors which have contributed to the decision to not pursue additional moon visits.
"Tuning into a frequency is the preferred method of travel everywhere, and can be used on Earth also. Every object emits a resonant specific frequency, not simply a common resonance the materials might also possess. The resonant frequency of a certain grade of iron is one ingredient, just as the size and shape of the object also figure into the identifier. Musical instruments are an example; the material, shape and size of air columns and blocks inside the instrument. A trumpet made of steel might sound to the human ear similar if not identical to a brass one, if all other dimensions are identical between the two, however the brass itself will vibrate at a distinct frequency from the steel. This variation, however small, remains a distinct difference which can be easily detected and measured if it is acknowledged to exist, is actively sought and intended measured. As the alien ET vessel traverses vast distances, its course is continually adjusted by referring to the source of the destination object resonant frequency, as unique as a finger print or DNA sample.
"Time travel is a function of velocity, different from navigation as just explained. Time exists on Earth by virtue of light and starlight angle change on the planet's surface. Moving in excess of the perceived speed limit allows time to be reversed to a prior moment.
"We mention propulsion and speed now, not just maneuverability. In addition to identification of a distant target destination, the travelling vessel must cross the distance in a span or lapse of the traveler's sense of time which benefits the purpose, their survival and general benefit of doing so. This is achieved by use of several forces, including gravimagnetism or magnetigravity, both approximately accurate humans words we attempt to coin. The attraction and repulsion of origin and destination by use of this force, are what allow a vessel to move at velocities which far exceeds the speed of light humans perceive and believe to be a maximum achieveable.
"We suggest a missile able to be steered as a car can be directed, as an approximate facsimile of Earth effects compared to what the alien ET ships do, to cross vast expanses of the galaxy. Propulsion against physical resistance is not a factor, and does not involve what must be overcome.
"This same effect and manner of propulsion are what enable visitors to your planet to enter your atmosphere with small scout ships and cross distances of thousand of miles or kilometers in matters of seconds, then stop and hover anywhere chosen, without fuel, heat or turbulence detectable from such travel or extremely rapid movements.
Here is a brief biography of Mr. Armstrong:
Neil Alden Armstrong (1930 – 2012) was an American astronaut, Navy officer and combat pilot, test pilot and aeronautical engineer, who became the first human to walk on the moon (which I watched live on television at the age of 9) later becoming a university professor. When he stepped onto the lunar surface on July 21, 1969, he said: "That's one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind."
Here is the link to the interview session:
Commenting capability briefly returned but fled the premises again. A feeble attempt to make up for it:
Mass Killers & Society
Denis: The Santa Fee student killer has an inferior complex brought on by his upbringing/life plan or both, he cannot handle rejection, the girl was his ticket to freedom from a feeling of inferiority, rejection only reinforces the feeling, he cannot repeat the action, it could bring back the same feeling of inadequacy. He has to look within himself for the answer, forget about relying on somebody else for is way out. Hopefully in prison he will look inside for help.
Excellent perspective Denis. Since he will die in prison, does it matter to him specifically? It's a real struggle to find hope and forgiveness for a seventeen year old who tried to murder two dozen people and succeeded with ten. Imagine the wounded and what the remainder of their lives could be. - Patrick
Alex: Here are 2 facts -
#1 There is a mass shooting in the US almost every day
#2 There is around 1 firearm for everyone in the US
After Scotland had a mass shooting in 1987, London instituted strict gun control laws. So did Oz after a 1996 shooting. But the US has repeatedly faced the same calculus and determined that relatively unregulated gun ownership is worth the cost to society. That choice, more than any statistic or regulation, is what most sets the US apart.
What makes me sad is that gun control debate in the US seems to be over, the consensus being that all these killings, be they in a school, theatre or anywhere else, are bearable in the name of freedom.
I can honestly say, with no offence intended to my American friends here, that I never would wish to live in the US. There are some culturally bridges that can't be crossed. I'm not aware that Jesus or Buddha went about their business armed with anything but a heart full of unconditional love.
There are a LOT more facts involved in this not simple subject, these two are not correct. There are more than one firearm per person (+ a lot of ammunition) and there is not anywhere close to a mass shooting per day or every two days. Mexico is far closer to this than the USA. Mexico is more disarmed than the UK, by the way.
Is it logical to believe the mass murderer would not have acted out violently if no firearms were available? Does violence committed with knives in the UK mean cutting up food is now to be prohibited?
Since you don't sound like you're moving to the USA, moot point. My advice, stay the heck away from Mexico if the USA frightens you. It's fashionable to be critical of the USA, the press invests great efforts to this end and appears to have achieved some success in your case.
Personal suggestion; do not qualify opinions with a desire to not offend anyone's sensibilities If you hold an opinion honestly, state it. Listen to a point-of-view which might refute your impressions. It is not dangerous to be in the USA.
The firearms debate in the USA was begun by the late King George III and has raged ever since. The tradition, custom, practice & RIGHT of & to firearms ownership in the USA was created by England. The reasons firearms became a right - not a privilege, option or favour handed down by royal or executive authority - but rather a right for all law abiding adult citizens, is well explained by British history and exercise of royal authority in the colonies.
We Americans both chose and rejected many things from British tradition. We kept democratically elected representatives, separation of judicial, legislative and executive functions, transparent courts of law, grand juries, trials before juries of peers and the proper role of military forces. We rejected colonialism and territorial possession, royalty, titles of nobility, social privileges and inherited authority. We still reject disarmed subjugation and believe in self protection rights. We specifically encourage religious liberty, the right to public protest to & against elected officials for redress of grievances, public assembly for any reason we want (not reasons an elected official decides s/he prefers) and freedom of speech and press for all. Our ability to defend these rights through & by our right to defend ourselves collectively and individually, are what secure these liberties. The United Kingdom has sadly, tragically and in my humble observer's opinion, casually thrown away these essential components of a modern society, distracting the UK populace with tales of woe about pervasive American gun violence, both irrelevant and untrue.
