According to TC, the hominin species we call Homo Habilis and Homo Erectus WERE the first "humanoids," created from a mixture of (ancestral) simian and alien DNA.
Q1. Are those the only "humanoid" species created by extraterrestrial visitors?
A: The DNA was not so ancestral, as this word is used and understood. It was the DNA available then, and is the same today.
Q2. Is the earlier genus that we call Australopithecus (which appears in the fossil record about 4-3.5 million years ago) excluded from this picture?
A: No, it is another variation of initial alien ET created humanoid and the timeline to which you refer is wildly inaccurate and far too long in the past of Earth timelines.
Q3. Were the Australopithecines evolved entirely from native earth species, or were they too created by extraterrestrial visitors?
A: Entirely created by alien ET visitors. They are not the product of evolution.
Allow us a brief explanation; the objective was function, not appearance. The vast majority of genes and chromosomes were left intact, the many which determine outward appearance, size, shape and all the other variations which occur in all species on Earth. The process of inheritance and random appearance based on the way genes mix, was left unaltered. The DNA mixture, modification and design changes were made in two ways; one to adapt the newly-to-be created beings to the environment by altering the DNA structure and latticework, to include the traits necessary for certain size, strength, stamina in the environmental conditions.
Many variations of other characteristics, unrelated to function, were left unaltered and to occur randomly. As you know, height is not a requirement for strength, and so forth.
Humans have today identified variations and deemed them species, when race is a far better description, in current human language use.
Cro Magnons and Neanderthals are generally regarded as two totally different species within the genus Homo--and they were by no means the only hominin species present on earth 100,000 years ago.
C: Yes, they were the only humanoid species and they are two versions of the same process. A Chevrolet and a Pontiac.
The Committee says that the hybridization, or genetic upgrade of existing humanoids (presumably Homo Erectus, since Homo Habilis appears to have gone extinct over 1 million years ago)….
C: There were no humanoids on Earth before a thousand centuries ago. Only simians, and what are now called sasquatch, big foot or yeti are evolved from them.
….occurred about 100,000 years ago all over Africa. Just Africa?
C: Just Africa, initially.
Q4. Did the hybridization involve ONLY Homo Erectus specimens, or were other "humanoid" species involved as well?
C: The different species humans today wish to identify as separate and manifesting along different timelines and intervals of Earth history, are simply variations of the first humanoids created. Simultaneously.
Q5. Were Neanderthals given genetic upgrades before they went extinct?
C: It is not accurate to say Neanderthals went extinct; they did not reproduce with the same DNA. When the upgrade decisions to DNA were made and applied, this was done to the ovoid and spermatozoa, so that their offspring would be the upgraded version. When the previous humanoid with the now obsolete DNA died a natural death, so did their type.
Q6. Approximately how many times have extraterrestrial visitors intervened in our natural evolution, from the creation of humanoids until today?
C: Twice, in macro terms. The individual interventions have been in the many thousands, as part of each process. The initial creation was not an intervention; the narural evolution of all other existing species was left intact.
Q7. Are they still intervening and modifying the human genome today--or have they done so over the past hundred years?
C: No, this has not been done for more than nine hundred ninety nine centuries.
More Reader Q&A, from a comment to the previous post.
Q1. Difference in race and skin color, a major problem in our society: Was this introduced at the very beginning at the "Garden of Eden" location?
C: Human reaction and behavior can be a problem. The tone and hue of skin are only socially meaningful because of voluntary choices.
The DNA source code which allows humans to change and adapt to physical surroundings was introduced very early in the hybridization process, but also during the creation of the very first humanoids. It was expanded as hybridization was done.
This is the source code which holds latent ability to become taller, darker, lighter or otherwise, based on environmental effects and influences.
Early humanoids were more heavily muscled, with more stout skeletons than are usually found, although examples of such people exist everywhere now, if the minority. The purpose was physical work; what would seem tough to a woman but easy to a man, is a current comparison. It was as easy for the early first humanoids to perform what would be seen as very tough physical work, as it is for current humans to perform what is called housework.
Q2. No offence to anyone...but I always thought that people of different races looked eerily similar to apes/monkeys available locally. Is it proper to assume that different races have predominant characteristics from apes/monkeys available locally? And did these races have different types of ETs as source?
