Unless I'm mistaken didn't tc tell us in the recent months that nobody that visit this website will come down with this virus. My only questions are 1. Has this changed for any of us. 2. I've been hesitant about getting a vaccine whenever it arrives will it be safe to accept it.
• No, The Committee did not say that.
• The Committee says the vaccine will be generally safe but not perfect, some bad reactions will occur, these rare incidents will be conflated to create fear and panic.
@Patrick this is the problem with not being able to remember something after a few weeks. I know I saw on here something along the lines that whaich I said I just need to pore over the posts and then comment section of the posts.
With apologies to my hero Jack LaLanne, my motto is if man made it, don't put it in your body
@Scott2, what they said, as far as I remember, was related to a particular post. TC probably said that nobody reading that post had death from covid as part of their life plan.
The revelation about Mosquito borne diseases is also interesting. I had been infected by dengue at least once and probably twice. Could it be the reason for the low mortality rate in India due to covid, compared to the population?
@santanu thanks I know I could remember something but I couldn't remember the exact words.
The "none of you" sentence can actually be found in Message To The Incarnated 2 dated 29 April 2020:
"Look back in the near future, at what you are observing about yourself now. You are observing leaders express great concern, and issue many commands, regarding your safety and well being. Much of this feeds the illusion such leaders pursue, for it is their life plan, in nearly every instance, to have taken on this role and acted in the ways you now observe.
These actions have almost nothing to do with your well being overall. You may safely ignore what you are ordered to do. If a serious complication from the sickness would lead to death, this was already planned by you. None of you reading these words are such a soul."
@et thanks also I'll be 39 in December and there's no reason why my memory shouldn't be able to remember something from a few months ago. Unless I designed myself to have a short term memory for whatever reason.
@Scott2, I have discovered that having a short term memory equates to more mental peace. So its not a bad thing after all :)
I’m confused. Since the virus can enter through eyes, why do we need to beware of people telling us to wear goggles? Not that I want to and probably wouldn’t. And if we question why, won’t they just say it’s because virus can enter through eyes? I’m just confused about what to be wary of what the problem is.
Wariness because if eye protection is going to be suggested NOW, why hasn't it been suggested all along? No doubt many of us have seen laboratory workers wearing suits which cover them completely, including a hood which looks like a beekeeper outfit used to work on hives.
Such protection and use aren't new, and have been used in viral, bacterial and toxin research for quite some time.
The Committee was being ironic.
Ohh, Norton Manx TT, 500cc, very similar to the one I had in the early 1960's...
If we already reached the point of someone intending to create and release ( or wanting to) a deadly virus onto us, what is going to stop them wanting to do it again, and again? Seems like we the general Phelps on this Planet are fucked and at the mercy of whoever these " knobs" are. Where am I Wrong here ?
The corona virus 19 was NOT intended to be released, it was intended to be used as a THREAT, like nuclear weapons. They only had to be used once; a threat was born.
Since the Chinese unintendedly but VERY effectively bombed Nagsaki & Hiroshima again, you're right, Steve...what will stop the use of threats?
A - W - A - R - E - N - E - S - S
Fear, fright, terror, face masks and "lockdowns" come into better focus
Here is a link to the first of several deep hypnosis sessions by Alba Weinman with Jill Cole.. Starting at 49:11, the commonly used "Higher Self" term is covered and also compared with the Spirit Guide term. In summary, the Higher Self is said to cover that 90 per cent or so of the Soul which is not in this incarnation. I enjoyed the entire video, but then that's me.
Except no higher self exists for humans but for the human misconception & determined insistence upon using this incorrect term. IT IS APPEALING TO MANY PEOPLE to be told you're limited and weak; that's what dogma is intended to achieve
Think "lock down" and "practice social distancing" as recently used.
Lockdowns are for prison inmates confined to their cells.
Social distancing is a personality trait or disorder part of psychology.
How about the correct terms, such as "home confinement" and "physical separation"?
Boarding a train, it's common to see "Mind / Watch The Gap" on the platform next to the edge. Why doesn't the message say "Practice Podiatry Safety" or "Cross & Enter But With Personal Risk"? Because those latter terms are vague, right?
