A reader sends a video I haven't watched (yet) but he the reader asks a great question, which I quote:
"From 12.22 they talk about the higher self, just wondering why [The Committee] don't seem to acknowledge this higher self explanation?"
Without watching the video.....The Committee has said many a time, the problem is NOT that a human soul has compartments, divisions, sections, parts and pieces. Not at all......these are like rooms in a house or building.
The problem is: saying "higher" self implies automatically a lower self exists. "High" is completely, entirely and utterly relative in meaning, absent impartial physical height and altitude measurements, and even in such cases, relativity enters the mix. High for a drone is not high for a Boeing Triple Seven. "Higher" has ZERO meaning until compared with some thing else.
No human soul is lower than itself, not in parts, not in pieces, not in any way, shape or form. Use of the term implies and teaches humans to believe otherwise, erroneously.
Please add in the comments, your direct questions for The Committee. (I haven't watched the video, its title entices.)
Comments for & between readers are not moderated — Submit questions on the QUESTIONS page. If applicable, include the post's title. Some Q&A submitted might appear anonymously. By doing so, consent is granted for anonymous use. All questions will be considered anonymous and confidential, please do NOT use your real name.