C: The different races on Earth have evolved since the creation of humanoids, and the resemblance to certain apes is not a coincidence, as DNA was indeed taken from them, in the form of chromosomes and genes. Bear in mind, a single gene or chromosome is itself a complex DNA atomic structure. In some cases these were used for the function they represented; appearance of humanoids was not a concern. The creation was very much function over form. The alien extraterrestrial visitors who created humanoids looked nothing like either any current humans, or early humanoids before current humans, not any of you then a thousand centuries ago, or now. Appearance was not a care or consideration.
(Personal sidebar - into a house across the street from my childhood home moved a Nigerian doctor [Ibo, not Yoruba or Hausa] and his family, during the 1970s. Except for the oldest daughter, who'd already spent a fair portion of her formative years in Nigeria, the younger siblings, some of whom had been born in the USA, became culturally and linguistically Americanized very quickly, at least outside the house, and my fast friends. They had not yet learned any American social taboos about public discussion of race in the United States, and were honest and frank with me about their impressions of how white people looked. One told me he thought many white folk looked like aliens, because of narrow noses and thin lips combined with pale skin, and not very attractive. I remember laughing my head off, because they were right. I'd never thought about it before. These perceptions are entirely self-generated by humans.)
3. Scientists say that the human race, in spite of the outward difference in colors and races have amazingly little genetic variation than, say, breeds of dogs. Was this intentional or were there other breeds of humans which were created but gradually became extinct?
C: No extinction; the remarkable similarities in human genetics is the result of the creation process. Humans have not evolved genetically, just realized outward differences inherent in the DNA structure.
4. Is the "migration out of Africa" theory of humans wrong?
5. When genetic modification was done, did the ETs limit the intellectual ability of the human race so that they don't become too intelligent? Did they limit the telepathic ability, maximum age of survival and other characteristics as compared to their own?
C: No mental limitations were structurally installed. Telepathic ability was also unaffected, humans have learned speech and writing and steadily set aside telepathic ability, which is a latent talent every human retains if does not use. Maximum ages were also not changed, all physical beings have a limit to life spans. No changes were made to humanoid creations in this regard.
6. The red haired people in Ireland ...where did they come from. Was their hair a result of natural mutation or gene from a different ET species? Similar things are said about people with negative Rh factor... that was a result of alien gene too?
C: Red hair is simply an inherent genetic characteristic, which came from the hybridization upgrades. It was not intentionally installed, but came along with the package of DNA contributions from the dozen or so races which offered a portion or component. Humans have studied the randomly occurring combinations of genes which can be carried by a human and passed along, even if not manifesting in the appearance of the carrier. There is no guarantee offspring will resemble their biological parents or grandparents, this is an effect and result of the hybridization process of including DNA from a dozen or more races.
Bear in mind always, appearance and preferences are the result of habit among humans. The creation and later upgrades were function based, with little regard for form, shape or appearance.
7. On other ET planets, are there ETs which have evolved from plants but have abilities to move, have intelligence and are self-aware?
8. Music and songs...are these universal among the ETs?
C: Universal among non-physical beings, i.e. among our souls. The existence among physical beings is simply the soul manifesting what it always has, likes and does anyway, where no physical body is involved.
9. Are there ETs and non-physical beings which are involved in the creation / constructions of planets and solar systems etc.?
10. Are there intelligent ETs in the micro level, i.e. so small like we need microscopes to see them or small in size, say, a few inches?
C: No, not that small by comparison to humans. The smallest intelligent physical beings reach a mature size of approximately human children of age three to five. Human dwarfs or midgets are an example of this recessive gene manifesting.
BONUS QUESTION (from the reader also, but unrelated to the previous 10, a sort of football shootout at the end of a match tied after regular and extra time [yes, I have a case of World Cup fever at the moment; it comes around every four years like clockwork])
Q11. Did the Big Bang actually happen? And was there anything before the Big Bang?
C: Yes to both. You have more questions about this? Please offer & ask them.
A reader sends in good questions, based on the recent radio show I did (Church Of Mabus radio) and from reading The Alien Handbook. "Mabus" by the way, is a character mentioned in several of Nostradamus' quatrains.