Folks, the use of the term "higher-self" when discussing human souls, consciousness and awareness is intentional dogma generated by other folks who want to keep you thinking small, limited and relatively powerless.
Any part of your soul's knowledge not immediately in your awareness can be brought to you ANYTIME.
You cannot be higher than yourself.
I have gotten the message before, both from TC and you, Patrick. I am not defending the term which seems to be a red flag for you. The term is very widely used and I was merely getting at what they mean with it, when using it.
Odd, "weak and limited"? I interpret the term being used in the exact opposite meaning, i.e. strong and all powerful...
In the mighty I am series of books ( where st. Germain appeared and taught Guy Ballard on My Shasta ) St Germaine talked about the higher self Pat, why would an Ascended Master use and teach the term as well ? They have no interest in dogma or human terminology. ?
What you read Steve is a human misinterpretation.
• The Supreme Court of the United States even ruled that a slave was property. Of course, that made it right and true.
• Adolph Hitler expressed his views about Jews and acted on those views. Many prominent Germans echoed those sentiments and that made it true and accurate.
• Tobacco companies no only declared cigarette smoking not harmful, some even suggested inhaling cigarette smoke was beneficial. That of course made it true also.
An ascended master wouldn’t use the term. “Ascended Master“ is also a term one wouldn’t use. We are all equal in the eyes of God. Jesus doesn’t refer to himself that way either. More dogma and separation.
@ Linda, I have had the very special experience of being in the presence of an Ascended Master being channeled, I can assure you the energy is incredible, they most certainly do exist. God's eyes have nothing to do with it 😁
Who’s presence was it?
* Whose? (Not Who’s 🤓)
Anyone can use any term they choose. The question is, what do they mean with the term...
In my opinion, the best terms to use are those which are understandable to the readers/audience, not necessarily those which are the most correct, if they are not understood by the audience.
I once observed a colleague giving a talk to foreign potential customers, many of whom had deficient skills in English and no technical training. The colleague used terminology which is used in academic circles by highly trained specialists. I don't think his audience was impressed. One might just as well have used some other language not understandable to many.
"Higher" is relative, and holds meaning when compared to something "lower". When discussing the Earth's surface, this is easy to envision.
A seamount whose peak is far above the surrounding ocean floor is certainly a lot higher, but not to the ship passing nearby or the humans aboard.
For the soul of a human to be higher, part of that soul OR ANOTHER SOUL must be lower. Just like elevation above a physical surface.
• Which human is lower than another?
• Because all humans have souls, whose soul is thus lower?
• Is any human use of the word "lower" intended to convey superiority or equivalence? Generally not, it is used to describe inferiority.
• Which human is inferior? Blacks? Jews? Buddhists?
Well, we all have choices...you can fling terms around all day long to meet your preferences...or you can just do what the rest of us came here to do...listen to what the Committee has to say about it. I think the credibility is a little higher with them.
@ Tv The terms higher self and Ascended Master are not complex terms, by any stretch of the imagination, ide suggest it's up to the audience to do their learning and investigations as to the meanings, not for those who have learnt to " dumb down" the terms.
Linda, the beings I was fortunate enough to have experienced did not I'd themselves to us atm, there was no need, we were made aware early on we were being taught by those coming from the ascended master realm, they themselves are not actually keen on the labels either, as they don't like to be put on pedestals. But it is what it is, there are those who are from much higher realms, just like there are those from lower Astral realms... 😁
• No "higher" or "lower" astral realms exist.
• Humans love pedestals, and the Kardashians took good advantage. What else about them was special, unique and not available elsewhere?
Maybe fogged-soul could be a proper term?
Kardashian was merely a modern day Linda Lovelace with proper marketing and an entire tv network behind her. The Family just went along for the ride ! 😁
Im thinking some people like to create new terms to romanticise it. They think this is dungeons and dragons. ). Some just want the facts or jist of it and more importantly, the truth of it....and the Committee fills that bill better than anywhere else I've been.
Steve, do you include The Committee ascended masters?
Linda, No my " asumption" would be The Committee are of the angelic realm . 😁
Hi Patrick I was just thinking about channeling and to use an analogy but isn't channeling as simple as breathing as long as we know what were doing.
