Some Alien and UFO footage for you all to enjoy.
Lol...thanks for the entertainment, Susan...).
@ Scott My pleasure ;-)
I love those questions asked of the Committee.... One of my spirit team said last week to me when I was also asking...do they feel what we feel and one replied "You get me feeling" Here are some cute songs my guides gave me today.... I have a feeling Erik was around and I'm pretty sure he likes the song "Party All the Time" by Eddie Murphy as that song keeps coming up when I have the 80's playlist on Spotify shuffle. Anyway enjoy these songs my team gave me :-) :-) :-)
Hi fellow weirdos, greetings from a perfect winters day down in The Daintree Rainforrest Nth Qld, hey has anyone ever gotten into the Ra teachings at all ?
@Steve. Wow, .lovely area in Australia.....Yes I have. I connect to Ra. Ra was spelt out to me years ago, so they are some of my spirit team I connect with. I resonate with them.
I came across an interview with Pat Buchanan, talking the "truth" about this "Deep state" or so called HCP's....the planet is run by people with filthy habits and sick minds...hmmm... I'm thinking TC should stop beating around the bushes and name/face who these people are?
That may not be so easy, unless it is written in the life contracts of the personalities of Illuminati (or HCP) that their membership would be exposed by the esteemed GAG. Similarly, the esteemed GAG is not about to disclose the identities of all the serial killers who have remained at large.
But it should be possible for the esteemed GAG to warn us about some specific govt advice/directive/order, issued in the name of controlling coronavirus, that are actually detrimental to public interest.
While the BLM is being manipulated by the Illuminati to topple Trump, probably many minions stirring up BLM may not know they are actually doing the bidding of the Illuminati.
I’ve learned from Paul Selig’s guides that whenever we talk about “should” it is the small self speaking.
The 8th Message to the Incarnated was pretty sobering. Q, The Guides, The Committee are all helping humanity to help itself. If we don’t want to focus on their messages that up to us.
BTW, they’re not after Trump, they’re after us, Trump’s just in the way.
Beating around The Bushes lol, any pun intended 🤣🤣
Ocho means eight.
August used to be the 6th month before the 1st Roman Emperor changed the ten month year to the 12 month year. October was the eight month not the 10th as it is now. December was the 10th now the 12.
The Augustus Cesar seems to have had complete control over even time. Yikes.
September (sept for seven) used to be the seventh month in Roman calendar, but two months July (for Julius Caesre) and August (for Augustus Caesre) were inserted after June and before September.
The Julian calendar of 365 days was adopted in 46BC by Julius Caesre, Augustus Caesre just changed the name of the eighth month to August in 8 BC.
So, Augustus Caesre was powerful enough to change the name of the eighth month to his name, but it was Julius Caesre who added two months to the ten-month Roman calendar. Hence the term Julian calendar.
Yes and it’ still all the same empire’s rulers ruling over us. The names change but the plan is the same. Always comes with hierarchical structures and the more rules and control and punishments needed the better. Power and control is the theme. Their play book is always divide and conquer. They want us divided, weak and obedient to them. They are part of us but such a small part. If we only stand up together their plans would melt like wax in the sun. Emperors, sultans, managers, monarchies, politicians, celebrities depend on us as the source of their power over us.
"Stand Up Together?" Could that mean we should all have to agree? For too many folks, that means precisely what I see as the problem.....coming together = agree with ME, discard your ideas and do what I PREFER.
Emperors, sultans, managers, monarchies, politicians and celebrities are HUMAN creations, equally ours to un-create.
@Patrick, I was remembering and trying to refer/include (in my clumsy way) the suggestion the TC made years ago that if we (together/collectively) stopped participating in the political system we would change the way things operate. It will never be ALL of us that agree to or with anything, but if enough of us (those governed) did then it is possible. I didn’t assume TC meant ALL of us needed to agree, so I could have expressed my thoughts more clearly. Perhaps I misunderstood their comment made back in 2016 (I think it was), but it stuck with me and even asked you if you planned to vote in the 2016 election after reading their comment. I’ll have to see if I can find the post and re-read it. Thanks to you and TC for all you do to help me understand.