Q1. You talked about the "Garden of Eden" being in Africa. Can you be more specific about the location?
A: I can't but The Committee can! It took place in what is now the northern portion of the nation of South Africa, the northeastern portion. The Committee says no traces of what occurred there remain, because this was nothing more than a landing spot. The laboratory work was done aboard the visitor alien ET vessel and the newly created humanoid beings introduced to the environment there, nothing more. They were moved, to grow up in several places in what is now named the African continent.
Q2. Was the hybridization done only in one place, or was it in multiple places?
A: The hybridization, or addition to Earth humanoid DNA, was done in the many locations where the recently created humanoid beings - our forerunners and predecessors - were already settled. This was all over Africa.
Q3. You mentioned that humans were created using DNA from species native to earth, "generally simians," mixed with that of the extraterrestrial creators. What do you mean by simians?
A: Primates. Simian = ape, monkey, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, etc.
Q4. Is this to say that we were NOT created from any of the hominin species that are presumed to have evolved and been present on earth over the past 4 million years--from Australopithecus to Homo Habilis to Homo Erectus and so forth?
A: Correct, says The Committee. Humans, the species called homo sapiens in biology or anthropology, are not evolved or descended from animal species which existed on Earth before approximately one thousand centuries ago. Homo habilis and homo erectus are these first humanoids. Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal are other modern human names for them.
Q5. And can you say more about the creators themselves, or is that not permitted?
A: Of course it's permitted! What are the questions?
Q6: From what you've said about the physical similarities between humans and Pleiadians, I would guess we have some of their DNA in us; but what other races contributed to the mixture?
A: You ask difficult, good questions! The answer revolves around what names we humans want to give to those races, about which we know little, but which IS well known by current human civilizations - specifically leadership - from direct contact with them, is concealed. Hidden, covered up and kept secret. In other words, We The People are lied to.
That said, the civilizations from the planets which revolve around the stars we have named Canopus, Arcturus, Sirius and the Pleiades cluster are the main "culprits" or contributors. The remaining ones we have no names for, they are not the "A" team or front line observers, protectors and custodians of Earth. They are from our star cluster, the immediate area out to about 250 light years surrounding Earth, all members of the regional coalition, conference or federation.
Q7. Can you be specific about the races, and can you be more specific about the actual genetic modifications? What physical, mental, and emotional traits did they seek to engineer in humans?
A: Yes, The Committee can. Changes to skull shape, brain size and nervous system and to include the adaptability to the wide variety of Earth climates and environments. This involves the ability for hair, skin, features and size to adapt to the environments. Tall for flat lands, shorter for mountainous, darker skin for more sun, etc.
Q8. I'm confused about the Roswell [New Mexico, USA] incident. If it didn't happen in 1947, but earlier, as you say, then in what year (and where) did it occur, exactly?
A: We've been told 1947 because revelation during the Second World War would have nearly instantly set off panic of an enemy attack. The Committee says, late 1930s in the reported location. They're not giving me a specific year, they say we will enjoy opening that gift ourselves as we open the hidden files humans are told do not exist.
Q9: Does this mean that an authority like Philip J. Corso is wrong, or lying, in his book? What's the deal here?
A: He's not lying, simply incorrect because he didn't know. He did not witness the crash, he was told about it later.
Q10. There's a fascinating chapter in The Alien Handbook about what ETs do in their spare time on their home planets, and you mention that one activity is creating and reading/consuming literature. How is this literature composed?
A: The same way we do it, with their - or our - imaginations.
Q11. Does it take different forms, and what kind?
A: Yes, video novels are common. What we call movies, but they are a combination of written and visual and also telepathic components. Remember, our alien ET cousins are telepathic communicators.
Q12. Are there various genres, and what kinds?
A: Yes, the same as on Earth. The content contains knowledge and events we cannot imagine, but the patterns are similar or equivalent.
Q 13. How, and by whom, is it consumed or appreciated?
A: Everyone who wants to.
Q14: Is it "taught" in "schools"?
A: Yes, very much so and more than on Earth. Most humans do not consume literature. In alien ET races - among the 1%ers who have interstellar travel ability - more than half the population is a regular consumer.