Even easier, but thinking + channeling do go together. Not thinking is what takes effort, the reason some new information can seem "hard" and/or "difficult". Our minds resist, attempt to invoke established habits, thus making an effort to put forth blockage..
@Patrick i know what you mean about how our minds resist. My mind tends to act like a broken record though I suspect that's intentional on my part because I'm only used to talking to myself not sure what my first reaction would be if tc or my guides started to talk to me.
My comment is in response to a reader question, not this actual post. I couldn’t find how to respond to the readers question so I am posting my thoughts here😁
“Why does Eric (I assume this question refers to Erik Medhus' soul and the website Channeling Erik) seem to have the courage to go out on a limb to answer certain questions such as the question of the giant and his encounter with the soldiers which made YouTube until it was yanked. Eric would have answered that straight on. I find The Committee can be very didactic and very unfriendly and more than that they lawed (?) over and disguised the answer to certain questions that they are obviously very uncomfortable dealing with. I used to love this site. I'm sorry that it is becoming bound intellectually.”
I have found that Erik comes through MANY mediums or channels. My perception is that it can be influenced by the “ channels” own beliefs. As many others I have read, followed for many years.
I, myself have come to find that I no longer absolutely believe everything every medium channels. At a hard time in my life when I needed answers or guidance, I payed a lot of money to many of the Channeling Erik mediums and found they all gave different answers.
I used to follow the Channeling Erik websites everyday but in my experience I have found that the turn over of mediums has been many. Not saying anything is wrong with that but I have found conflicting information on some of the same topics being channeled, thus I use my own intuition to feel what resonates with my gut.
I have tried other mediums also. I wasted a lot of money I could Not really afford looking for answers.
I, myself, have found the Committee to be the most resonating because they are honest. If they can’t answer a question because of it undermining the human collective they tell you. The answers sometimes are not what I want to hear but I believe they are honest answers.
I found with my many years ( and I am talking a lot) of contacting mediums And PAYING for the service....I find the Committee the most honest and to the point.
As far as the Channeling Erik mediums, I found the first ones the best.
Jamie Butler in particular. I cannot afford her. She charges 650.00 for a read.
I no longer pay for mediums or channels. I donate when I can to this website, wish I could donate more for Patrick, he does it for no fee and is blunt, to the point and so is the Committee.
My advice would be to take what feels right to you if it is from here or any other channel. It is your life and you get to decide what is right for your beliefs.
I posted this because I had an issue with the reader questioning the Committee’s gut to answer certain things. I think they answer a lot of things we humans sometimes don’t want to hear but they do it anyway.
So I said my peace😁 hope I did not offend the reader who posted the question. Just my own opinion ❤️❤️❤️
@Critter, I was going to write the same thing when I saw your post. Erik comes through many channels and all of those channels don't have the same receptivity and have different degrees of bias. In many cases I have found Elisa Medhus asking a leading question and almost forcing a yes answer from the channel. Not too long ago she picked up a bitter fight with a channel who claimed that Erik comes "better" through her than through others. I always prefer the conservative and matter-of-fact answers from TC. There are many things, knowing which may distort our life plans. There are predictions which don't have high probability ... yet many channels make such predictions. In 2015, TC predicted about Trump becoming the President and held onto it till the last. As far as I remember, Eric predicted a Clinton win but changed it a few times
Yes, exactly 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
This fits reasonabily well with my "convolution theory" about channellers and channeling.
The matter us that we have a transmitter and a medium that also is a transmitter.
The input signal has to meddle with the medium own signal, the result, following the msthematical theory of convolution, is a mix of the two, the signal and the carrier signal.
To recover the original message you have to know the setup of the carrier and de-convolve the mixed message.
I have to say that Patrick is a really good carrier, his messages are really easy to de-convolve
Have a nice day
@ Critter, my 2 cents worth as well. I think ANYONE who critisizes tc or how they deliver anything, has the right to voice their opinion, on the proviso that they don't let the door hit their Arse on the way out of the group , that's just me 😁😁
On the point of going to lots of mediums or sidekicks 😁 , I used to be a little obsessed with that in the 90s , until I realised, there wasn't actually only 1 possible way things would turn out in the future ( there are multiples) I think once someone realises that fact, they then see it is pointless paying someone to " read" the future for them 😁
In an old and by now classical model we incarnated humans have been compared to an onion which has many layers. If the core is considered as our physical body, then the next layer would be as our ethereal body, next layer as astral body, then mental body, followed by several more energetic higher vibration body layers. As we are multidimensional beings, many layers or bodies can be active simultaneously.