Linda: There was nothing clumsy about what you wrote. I replied with the intent of playing Devil's Advocate.
Suggesting we need to "stand together" the deception, the phrase used to lure in the vulnerable. Among humans, no such thing can, does or SHOULD exist. We cannot co-exist as peaceful humans and stand together. Tranquility requires that we both express ourselves and accept it.
I saw what you wrote and used it to make this example. There was nothing clumsy about it. Overall, the issue is not "US vs THEM" when it comes to the HCPs and their paid subordinates in and a.k.a. the Deep State. Those groups exist because we create and perpetuate them. The conflicts are "US vs US" and the sooner we see this, then act differently, the faster things improve for everybody.
I loved this... The main purpose alien extra-terrestrial visitors might have in the near future is to explain to mankind what is happening as Earth events develop. This will have to be done with extreme caution, because too many people will become immediately convinced the appearance of alien extra-terrestrials and the cataclysmic events occurring around the globe are one and the same, that the end of the world at the hands of alien extra-terrestrials is about to occur.
Because to be honest what we have endured so far and so far to come. If Godzilla turned up now I think most people would be like 'meh' :-) lol
An interesting and timely 15 minute channeled speech by JFK, put out on August 4th by Pamela Aaralyn, with a request to share.
Sorry, forgot to include the link
to the speech by JFK. Here it is:
Thanks TV! I like Pamela - she is a good channeler.
I listened for about four minutes; far too patronizing, condescending and vague.
The statements sound JUST like the eye-wateringly hypocritical crowd who constantly bemoans removal and restrictions of rights, who simultaneously do many things TO INFRINGE RIGHTS then scream like adolescents when the blatant contradiction is brought to their attention.
Sorry to say but I lost respect for PA several years ago when I believe she was reading from another channeler's work as if it were her own. In looking back I verified that it was, indeed, word for word the same...
I wish PA well, and it matters not to me that other folks enjoy her work, but she's not my cup of tea...
@Patrick @irene I follow her periodically though I never suspected her of reading from another person's work though I never really read comments section.
The first 24 seconds into the video (the part about this information and YT and her website) made no sense. It was illogical.
“We need to end federalism” ? “Do not stand for federalism” ?
Here’s a bit from Wikipedia about Federalism,
“ Its distinctive feature, exemplified in the Constitution of the United States, is a relationship of parity between the two levels of government established. Federalism is thus a form of government in which powers are divided between two levels of government of equal status.“
JFK’s message is that it’s a good idea to get rid of the United States Constitution? Really? But then there’s mention of taking control of our national currency. How can you have a national currency without a nation - a country, in the case of the USA a federation of sovereign states?
And “globalism uses federalism to break down and undermine, dissolve and dilute nation states and national sovereignty”?
On the contrary...
Globalism is using socialism and communism to break down federalism! This has truth mixed with nonsense. And between all the
“you must...” do this and “you must...” do that and “Learn your roll” ,
“What is required is...” , well it wasn’t something I’d pay much attention to.
Does TC ever say we “must“, “what is required” here’s what you need to do- type of stuff? No they never do. I think this channel got her wires crossed.
Speaking of channeled info, Star Trek was in the United Federation of Planets.
I’ll stick to The channeled information provided on this site and instead of the paywall to hear what’s next from Abe Lincoln, I’ll make a donation to this site 👍
I said it is interesting, not that it is correct, .Yes, I also noticed those "you must" statements" but don't know who selected the wording. It has been stated by so many sources that the societies will turn more local, as opposed to "federal" or "global". Each and everyone can make their own conclusions of that video, I expected yours.
Federalism means more local control, less centralized authority; it goes in the opposite direction from global.
Oops, not in my dictionary.
