Hi Patrick over on channeling erik they did 3 videos with Kim Babcock about humans evolving over 1 thousand to 100 thousand years but tc says we have 15 centuries I was just wondering why the big difference between timelines thanks
Great question (I didn't see the videos) and The Committee says, "What level of evolution or development and along which future course of events chosen?"
The videos were titled humans in 1000 10000 and 100 thousand years but I like this article too
Interesting that Erik also said humans would become inter-dimensional and that Big Foot is an inter-dimensional being.
Our souls already are, and always have been. The change will be our physical bodies will also be able to make the transition to a degree currently impossible.
Great article again Patrick. When will human kind admit they are totally wrong about climate science and will we discover soon that a change in core magnetics is a major cause of our weather and climate?? Thanks again
We humans are right about a lot of "climate science" and disagree about other things; just ask Al Gore.
The Committee has explained some factors causing weather patterns or events but these will not be accepted until we have proof which fits the evidence we're prepared to accept.
Scientists won't accept The Committee's explanations because they can't be verified with instruments and measurements we currently know. All in due time....
Now how could scientist's instruments detect anything beyond inner or outer earth? Such CRUDE instruments have built-in "prejudiced perception," and as such cannot be designed to find what it does not know exists in the first place. Ghost Busters as example, LOL. There are psychic "dream scientists" who use their inner senses and inner feeling tone in this regard and they are successful, but most keep silent...ron
Just like the band that always wrote while in REM sleep used to say, ... "it's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine",
Then there were these other lads from Dublin who used to say "Someday, Bloody Someday", with the Fab Four adding "Here comes the Sun...." If I were,to Imagine Dragons in my sleep, I'd probably say, "Welcome to the New Age" ....
Instead of "Welcome to the Jungle".
Having 7 billion+ humans inhabitants, the planet can certainly use a break.
The demise of humanity in 1,500 years means there will not be time for another civiisation to evolve, in case we screw up again (as in the ages of Atlantis or Lemuria). This is our last chance!
I read that some ET's have developed over millions of years (since the time of dinosaurs!). Comparatively speaking, humanity seems just a 'quick experiment' to try out some extreme scenarios.
Good news: since the pace of technological advance is rather quick, 'Star Trek' days will come to humanity soon. May be another 300 years?
I wish to be able to re-incarnate again then, and dash around in space with captain Picard.
Does mankind's demise means physical extinction and disappearance or a change to the physical properties of human bodies such that human societies barely resemble what we now take as given?
How do we know alien extraterrestrials developed over "millions of years"? Whose years, ours? Just as our perceived limits of distance measured in light years do not apply in higher dimensions, the same relationship exists with & for "time".
Star Trek days will be revealed and how fast we are given the technology depends on us. Frankly, I do not see mankind currently anywhere close to managing space travel technology to anything other than our great detriment. It would be like giving loaded guns to a group of ten year old boys.
Okay, so I was thinking last night that 1,500 years is not a very long time before everything ends here for humans!
You wrote: "There will no more desire for incarnation into a physical body, it will not be seen as worth the exercise.
Human physical bodies are going to evolve to a point where inter-dimensional existence will be common; this has
already happened on Earth, with what are called sasquatch. Subsequent to the ability to shift dimensional existence
of a physical body, will come the development of a body which transcends the physical restraints human now have."
Considering what you wrote and how you answered Stephen above, are you saying that it's 1,500 years for humans to have bodies more as we know them, and then after that to still be on earth at least some of the time, but in new bodies that spend time in other dimensions also?
The Committee is saying it.
What we don't know is....1,500 years for the process to start, end or does it all occur POOF! in an instant? We'll know better in fourteen centuries and going forward.
Patrick, my space friend gave me a similar analogy when we discussed the advent of nuclear bombs during WWII. He likened it to babies playing with hand grenades. That is one cardinal reason space ships began showing up in our atmosphere...over concern as the explosions created reverberations throughout the cosmos...they felt the blasts and they crying out of mega 1,000's of souls...there was-is a probable reality whereby Hitler developed atomic bombs and the missile delivery systems and global holocaust ensued. However, although many earthlings incarnated to experience that particular reality, we did not choose that future probable path...ron
the ultimate destiny of our star is well known to current science, and the scenario depicted by the Committee is the same: our star will switch to elium fusion, expanding its diameter and reaching the size of Venus orbit, or more. The heat and radiation will sterilize earth reducing it to a bare rock. THen the sunn will shrink and become a red dwarf..