The highest vibration outermost layer of everyone is called "Higher Self" by many, without the words referring to location or position in any way, only to the highest vibrating and awareness aspects of ourselves.
You are spot on! Too bad I wasted so much money learning that lesson🙄😂🤣
I’m not above criticism or different opinions. I take them as a compliment, as long as nobody here gets personally insulted. Curiously, I don’t remember that ever happening.
"No supremely powerful being humans have named God holds this power, authority or control over mankind, the collective of humans on Earth."
What, God is not an omnipotent 'super-man' sitting on a throne in heaven overlooking every man and dictating every action on this planet? I fear for Patrick's safety from the American fundamentalists (after the preacher has his fun with the pool cleaner). And if Patrick dosn't repent right now, he will be thrown into the bottom of hell and be burnt alive forever.
Patrick, you won't be alone, at least you will have my company there.
My impression of God is the summation of ALL, including every man, animal, insect, tree, etc. But that aggregate entitiy also has a distinct personality. Just like a person is the aggregate of every cell in his body, and this aggregate entity has his own personality.
Therefore, when God acts, his action reflects the aggregate decision of everyone.
So those Atheists are also not very far from the "Truth".
No, atheists both miss widely but also come close. The belief no god exists, it's simply an imaginary sky wizard dreamed up by a few mental freaks? That's where they miss. We are god(s) ourselves, all together. The collective of our souls, and the interconnections which join all of us together, THAT is god. Oppps....God.
Where they come close is saying we're not lorded over by some omnipotent being who controls us, handing out favors and punishment according to his teachings, rules and truth.
@Stephen so would I be correct to assume I'll burn in hell forever with you and Patrick. Though I'm more in favour of burning churches than going to church so that probably assures me a place in hell 😏
Setting fire to other people's buildings is the best way to have them come set fire to YOUR buildings and maybe you, too?
According to some points-of-view, we're not going to burn in hell forever, WE'RE THERE NOW.
Okay, then.....please pass the vegetables.
@Patrick lol I'm definitely anti religion but, unlike that mel Gibson movie the patriot I think it's called where the British set fire to the church with the people inside I'm not that cold hearted or evil I'd only burn the church after it's been emptied out.
The best way to deal with a group of people, ideas, institutions or organizations with whom you disagree is: avoid & ignore them. Provided they ignore you equally.
We are DEFINITELY in hell NOW. ;)
Whether that pool cleaner is a person or a tool, I don't wanna know!!
Holy Shit, who even mentioned GOD !! 🙄🙄🙄🙄
Here's the result if extreme veganism: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8779687/Vegan-parents-starved-baby-nutrients-avoid-jail.html
I don't see much difference between "extreme veganism" and plain old "garden variety" of veganism. (Pun absolutely intended).
Years ago after my daughter had orthodontic work, was told not to chew for a few weeks, to liquefy everything in a blender, eat from a spoon, swallow like yogurt.
A close female relative by marriage, not my wife or her sister, but closely related nevertheless (Gee, who could that be?) swept into town to "take care" of my daughter for the duration. This amounted to preparing food, period.
Steady daily concoctions of vegetable and fruit purees, blends and you name it went down the hatch. After a few days I could see my daughter looking weak and frail. One week in she was out of energy. I sneaked her some Greek yogurt, against the strident wishes of her grandmother, which helped my daughter a lot but only for one day, then the yogurt ran out when I did, too, out-of-town a few days for work.
Upon returning my daughter was worse than ever. I boiled and peeled three eggs, broke them up with a fork, added butter, a pinch of black pepper and my daughter practically inhaled them. Inside of ten minutes her energy returned, and she looked like she'd been reborn.
This story would give more than a few vegans fits. I suspect the vegan diet attraction functions along the lines of extremist fundamentalism. It offers more than diet; it represents a faith of sharp, dark contrasts, relieving the participant of decision, nuance and conflict. It offers social status, often worn with pride, damned be nutritional science.