The United Kingdom has gone down a different and horrifying path recently, namely using police power and courts to oppress protest, opposing opinion and free exercise of the press. Is this going to lead anywhere positive? UK courts can and do muzzle the press, and frankly that is Third World behaviour at its worst. The disarmed status of the British population is a key ingredient in this decay into politically correct oppression.
Great comment Alex. - Patrick
Santanu: What exactly was the motive for the aliens in doing this?
After all, the military prepares a classified report and sweeps everything under the carpet. The reports are declassified selectively years after the incidence when the matter loses much of its relevance.
I think if an alien craft moved along a passenger plane giving ample opportunities to the passengers to take photos, that would have had a more significant effect towards disclosure.
The motive is to show off. Effectively this suggests alien ETs should pick & choose to which groups of humans they disclose themselves. I see nearly zero effect or benefit of showing the maneuverability of their craft to anyone other than a military aircraft. You're right and….would half the passengers aboard the plane freak out? As a once famous politician in the USA said, "You betcha".
Alex: I've read some of the works of Richard Dolan and Timothy Good who have done a lot to expose the alien cover ups on both sides of the pond. They read like some cross between Franz Kafka and an airport whodunit. Human duplicity and the desire for control are nothing new. If we want to take our place amongst the Pleidians, Arcturians et al, we're going to have to complete our inner journey first and find peace.
We have our place now, you mean when we'll become like them socially and interact? Many of us have become like the visiting alien ETs, but not everyone. We humans pay very close attention to the aberrant minority, and largely ignore the successful and massive majority. - Patrick
Patrick, elsewhere you said you keep excellent health. Long may that continue but I have a question for you. Kryon tells us that we can directly converse with our body's cellular structure and transmit an intent to maintain good health or to heal whatever ailments we might have. This intent apparently is very powerful and effective. So I was wondering if you similarly interact with your cells to maintain your own health and wellbeing. I've been doing this and do keep good health. I'm not sure if Kryon's advice holds water but maybe TC could shed light?
"Yes" says The Committee, "however human good health is not only created by a mental desire to have it. The practical effects of diet, sleep, exercise and lifestyles also have effects, as many humans already know and understand." - Patrick
Since Comments and replies are popular but temporarily out-of-order, here are a few which came through the Contact page.
Cooper: Can The Committee describe the most probable effects on human life and systems from the explosions to come? Has that event already occurred on another timeline, what were the effects?
These have been described in detail, sometimes voluminous detail, in the archives or e-books, as effects from and related to The Shift. - Patrick
Susan: Also energies that share the same vibration or interests kind of hang together in spirit i.e. like attracts like.. (so I suppose that is what in humanity you could call a group)
If the word soul is not really appropriate what word would be better? Spark/energies When a Soul/energy first EVER incarnates they must incarnate with other souls/sparks together?? so I suppsose that's what most people say is a soul grouping?
Great question, human words are appropriate or otherwise, if the general understanding reflects the reality. Example; it is common to hear the term "undocumented immigrant" in the USA. This means a citizen from one country who has entered to live in another, one where s/he is not a citizen and has lost or misplaced documents to that effect. "Undocumented immigrant" in practice is typically applied to an intruder intentionally violating the immigration rules of the host nation. There already exists an accurate term in English for this, and it is not "undocumented immigrant".
Soul is appropriate for humans, because it refers to the portion of our existence not our physical body. Once physical bodies are no more, do we need the term such as "soul"? Does our existence require a label? I don't think so…
"Yes", says The Committee, "incarnations cannot and are not undertaken as solo efforts, except in a very few, rare and unique cases. The interactions of humans are key to the process. Consider human birth and reproduction, neither occurring without two or three humans involved, at least." - Patrick
Scott2: Hi Patrick I have tried posting comments a few times and no luck
Solution coming! I hope…. - Patrick
Lovely: Dear Patrick, I wish you continued good health.
Yes, I had difficulties with the website not accepting post yesterday (Friday ). I thank you for pointing out an IT blip posting emails. More than that, I thank you for your website with unique & valued insights & for the sum of all it does.
I like your style also.
Thank you times four. Especially for the first item, it continues good. I'm on the cusp of 58 years and have never been hospitalized, undergone treatment, therapy or taken medications (except temporarily from minor, self-inflicted sports injuries.) - Patrick
Denis: Did you check if your browser accept cookies?
On decisions not possible to be predicted: in heaven you see all the result of the choices that can be made (billions) only one will be taken (which one). Your brain is not able to internalize all the possibilities, you have free will, you choose, in heaven you witness the choice and see all the possibltities.
On time: I agree with the reader, the explanation is accurate a little, the full explanation can not be understood by our limited brain so TC chooses inaccuracy as needed.
My reward on this post:
words are "As inaccurate as they need be" so "The subsurface volcanic infrastructure, to use a human word somewhat accurate" ;D ;D ;D ;D:
I checked the cookie acceptance configuration, and that's not it. The reason the "cookie notice" appears on the bottom of the website is because I enabled that feature as I was checking the comments default settings, to see if that was the issue, problem or solution. It also occurred to me I could have been hacked, but doubted that. Hackers are like burglars; do they take just one small thing from the living room table OR do they toss the entire house?
Excellent explanation of time perception, Denis. - Patrick