Q15. Is it immediately understandable to other ETs, or is it "translated" into other languages?
A: Yes, there are common written numeric codes which have the role of written language on Earth. These are numeric combinations and keys, recognized by everyone who learns them and the symbols. On Earth we use a wide variety of characters, symbols and letters (Cyrillic, Greek, Chinese, Thai, Hindi to name just a few examples) and this has been refined into a common written code used by interstellar capable civilizations, where necessary.
Q16. Is there anything like a galactic or universal "canon" of ET literature?
A: Yes. It's the interplanetary version of a library.
Q17. What's the most "important" or widely-known piece of literature out there in the universe?
A: There is no single work which fits this description. Importance is entirely dependent upon context.
Q18. Does it have a title?
A: Yes, many works have titles, but not all, unlike human written works.
Q19. If so, what would it be in English?
A: Obviously, not applicable.
Q20. How does literature created by humans fit into this picture?
A: It is included, even though we have no idea of this.
Q21. Do extraterrestrials take pleasure in eating food, or do they simply "digest nutrients" for the sake of sustaining their bodies?
A: Yes, the pleasure is mostly in the taste and aroma, not so much the chewing and swallowing. Just as we enjoy tea far differently than a bowl of thick stew.
Q22. What foods comprise a typical diet among the Pleiadians (let's say "the Nordics"), for example?
A: There is no typical diets, just as on Earth with humans. (Based on what most Americans consume, I do not eat a typical diet, not even close.)
Q23. What is Zebulon's favorite, or least favorite food, from his home planet?
A: He isn't around to answer that, at the moment.
Q24. Do extraterrestrials (let's say the Nordics) enjoy sex the way humans do?
A: There is no such race or civilization as "the Nordics", this is a human projection of what some resemble. In just the Pleiades cluster there are many planets revolving around the several stars and many "people" living on each, and many different types and variations. Just as among humans.
Most civilizations do not reproduce the way humans do, so the races is different and enjoyment cannot be compared between them. Just as we cannot say if this is the same for most Earth animals, who generally dedicate less time to reproduction or even courtship. The difference with humans is emotion and expression, and this is heightened quite a bit among many ET civilizations. This is a very generalized statement because there are many with vast social, cultural and biological differences.
Q25. In the same chapter about extraterrestrial societies on home planets, you write about force fields that protect "urban" areas from certain "predator" species. What kinds of predators live on those planets (or that specific planet that you mention)? What do they look like?
A: Many types, this is so broad it cannot be answered here. Even if you chose one specific planet and civilization, there would be many, just like Earth. Lions, tigers, house cats, coyotes, snakes, foxes, owls, crocodiles and kimodo dragons are just a few widely different Earth examples. Other planets have these broad variations also.
The force fields are electromagnetic barriers, which disrupt the chemical compounds or bodily components in the bodies of specific creatures, but do not affect others with different chemicals or amounts. These barriers can be used to repel with no effect or than annoyance, or if turned to high enough intensity, they can kill quite rapidly.
Q26. What do they eat, and what does their typical "prey" look like?
A: This is too broad to be properly answered, even in a book.
Q27. Are they similar to earth species?
A: Some, but few.
Q28. Are any of the animal species on alien home planets actually related to species on earth via "seeding," and if so, could you give 1-3 examples?
A: Yes, and examples of Earth or elsewhere? Look around you, nearly everything alive on Earth is evolved from and a descendant of something planted or seeded here.
I understand that much information about the history of alien civilizations on home planets is not to be revealed at this time--as you've written in the book--but I'm just probing to see what we can learn right now from our super-awesome galactic cousins.
Which cousins? There are many with enormous variations and differences. It's not that it shouldn't be revealed, it is vast, potentially confusing, often difficult to compare and…..essentially irrelevant.
Veteran readers of TheAmendment.net could probably answer these questions (in bold color) as well as The Committee does here. Nevertheless, Gabrianna, Herman and Matthew do so anyway.
Says & asks a reader:
The interview with Michael from yesterday was intriguing. But it does spark some old questions that have been up my mind for a long time:
I. SPIRITUAL BEINGS
a) The Archangel Michael is an entity from Middle Eastern mythology.
Not quite; ArchAngel Michael is a human perception from Middle Eastern mythology.