Ever hear the joke "How do you know someone is vegan? THEY TELL YOU."
I think diet decisions are personal and above criticism but when vegans announce themselves, they are somewhat to outright hostile to diet questions, such as "how do you get enough protein and fats?" You are expected to praise and admire but not inquire, just join. They come across as cult.
@Patrick I have thought it's funny how eating meat can be a big source of protein but these people will cling to there bars shakes. Btw, that female family member is that your mil on your wife's side which I remember you talking fondly of 😁
Interesting anecdote Patrick where all these things can lead to. I had close encounters too. A strong fundamentalist belief. Often leading to a cult. This can lead to violence also. There was my ex., she was a vegetarian (no meat but milk is ok). Her "cult" also considered garlic and onion as non-veg. So she had a nose for detecting such things in food. Even smell of meat and fish irritated her. And god forbid if anyone by mistake added such things in her food. It would be hell on earth. It was a constant fight with others and with self over food. I don't know how people manage to create such suffocating problems in life
hi Patrick I was just watching a video where supposedly we will be experiencing a new pandemic next year and I was just curious if that will actually occur.
No, but the current one will "continue" along for a while until the media governmental operators have milked it for as much benefit as possible.
If you're referring to this video https://youtu.be/89s-8X453_M what I found interesting about it is when she said we have just dodged a bullet - we have recently moved into a less disastrous timeline.
So my question to the Committee is: have we somehow moved into calmer waters?! If yes, how did we do such a thing?
"Briefly and temporarily, yes." says The Committee. "You humans didn't do it, it is happening around and to you all, affecting behavior of course, making things seem as if collective human decisions are completely responsible. This is not the case now."
(I didn't watch the video, I don't review them or books, essays, articles or movies.) I simply ask The Committee or someone's guides to respond.
@Scott, probably just treating the virus like a new Apple or Samsung product, assuming we require a " updated" version every year !😁
@Steve it was a video by lorie ladd and I know I sound like a sexist pig but I find her videos have a double appeal listening to her messages and looking at her at same time. 🐷😁
Bummer about being in Straylia is the debates at 11am , can't really get into pop corn , I find it such a nighttime thing ,! 🤔🤔
Record it and watch later, quarantine yourself from all potentially contagious news exposure until.
The 'Trump Doctrine' earns President third Nobel Peace Prize nomination (Video 4:09 minutes):
This video segment describes several big motivations to remove Trump ASAP. You who live outside domination of news by the USA's bigger media players can appreciate from this why Trump's support is almost impenetrable among USA voters.
Can the Committee say yes or no if Trump will win the Nobel Peace Prize?
I hope he does!
"Yes" says The Committee, "President Trump will be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize."
@Scott, I tried watching her stuff, but she takes ambiguity to a whole new level, too many it's, but, maybe, for me 😁
@Patrick lol it might be me but it seems like anytime I see a female channeling its always a pretty woman like where's the chubby chicks or less than bombshell female channeling. Patrick has the same problem yeah he's good looking but nah I'm not watching any YouTube videos unless he can get claudia to sit and be the eye candy while he talks. That said please don't kill me Patrick 😁
Oops I meant @Steve not Patrick
This debate is a trip
@Laura I watched 30 minutes before we taped the rest and will watch it tomorrow. But geez people say kids can be immature and well childish but the first 30 minutes was just embarrassing for either side if you actually want to discuss the topics and have meaningful conversation.
Everyone was talking all at once. Biden started calling Trump names. It was a mess.
More or less that continued throughout the debate
Seemed to me that Trump was debating Chris Wallace and sleepy Joe. More so Wallace. Biden didn’t seem to answer to much of anything he was actually asked🙄🙄🙄
Calling the President "Clown" was not what I expected to see :)
The Presidential debate felt as chaotic, frustrating and disturbing as the past few months have been, but at least no one got punched out!
The highlight for me was when Trump dropped the bombshell about Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and the sketchy multi-million dollar "business" deals made with China, the Ukraine and the wife of the mayor of Moscow while Joe Biden was Vice President. The debate would have been so much better without snarky Chris Wallace's frequent interruptions and insisting on jumping to the next topic just when things were getting good.