THis will happen between three or four billion years from now. In the meantime our galaxy will "collide" (more likely, merge) with the Andromeda galaxy.
What really strikes me is to aknowledge that our specie is going to be extinct in less than 2000 years. It is a really short time period, considering that we are wandering on this planet (as a discernable species) by at least by 5 million years.
It seems a relatively "soft" extinction: we are supposed to go from 7-8 billion individuals to zero in 1500 years it means that population have to endure a mean loss of 5.3 million people each year. Even considering that usually what we experience is (as mean values) a steep downlope in the first third, and a smoother downslope in the remaining part, like the right side of a bell shaped curve.
We will possibly lose about 2-3 billion people in the first 300 years (this will be the slope of net death/birth processes).
So, If my scenario is right, deaths will surpass births by about 10 million people each year for a prolonged period.
Considering the available statistics, this rate seems still pretty smooth: in the 1900-2000 period, the world population increased around 45 million people each year, so a loss of 10 in the hardest periods will not be seen as cataclismic.
But it will be a period of relentless decline, loss of material wealth. I wonder how the culture will be affected by a similar environment. For sure consumerism will be soon a dead ideology, never to be recovered.
It feels funny to me thinking that our age will be seen as a mythic age of gold by the future generations... is seems really sad to me.
We have not been "wandering on this planet" for anything CLOSE to a million years, much less five million. About hundred thousand. Cro-magnon and Neanderthal 95-100 thousand years ago, Lemuria 50-90,000 years ago, Atlantis 20-40,000 years ago.
I don't interpret mankind as becoming physically extinct in 1,500 years but rather the current physical parameters and properties change completely. It could also be that we remain somewhat unchanged physically but our minds and behavior become completely different. Like domesticated German Shepherd dogs, huskies and wolves; great physical similarities with very distinct behavior.
Future generations will not see us sadly, just as we do not see childhood as a deficient part of human life. We make far more good decisions than bad, and we are getting better and better at pointing out the bad, ignoring the good.
There is lots of conspiracy theory articles concerning Agenda 21 about various governments plans to depopulate the earth by war, disease and anything else possible. It's even written on the Georgia Guide Stones. Seems like this isn't going to happen? Even with the threat of WW3 this isn't going to happen. Would our extra terrestrial friends step in if ICBM's were actually launched?
There will be no human-being-on-Earth induced population reductions.
Our ET friends stopping nuclear weapons? No, but they could.
Our Guardian Angel Guides - including a large part of the hierarchy - would simply prevent the weaponry from being launched in the first instance. This has already happened.
The North Koreans recently attempted to launch two unarmed test missiles, both of which malfunctioned on the launching pad. These were sabotaged by the USA and Russia, intentionally and in a coordinated effort BUT the information, ability and decision were supplied by the Guardian Angel Guides of the saboteurs, who firmly believe they were acting in their national interests and under instructions from their respective leadership.
Russia does NOT want the headache of North Korea launching missiles on its back door any more than any country. The North Korean leader's statements towards and about the USA speak for themselves. It can be very dangerous to make threats at the USA; Americans tend to under-react at first but pay very close attention; because history has demonstrated how threats often precede acts; the unknown is WHEN. At a very unpredictable moment Americans will preemptively act to remove the ability to carry out the threats.
North Korea knows this instinctively; what is going on there is for internal political power, influence and posturing.
Always fascinating Patrick , thank you . I wonder what will happen to sweet loving Gaia Mother Earth's soul ? Will she be sad as earth slowly decomposes ? Will she miss human life or animal and plant life ? Will she be like a human that is slowly dying and her soul , psyche and interest and energy is elsewhere interested in new frontiers ?
No, no more or less will happen to the soul of a planet than would happen to a person. She will always be a part of our individual souls and also collectively. Remember, there is no time and souls do not expire or disappear. There will be no sadness, just great appreciation and gratitude for the experience, just as happens with all of us individually.
Wow Patrick! Really fascinating reading.
I had some questions.
What is the future of the internet? When will it be "destroyed" for a lack of better term?
What will happen to all the souls that have returned to Source? Will they retain their individual awareness?
The internet stays. We go back to Heaven as we always have, many times before. Yes, we ALWAYS retain our individual awareness, as we choose. It can never be taken from us against our will, desire and choice.
Great to read you again - made me happy inside, although I completely support any vacation you need and for any length of time. We all love and support you work.