What "he" really is, a spirit or energy being in Heaven.
How humans choose to name and see "him" is a human choice.
Why does the description of a religious character happen to match to a spirit?
It - the religious figure description - comes from the spirit. Originates from the spirit.
Did the spirit calling itself "Michael" to humans really always exist in this form and humans like Mary and Muhammad channeling this entity were simply right about its existence?
Yes to both.
If so, what about other ghostly figures from religions?
There are many.
Humans make errors so under the premise of this question, are there any spirits who were claimed to exist but who actually don't?
If somebody were to make up a religion and invented a being called "Rhazmu", then this spirit doesn't really exist because it was made up. The Flying Spaghetti Monster isn't a thing ... or is it?
We laugh out loud and order spaghetti, with meatballs. Anything imagined, exists. How much it exists independently or in the human imagination or solely inside the human thought, are different things.
b) As an alternative, am I correct to assume that those religious entities are rather spirits who like to pursue a role shaped by human minds - not shaped by human minds, but in agreement with those preferred human perceptions, as long as there is no distortion or deception - in order to engage with religious people in a way they can accept and cherish?
Yes, precisely. There is little to be gained and more to be lost, by upending or upsetting the established sets of beliefs.
I favor this explanation to be more realistic as many religious entities are *clearly* shifting according to the superstitions of humans.
Clearly to whomever looks. Not clearly to others. Clarity is a function of agreement and acceptance.
II. FREQUENCIES AND DIMENSIONS
a) This one is important to me. The Committee has categorized reality into three general "dimensions", all of them encompassing three subdimensions. Until now, I used to think of the dimension-continuum as a spectrum comparable to light or sound frequencies: We can't visually perceive ultraviolet (higher "dimension") nor infrared (lower "dimension") and sounds can also be too high-frequent or low-frequent for us to hear. Does this analogy not hold up?
It is a good one.
It would have amounted to dimensions beyond subdimension nine and below subdimension one which simply are of no interest to us.
Please explain to what you refer as "it" and what you mean by beyond subdimension nine and below subdimension one.
b) From what I could tell, the relevant difference between those "layers of reality" - layers of perception, but rality is also a good word - as I prefer to call the dimensions (a word with too many criss-crossing meanings) is vibration. But what vibrates? The soul?
Yes. Everything vibrates, from atoms and their subatomic particle components up to the largest object you can imagine.
But wouldn't the soul be part of higher layers and higher layers only where also spirits reside?
Yes, however a soul can also be synchronized with and operate a body, and this creates a vibration for the body soul combination.
Maybe the body?
But it was said that we don't physically change as we go through the layers of reality.
Who are "we" and what changes do you mean? That statement is extremely broad, wide and difficult to answer.
So if it really is the soul after all that increases its vibration, does the soul share a seat with our physical selves in the lower layers?
Yes, see above
Whenever people talk about raising one's vibration I just never know what to imagine. It's inconcrete and blurry, urgh.
The vibration is the effect, not the cause. When you raise your vibration, it simply means you employ what YOU believe to be a nobler, benevolent and caring thought. This can be charity, help, or even a noble thought, prayer and wish for a person you were forced to injure or kill in self defense, who attempted to attack and kill you. You can and should defend and protect yourself but you can, may and even should also have benevolent thoughts for that person and his soul. We do not say her soul, for so few human females do this.
c) What are those "parameters" that the layers of reality consist of? Is it the states of matter?
Depth, width and height, simply that.
The atoms of molecules vibrate after all; solid ice has a lower atomic frequency compared to water which in turn as a liquid possesses a lower frequency than gas. Inducing energy to the molecule makes the atoms break up from each other, meaning that water vapor has higher energy levels - faster vibration is a better description, but you are correct - than ice. Something else? Do the states of matter belong to an entirely different spectrum? "Clear as mud" indeed.
No. It is the same spectrum. Science and spirituality are the same thing.
d) What are those "other physical beings" who occupy the fourth to sixth subdimension?
Mostly alien extraterrestrials, from the point-of-view of humans. Specifically the visitors who travel to Earth.
I assume it's not an everyday creature like a squirrel, right? More like the Bigfoot species, hm? Shouldn't those guys be non-physical to our layer of reality given that we can't interact unless the creature intentionally lowers the frequency of its body to bleed into layer number one?