Yes TV, I listened to the whole 15 mins and found JFK's message to be consistent with what the Committe, Erik, Matthew and Jesus have been saying in most channelings: you don't really need any big leader, the government, the European Union (that's why currency was mentioned), national banks (JFK calls it debt slavery), big pharma, big institutions, etc. to make decisions for you! "Your governments serve 1 percent of its people when it needs to serve 99" is one of many great quotes by JFK here! Another is "Together (me and you as individuals, not states or nations!) we stand, united we (me and you as individuals, not states or nations!) rise".
I found JFK's message very positive, empowering the individual (not the state, the nation, the federation, or the union in the case of the EU)!
YOU ARE KING (OR GOD, AS JESUS WOULD SAY)!
"FEDERALISM, mode of political organization that unites separate states or other polities within an overarching political system in a way that allows each to maintain its own integrity.
Federal systems do this by requiring that basic policies be made and implemented through negotiation in some form, so that all the members can share in making and executing decisions. The political principles that animate federal systems emphasize the primacy of bargaining and negotiated coordination among several power centres; they stress the virtues of dispersed power centres as a means for safeguarding individual and local liberties."
I’m guessing that’s why JFK was assassinated.
The Amendment post dated 6, December 2017 (one of 21 bell ringer subjects )
(If you haven’t read it....The reason he was assassinated, “...inability to control the president of the u.s.a.).
(A picture of Bugs Bunny coincidently the image for that post 🤓)
The other 20 bell ringers are just that. Probably good to read them all. There’s so much information already given by this site. 👍
I re-read TC’s guidanceson Cvid 19 again. The reason is last couple of days the UK health “leaders” ,government & MSM putting out conflicting, moments later reversing info, advice & dictats. It got to me- denting my understandings.
I also listened to 4 part videos of rountable talk which I’ll put in a link. I am trying to marry up TC’s advice to , well, the roundtable talk.
May I seek better understanding as I am feeling a bit shaky. That going out preferably with eye protection, not rubbing eyes (most common entry point) & mask for protecting of virus in air droplet is best course as I understand from a TC. The Roundtablers seem more convinced that no mask / eye protection is perfect enough.
Btw, working in healthcare, my amateur statistic collection, not 1% of patients lost to Covid , not had patients ringing up citing symptoms in the last few weeks either. As I wrote, just got a bit shKy from the recent dictats & messages eg ‘those with gum disease at more risk’ & more.
Grateful for feedback. Thank you all. Thank you Patrick for giving this forum that I can share & ask again to all to share thoughts. Grateful.
Why is everyone advocating federalism and local control? I thought we were all one and globalism facilitates linking more people together, and improving everyone's welfare at the same time, by more trade among nations, peoples, and regions. What happened to the idea of 'the World is Flat' and the world is 'One Village'?
Looks like many people are blaming the decline of American middle-class on international trade and globalism, all yearning for the good old days before low skill jobs were automated or exported to the third world. The middle class is a new phenomenon in many third world countries. But who cares if this middle class of Asians, Africans, or Latin Americans came at the expense of Americans.
If my low skill job is taken over by automation or cheap labour in Asia, and the fat cats are making more money, then we Luddites must rise up and revolt against computers, automation and cheap imports from China. But only if I can keep going to Costco and get my 60-inch flat tv for under US$1,000.
When that day comes (sooner than later), the living standard of everyone will collapse. The top 1% will lose 98% of their wealth, while life will become a real struggle for the remaining 99%. I don't really care if the top 1% loses trillions in wealth, I really care if my family become destitute.
@Stephen even if the 1 percent loses most of their wealth most likely that's going to trickle down to the rest of us who actually struggle with bills and can only dream of having a lifestyle that's carefree.
How about this idea?
You get to keep globalism, but you must live by the same rules the "low-skill" citizens are subject to.
There are currently limits on the number of high-skilled workers who can legally immigrate to the USA to work. You must agree to raise the quota of high-skilled workers from foreign countries to at least match the number of undocumented low-skill workers we have.
You will be competing with a greater pool of high-skilled workers, which will eventually lower salaries across the board. But this is good because you wouldn't want preferential treatment that protects your high-skill job when low-skilled workers have not been protected from floods of undocumented low-skilled workers! Right?