Wallace is Deep State or however you want to put it. Hes paid to be biased against Trump. Not sure if you already got that or not.
I think it was a fizzer, I think there should be a WWE type ring, that they both get into after the debate, Joe would be fighting from the Pale White Corner and Don from the Bright Orange Corner. 5 by 3 minute rounds No Holds Barred !! 😁😁
Could the Esteemed Committee answer questions on the Estonia disaster which in 1994 killed over 800 people on its voyage to Stockholm?
In recent news divers have discovered a previously undetected hole in the hull of the ship leading to speculation about the actual cause of the disaster.
What caused the ship to sink?
Was there an intentional coverup and why?
Was the ship used to smuggle military equipment?
Thank you kindly. God bless the lost souls.
This is a criminality question. I don't address them, generally. Sometimes I get a background description to a sinister situation but matters of innocence or guilt or descriptions of circumstances, such as this one, where the information could quickly lead to ideas of personal innocence or criminal responsibility, almost always draw radio silence.
One additional question to be added
What caused the hole that was recently discovered on the hull?
Question through "Contact" page.
Also called him a clown. I don't recall Trump using any direct insults or rebukes like "shut up" against Biden. Very good move.
Wallace didn't ask anything about Biden's 47 year record, only about Trump's record. hmm...bias much?
-Best line of the night: We're talking about your son Hunter, Joe.
-Best line: Biden: I do not support the New Green Deal.
Yes! I thought Chris Wallace was very biased. He sure took it easy on Joe but argued and reprimanded Trump a lot.
Trump "going on easy" on Biden?
It seems that I didn't detour in the right universe
Have a nice day
Let's see....Biden told the President of the United States to shut up, called him a clown and a liar. Trump didn't respond to the insults.
If you understood Trump going easy on Biden meant Trump would suddenly be "nice" and "gentle"....
@Patrick if I remember correctly I might've been the guilty party that thought trump would be nice and gentle. Apparently last night he brought up biden's deceased kids and wife which apparently had Joe misty eyed. I haven't watched the bulk of the debate but geez it sounds rather low to bring up family when I'm not sure if Joe has really attacked trump's kids.
We have two more debates to go and also the VP Debate. That should be interesting.
Spotted by viewers, it appears that Joe Biden was wearing some sort of wire during last night's "debate."
Yep, looks liket it. Someone here below made a video about it!
Presidential debates are nothing but Kabuki Theater.
I couldn't make out a word when all three men were talking at the same time. The first rule of public debate is learning to CONTAIN YOURSELF until it's your turn to speak.
Thank you, Lorri ! I hadn't seen that term in so long, I barely recognized it and completely forgot what it means.
It's interesting for us to watch, knowing the outcome of the election well in advance, isn't it?
Yesterday I saw a short headline suggesting the next debate would have a microphone switch controlled by....the moderator?
Really? The press is going to have the authority to shut off the President of the USA while he discusses and debates public policy with the opposition? REALLY ? I don't care how much they talk over one another, I want to hear even that! I don't give a flying fig what the press prefers...or the candy canes out in voter land who can't handle it. Did Biden voters, Democrat Party officials and certain very sympathetic press organizations...(CNN...cough, cough...) notice how Biden told Trump to shut up, called Trump a liar AND A CLOWN?
How many times will the moderator shut off Biden?
KABUKI THEATER is right....
These individual reports from the ships reporting GPS outage/failure are very interesting. https://navcen.uscg.gov/?Do=GPSReportStatus
I can understand how reliable navigation using GPS may come to an end if these incidents start increasing in duration and numbers
"Military interference with GPS"
The USSF ?!? The Committee says: "No. The GPS satellite disruptions are being caused by solar energy. Military disruption of such a system would be too revealing and unnecessarily invasive. Such a military force is always more effective when operating unnoticed."
There have been situations where Russia interfered with the functioning of the GPS. Such as during NATO joint military exercises in Northern Scandinavia a couple of years ago.
Solar activity should have interferenced all over the world , not just Mediterranean and Red sea... Maybe I'm wrong...
Trump didn’t bring up Bo Biden. He was talking about Hunter Biden and his crap with taking 3.5 million from a Russian Mayors wife, it was Joe that went off about Bo. Trump listened and then told him he was talking about Hunter. If I have my facts straight...that is what I heard and watched. I don’t believe Trump ever mentioned Bo Biden.