In turn, if a human wanted to visit the second layer shouldn't he/she need to raise the frequency of its body for travel?
Humans cannot do this, it is a condition of the human body existence and an accepted limit to the process of incarnation. Souls who choose to do what you have done, accept this. In fact, seek it. It is one of the great attractions of Earth human incarnation. To live constrained, temporarily but under the very solid illusion that the constraint is permanent, this is a great attraction. It is a great attraction to hike up a tall mountain, knowing the air will be thinner and the challenge this will pose for the human body. There is nothing the human can do, if the climb is chosen. It can be avoided, of course, and most souls avoid incarnation with this knowledge and understanding. You who have incarnated did not come on an uninformed whim, ignorant of what would be encountered. You did it with full, compete knowledge and eager anticipation.
Wouldn't that turn a solid body into a liquid, then a gas, then plasma, then ... ? You can tell, dear Patrick and the Committee, that I don't know how to make this work for me.
No, you will not convert physically into matter in a different state, while you remain alive. It does not need to be made to work, it occurs automatically.
e) In the dimension occupied by Bigfoots among other creatures, there should exist plants different from ours, yes? Shouldn't the soil, the mountains and valleys, the rivers and oceans and pretty much everything also be different? I find it strange to dig a hole in my backyard and expect it to appear in the second layer of reality where Bigfoots live. Wouldn't that mean they live on an entirely different planet, in a different universe altogether?
Yes, there are many things in higher dimensions that do not exist in these. They do not seem different, because the differences are relative. Days which are three times longer on another planet, which required three Earth rotations to achieve one, will seem no longer or shorter to you, once you enter such an environment.
f) If I had two ghosts hovering above each side of my shoulders, one a positive spirit and the other one a negative demon-like entity, do they both occupy a higher layer of reality compared to me...
- yes -
...or is it possible that a negative entity occupies a layer *below* mine...
- no -
...and has raised its frequency to interact with me while the positive spirit had to lower its vibration?
If they both are beyond my layer of reality, wouldn't the negative entity be more likely to manifest a body I can touch?
Oof, that was a lot of questions at once but not nearly as many as I intended. There was and is more to come. Prepare for the worst. ;)
Or best. Be well and do return.
Much ado about nothing. I didn't know until afterwards, it would be possible to simply click the link for the re-play. Click on and off it goes. An hour and 45 minutes.
A reader asks The Committee great questions, and I thought the readership (all of y'all) would enjoy these anonymous Qs & As.
Q1. How detailed is the Committee’s knowledge of human history, generally? How did they obtain, or how do they access this knowledge?
A: More detailed than human knowledge, which you should study in detail first, then offer a specific question about a gap you encounter, which has not been sufficiently addressed by human knowledge and study of human history.
In this realm, of energetic beings without physical bodies, knowledge is not obtained, not stored or withheld. It is available to all souls aware and interested in the information.
2. Can the Committee share any information about their own evolutionary history? Specifically: when and where did they originate? are there other intelligent life forms on their home planets? what kinds? can they describe the stages of their own spiritual evolution? When did they develop space/time travel technology? Were they themselves created by other extraterrestrial beings?
A: Yes, this information we can share. We are not evolved. We are. Simply. We originated along with you and all souls, at the center of existence, to which we still belong. We are not tethered to a planet, and neither are you. Your body is a temporary thing on one of billions of planets, no more. There is but one stage to spiritual growth, it is called expansion. It occurs continuously, to all souls. No evolution happens. We have never developed space or time travel technology, we could always do it automatically, as you can. There is no time for us - it does not exist away from Earth - and it is only a temporary condition of Earth surface existence, and remains an illusion overall. We are not extraterrestrial physical beings.
3. What does the Committee know, if anything, about _____ location? Does that location have unique powers, as occultists have claimed?
A: What is your question? Unique powers depends entirely on your interpretation or understanding of unique. Define it as part of your specific question.
4. What does the Committee know, if anything, about the (history and future of the) _______ nations & culture ?
A: What gap in the already existing human knowledge do you wish filled, that cannot be learned from study of that information?