Also . . . since there are plenty of high-skilled workers with excellent educations in lower-cost countries, we should encourage more US corporations to move high-skilled jobs to those countries so that the 1% can increase their profits. There are plenty of engineers, tech, and scientists in those countries!
You may lose your job once we remove any barriers that now protect your job, but I know what you will not complain like those Luddite low-skill workers did when they lost their jobs to globalism.
@lorri not to belittle Stephen or his fear of globalism going away, but it's sort of like picturing a boat in the water with multiple holes in the bottom and Stephen is trying to keep bailing the water out to no success.
There is no protection for 'high-skill' jobs, never. Personally, I may choose to base my work location anywhere in the world. And anywhere I want to live, a work visa will be easy to apply legally.
Globalisation allows everyone to fully exploit his potential. Even if a person excels at something really trivial, by opening up the whole world as his market, he can do what he does best and live well. And everyone else who lives far and near, gets to enjoy the best of what he loves at the lowest cost with the widest selection.
'We are all one' will then become more than a slogan but a reality, and this tangible connection (of movement of people, goods and service) makes us all better off.
There will even be less excuse for illegal Mexican immigrants to cross the desert on foot, if they can fare well at their home village in Mexico, by connecting with customers around the world.
But make no mistake, globalisation and connection to everyone (the internet is a great first step) does not mean centralised control by some distant rulers. I think we give up our freedom when we demand the central government to solve every problem, rather than self-reliance.
Globalism where the same rules apply everywhere? That's never going to happen.
Illegal alien employees everywhere on Earth are attractive because they're illegal. If they were in another country with permission, they are NOT attractive potential employees.
Low & no skill foreign workers, or high education high skill, be it a dishwasher or electrical engineer, are attractive if they are less expensive.
So far, there has been protection for high-skilled workers in the U.S., by virtue of the fact there are quotas on foreign high-skilled workers. Potentially competitive high-skilled workers can't just flood into the market the way low-skilled undocumented workers have done. They are subject to immigration laws.
In that sense, you have enjoyed a protection that your fellow low-skilled citizens have not.
BTW, not all the jobs that have gone overseas are what I would term "low-skill" either. Take the furniture industry for example. In North Carolina, there were generations of furniture craftsmen with skills that took years to master. The industry started moving factories overseas in the 1990s. At first, it was low-end furniture manufacturers who made the move, because their products were more easy to build. Over time, the mid-range and high-end manufacturers made the move, though it took YEARS before they could get enough foreign workers skilled enough to their standards.
I strongly disagree that globalism allows everyone to do what they are good at. All those skilled furniture craftsmen who often came from a long line of furniture craftsman have had to give up what they loved doing!
When you have entire swaths of U.S. workers who've been displaced because their whole industry has been moved overseas, they just take what they can get.
As far as enjoying low prices, that is a vicious circle. I grew up in the 1960s and 1970s before the expectation of so many low-cost items were standard. Since the middle class was much larger due to decent wages, the NEED for bargain basement prices was much less.
People want to complain about the tactics of Wal-Mart, but millions of people who in previous generation never needed to resort so heavily to discount shopping have been reduced to shopping there. This is the result you get when you remove so much of the middle class with globalization.
I am old enough to remember how things were. I don't need to read an article to tell me the rich are richer and the middle class is smaller . . . and there is more poverty. I can see it.
Real wages have not risen for the majority of Americans since the 1980s. It takes more and more of the family budget to pay for basics. Both parents have to work, but have LESS in many ways than they used to have. More of the family is holding jobs, while housing, food, and healthcare have gone up in price.
People generally have to work harder for less, and more people are falling through the cracks having to work freelance jobs with no benefits. It's great that globalism has worked for YOU, but it's not working for so many.
Also, let us not forget that a lot of the factories that were moved overseas feature deplorable conditions (SLAVE LABOR) for those foreign workers.
Comment politeness & civility are boomerangs. Use screen names & pseudonyms. Comments are neither monitored nor moderated.