I don’t know if Joe was trying to use Bo to get off the subject of Hunter’s activity or if he just was having a “Joe” moment.
Now now give Biden his due, he and his family managed to grift and launder millions of dollars from China, Ukraine and Russia while he was in office (Obama).
All done while directing the spying operation on a rival presidential candidate (Trump) and then taking down his appointee General Flynn....
and Trump being accused and impeached by democRats for collusion with Russia...
Biden is no slouch when it comes to corruption. He's quite possibly one of the most corrupt Vice Presidents in American history!
@critter my mom told me about it I guess she heard it on fb or wherever so it might be somewhere between truth and fake news. I just thought that if he did do something bad well ok but hasn't everyone done something bad even once in there lives and trump I'm sure doesn't walk on water despite what some people might like you to think.
Yes, I can confirm that Trump questioned Hunter Biden's highly irregular foreign business dealings (which are currently under active investigation.) Biden then scoffed at Trump's accusations, and deflected the question by bringing up his deceased son, Beau. Trump then reiterated that he was talking about Hunter, not Beau.
I can't help but notice that Joe Biden often brings up the past tragedies in his life. His son Beau died of brain cancer, and his first wife and infant daughter were killed in a car crash. Playing the sympathy card has apparently served him well during his 47 year career.
@saint irene yeah I have noticed he brings up his deceased family members somewhat regularly. His track record in politics should matter a lot more especially when he's running for president.
What is his track record in politics?
@Linda I got no idea but unless your kids badmouth the other person or there kids than it should be fair game to retaliate if that's the way you want to respond. In that regard I think trump made a poor judgment call when I'm sure there's things he could've gave Joe a cheap shot or snide comment on.
I think you missed the point.
I think the one loser in all of this is the image of United States and its politics...
Some see a different image of America, reflected by the choice of the American people.
The division and lies told to weaken President Trump and America are the voices of control.
@linda they might be the voices of control but the minute more and more Americans wake up to what's happening those voices of control will run for the hills.
Lively debate is healthy. We’re taught by the system of
to control to control even that! No thanks.
Btw, here’s some news posted today...
Steve Scully - moderator 2nd Presidential Debate
"While attending college, he served as an intern in the office of Delaware Sen. Joseph R. Biden, ...."
Wow, what a coincidence.
Was Biden wearing a wire at that debate?
Ever play a board game with a sore loser? When they realize they are going to lose they flip the board over in their tantrum.
As was pointed out earlier, the 1896 book mentioned, is the future predicted.
How else does Kamala get elected in 2025 knowing what we know now? Keeping us asleep and unaware of the deep corruption And control methods allows it to continue. Sharing the information given here helps wake people up.
@linda I will admit if I had heard and read that book before trump was even candidate I wouldn't even have considered trump as president. It makes me think what else will happen that I won't be anticipating.
President Trump and the First Lady just announced they tested positive for COVID-19.
@Critter you beat me to it lol
By this time, I guess eveyone has been exposed to covid, I have recovered from high fever for 3 days. Did not test.
Fox News .... Grave Concerns for our Beloved Potus !!
CNN ..............The Clown Has Caught It !!! 😁
odds 19 out of 20, he will emerge from this without issues at all.
And this will bring him more voters
Have a nice day
It’s not about COVID. It’s about action being taken and prepared for.
Prayers and healing light for the President and First Lady. The energy during, and following the Presidential debate has been so intensely negative that I think everyone is being given a much needed spiritual time-out. All is well.
On another note, there is a new Matthew message (October 1, 2020)
Channeling Jesus and Ananda ( https://youtu.be/aeLRof04VR8 )
explained it well.
It’s like a dark net is being cut away.
Dark to Light.
God bless us All.
Meanwhile, back in the more interesting world, what's the scoop on the malfunctioning GPS gear 🤔🤔
Pat, I'm currently staying up at my sister's place in the Daintree Rainforrest, and I must say, that tree in your picture would not look out of place in here. ( Tropical)
Comment politeness & civility are boomerangs. Use screen names & pseudonyms. Comments are neither monitored nor moderated.