Marcus with angels and guides.
An aquaintance on FB posted this link to this very short book which I think everyone here will love. I won't explain about the book.. It only takes about an hour to read as it's very short. Here is the link...
Agora eu entendo melhor por que que eu morei no Brasil há muitos anos. Foi parte do processo. (A tradução p'ra quem não o fala):
Now I understand better why I lived in Brazil many years ago. It was part of the process. (Translation for whom does not speak it)
Susan, muito obrigado, te agradeço.
Patrick. Great you got to experience Brazil :-) What were you doing in Brazil?
This means Thank you I think? .muito obrigado, te agradeço
I was trying to find out more information about the Author of that book, but couldn't find much. D. Alan Holmes. I wonder if he is in spirit? If he is, maybe you could channel him for the readers? or the Committee could say??
I lived in Brazil for 2 years, sent by the company for which I worked. I had to learn the language well and quickly or lose my job. It was easy - Brazilians are such great, great people. Um lugar ôtimo, sempre quando eu visito o Brasil, eu me sinto em casa. (A great place, always when I visit Brazil, I feel at home.)
What I wrote there in Portuguese means, "thank you very much (much obliged) I appreciate it from you."
I wouldn't channel that author if he's in Heaven, that would become a book review.
Thank you so much Susan, this book is wonderful, I had a lovely time reading it...
@Lysa... You're welcome. It was a fascinating read (huh) :-)
"In tribute to L. Ron Hubbard". An unfortunate introduction to an otherwise enlightening read.
Why unfortunate, Alex? I've heard of L. Ron Hubbard, but never read his books; New Age philosophy author of sorts?
L. Ron Hubbard was the founder of Scientology.
Hi Susan I'm not sure if this book was meant to be truth or fiction but I'll refer to Patrick and tc
@scott...Well, I would say it's fiction, but it's also true ;-)
Lol Susan I'm not match to play mind games with anybody lol you heard of books for dummies lol I'm no dummy but sometimes my brain tries to trick me
Fascinating reading ;)
The only comment that comes to me is a line from the movie "my neighbor Totoro", where the two sisters happily cry "It was a dream, but it wasn't a dream!"
It is strange as things said in this book merge so deeply with a lot of the understandings given by the Committee, while detach so neatly in other things.
The Committee says "the book is a court trial witness' oath; the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."
@Patrick thanks that's why I relied on u and tc but I will admit I've never read a book like that before anyway thanks again Patrick and tc
All of us on the material plane got STUCK in a body, while playing a too involving GAME?
We're not stuck - we're here voluntarily - and it's not a game unless we want to see it that way.
@pierluigi gotta love the human experience where tc is things make sense but it gets muddy when we decide to be human
That's why we do it - for the mudbath.
Lol Patrick if I remember correctly Mr worf doesn't like mudbaths lol oh well
Patrick, I'm as always elated to read all this good stuff from you and The Committee. A question that may be unrelated to the extinction of earth but occurred to me: How do our physical bodies feel about their eventual demise when we die? A very talented medium on FB channeled body parts and organs and their consciousness which was very interesting. It makes me sad to hear the inevitable destruction of our beautiful earth and the breathtaking beauty in so many parts of the world, the oceans, beaches, etc. Misplaced emotions?
We will be LONG gone before Earth changes to the point where we might consider it destroyed. We will be grateful for the opportunity and experiences.
An interesting question about body parts, I must say! Let's ask The Committee:
"Your body and its parts are not you. Once departed permanently your soul, the body perishes. Where should the distinction between a whole body and a part of it, be drawn? A person born without limbs or digits, typical of the vast majority, is not incomplete, only different. The loss of a portion of the body likewise makes nobody and no person, incomplete. You are not and can never become a car missing a wheel. The inference that feelings, perceptions and emotions of one part of a human body, while the soul which - who - occupies it, remains alive, are simply a reflection of the soul, through that one part or portion. The liver sees not what the leg does, just as an eye is not the skin. Each part's function might be a segmented view of the whole, yet is always of the whole.
The demise of the body is not felt by either the departed soul or the body; the former no longer attaches value or importance to it as when formerly alive and the latter decomposes, returning the molecules to other places, without negative, ongoing consequence."
@Patrick.... Oh very cool :-) Yes, they are lovely people.
I'm sure the author is pleased we all have read his amazing book so maybe not a book review, more just a thanks for writing it conversation etc...