5. What does the Committee know, if anything, about the Hogwarts' God Voldemort? (That was a joke from The Committee folks, but the question is real; Harry Potter was inserted at The Committee's urging & suggestion) I may have some follow-up questions on this matter.
A: What gap in the already existing human knowledge do you wish filled, that cannot be learned from study of that information?
6. Are there any famous historical figures who were extraterrestrials, or children of extraterrestrials? Any ancient ____ figures? Any _____ ?
A: Yes, nearly all humans have lived as a physical being on another planet, as what you consider an extraterrestrial alien.
7. Approximately how many extraterrestrials are there within a 250,000-mile radius of the earth right now?
A: This cannot be answered, there is no "right now" because that assumes time on Earth applies off Earth. Visitors come and go constantly, continuously and regularly. A slice of Earth time would give a wildly inaccurate description, because this radius or distance is very small. Alien ET visitors to Earth are throughout the solar system or group of planets orbiting your sun.
8. I do not think that I have any special psychic abilities (aside, perhaps, from a strong intuitive sense). Are there any tactics/habits/practices I can do to clear up any buffering in communication with my higher self, or to make contact with higher beings?
A: Yes you have, as do all humans. Buffering in communication? It is to be laughed at this phrase, it is very good, an excellent example of human misunderstanding. Excellent, well said. The biggest step is believe you have the ability to communicate telepathically. Then, begin doing it. You already transmit, unaware are you of this. Simply be aware that when you think, you transmit. Then, begin listening to your thoughts. You have them, so listen to them also. Some are yours, generated by you and some are incoming. Listen closely with your mind. The differences will emerge.
9. I have heard elsewhere, from other well-known mediums, that not all extraterrestrial races have a benevolent concern for us, though some certainly do. Marshall Vian Summers, for example, has stressed the danger of allying with certain races that would seek to subordinate our species and our planet to some kind of galactic “collective.” Can the Committee comment on that?
A: Correct, however alien extraterrestrials visiting Earth are most benevolent. Malevolents are not permitted. There is zero risk of alien trouble for humans, who themselves are alien extraterrestrials, aboard Earth for one hundred thousand laps around the central star, so far.
A reader says & asks:
Just heard on the news today that President Trump wants to add a 6th branch to the military called the Space Force. Holy Cow. (For readers outside the USA, there are five Armed Forces; Coast Guard, Navy, Army, Air Force and Marine Corps.)
Says The Committee:
1) The perception of threats to surface nations of Earth, from the immediate orbit above and around Earth. This is the cause, understood and developed for decades. The USA is as much a target as targeter, and the development of flying and military offensive capability was the same a century ago. Many of you will remember the USA's mention of Star Wars during the presidency of Ronald Reagan; such was an example.
3) A natural development, they have watched and listened, observed and considered this as long as humans have pursued the idea of orbiting weaponry.
4) Of course, alien extraterrestrials will not interfere in human affairs. This has no effect upon them. They will observe with keen interest, even fascination, as they have all significant and even no-so-significant human events and developments.
5) The mission is prevent attacks from space by threatening attacks from space, both upon surface targets and also adversarial weapon satellites and near spacecraft, spacecraft orbiting below the radiation areas.
To introduce this topic, I refer to a recently posted video by Kevin Moore, of The Moore Show; link to the video just below. As many of you might remember, Mr. Moore interviewed me and included that on his channel, about 2 months ago (almost 11.4 thousand views so far).
In the below video, Kevin interviews Phil Corso, Jr. the now retired son former US Army officer Col. Phillip J. Corso who oversaw the reverse engineering efforts of devices and technologies recovered from crashed alien ET ships. In this 1 hour and 20 minute video (a bit long, like asking you to watch a movie) both inter- viewer & viewee cover a lot of ground BUT ..... the discussion of time really grabbed my attention. You can fast forward to 15:10 and listen until about 21:00 to get the idea. (The entire video pays handsome dividends for "time" invested.)
The Committee expands by answering my questions below.
Reader Linda posted in the last entry's comments, the link to this YooToob video. Repeated here in case it gets lost in the comments. This was a 3 for 1, three firsts:
Not really; Mr. Armstrong doesn't appear. Q&A with The Committee, based on the last session.