This resonates extremely powerfully. I though am left with the question as to whether or not those interests and organizations which eliminated JFK and rfk are still valid and viable concerns, and if another such political interest might be a likely victim.
"No and no, they have been replaced", says The Committee, "however the risk remains, if not to the same degree.The greater change took place during the presidency of Ronald Reagan, the peak approached, passed and left behind during that segment of human time. The concerns which led to the assassination of Kennedy entered a decline and have since faded to the point of being immaterial. New concerns have arisen, but less acute."
It is my understanding that after we croak it ,there is indeed a "place" library hall type where anyone can go and learn The Truth about lots of things like this that occurred during their incarnation , im sure as shit hoping thats correct, cuz im moving in when i get there ! ! 😊😊
"This place exists", says The Committee "but you do not have to go there physically, although this is optional and often done. Your current, human life based ideas, impressions, curiosities and reactions to many things which are a part of or memory of this life, will be different, some vastly different. Some mysteries will interest you, however less. Other mysteries will draw your attention, of which you are now barely aware and almost completely disinterested but for the bare awareness you have. Mostly the attraction to this information will be to compare it to what incomplete information is available to humans and then to study human reaction to the mystery, the intrigue and the search for missing pieces."
One of our best politicians, Aldo Moro, was killed by order of USA control groups.
We overcame this, so should you.
Be at peace with your ghosts
And I forgot to mention the other 5 people, his bodyguards, who were also killed during his kidnap
Moro was kidnapped and killed by the Red Brigades...and they were USA controlled groups? I do not agree.
I barely remembered that name and none of the details, so I looked him up. This makes sense that I forgot, I was just finishing high school at the time.
I asked The Committee if there was any influence, involvement, control or participation by people from the USA, in the kidnapping, murders and death of the Italian Prime Minister.
"No" they reply.
Red brigades kidnapped him, but the order to kidnap and (later) kill him came from USA.
This killing was ordered on account of concern among control groups in USA about the politics pursued by Moro, seen as too close to PCI (and so URSS).
USA has never hold itself to exert control on the peripherical countries, with whatever mens deemed appropriate. There is a long record track on this issue, and it is a well established matter.
I'have personally no issue with this, I understand that a geopolitical force like USA (and URSS) and many like them, use this type of manners routinely to mantain their positions.
The only thing that could be harmed, there, is the self-esteem of some citizens, that put too much praise on the image of their country.
Sure, there are geopolitical powers that could be considered better than others in manning different problems, but when we go to power, and power preservation, they all act very like the same.
Moro was even blatantly menaced by Kissinger himself.
But, as said, this is history of the past and, like Kennedy, no more influencial.
Seems to me that governments and their bloated structures cause many if not most of the ills of our challenging world. The tale of JFK strikes me as but another example. All the world's a stage. JFK knew his role and knew his fate. He played his part well.
In other words, "we" cause many if not most of the ills of our challenging world.
Sorry to go off topic but otherwise I'll forget! I've reached that age! I'm sure many of us will be familiar with the works of Michael Newton, in particular his books Journey of the Soul and Destiny of the Soul. These were the first books that really opened my eyes and made complete sense as I tried to understand what the hell I was doing here.
Anyway, now that Newton has left this plane, I was thinking he would be an amazing 'afterlife' interviewee.
Yes Alex good idea , I loved those books and read them many times and still have them , way back when I was a newbie and flabbergasted and so intrigued ( still am ) at this kind of material , such fun , nice man and author
Alex if you want Patrick to interview Michael Newton he will want questions. I just started to read Journey of Souls, great book.
Did you go solo at the time of your transition?
If you did, please explain why and how it happens?
Do you still view destructive impulse of emotional disorder inhibiting soul development?
Was the death of John F Kennedy Jr in 1999 in the airplane crash foul-play as well?
The Committee says "No."
Thank you for those responses.
As to “elements not inside and not outside the halls of power in the United States”, Robert Mueller, fits that description perfectly, does he not? He was appointed into his position to investigate trump and Russian collusion without any supervision or over-sight -no checks and balances. How long before the “mueller investigation” comes to an end?
Thanks in advance
I don't see Mueller fitting the description at all and there certainly are obstacles to such a "special counsel's" authority. He can be fired.
He's very obvious and u$ing resource$ from the Justice Department; that's much too transparent to come anywhere close to being something not quite inside but not outside government. The role is very much inside.
So if I've got this straight ...
Once upon a Time, the once believed all powerful Wizard of Ozwald, turned out to be just a regular flawed guy, when the curtain was pulled back and revealed the truth about him.
Then His ticket "home" (but not to Kansas) was punched by a guy in Jack Ruby Red Slippers.
All of the while, the seekers who have been traveling down the Yellow Brick Road (or wormhole) of historical speculation, can rest easy once they realize that the answers that they seek, could always be found within themselves, if they just "shifted" the focus of their attention & thus perception.
And we all lived happily ever after.
Thank you Patrick and TC for some very Illuminati-ing information.
Wait!!! So THAT's is who's been hiding behind the curtain all along!!!
Very good. It seems you've got it as straight as it's ever going to be!
But he sure as hell killed Officer JD Tippit.
This act had a witness.
Why murder Tippit if he had done nothing associated with JFK?
The Committee says "Oswald did not murder Tippit. That killing was part of the frame up. The witness saw an impersonator."
There's a guy called "James Files" who claims to be one who fired the fatal shot from the grassy knoll. His story certainly sounds very plausible. https://youtu.be/pPuj5xOKcEw
On a human level, everyone loves a whodunnit! Even 129 years after Jack the Ripper, we still love to speculate about who really did it.
Kennedy was caught in a crossfire, none of the several shooters can know if he fired the fatal one, although it was most likely the slug which separated a large portion of the skull just above the forehead.
So, after all the investigations, does the FBI, CIA or other government entity know what really happened that day in Dallas? Are the perpetrators and their participants the only ones who know? How do/did they manage to change history and escape detection so well?
And what about MLK...do we have the real story on his assignation?
1) So, after all the investigations, does the FBI, CIA or other government entity know what really happened that day in Dallas?
2) Are the perpetrators and their participants the only ones who know?
3) How do/did they manage to change history and escape detection so well?
4) And what about MLK...do we have the real story on his assignation?
Says The Committee:
1. Overall, yes however they do not have names of the actors.
2. Yes, to the last detail. Knew is a better word, in human terms, since they have died.
3. They planned their escape and stuck to the plan.
4. (This question asks, is the account of Martin Luther King's assassination accurate, does it represent the event more or less correctly?) No, there are elements to the assassination behind the scenes, influences and motivation which have never come to light. These interests disguised their steps very well and are unlikely to be found out in human required terms.
Condolences Pat for Texas peoples, its appears another sad incident..
Best to avoid news if possible. It's rarely uplifting.
Of course it's possible, however being an ostrich, hermit or both isn't a good method of survival, development or progress.
I hope I don't know any of the victims.
LOL with John Travolta and the Saturday Night Fever dance. Last night they had the recent BeeGees tribute concert on TV with recent singers singing the BeeGees Iconic songs.
Barry Gibb and I have a bit in comment with having no siblings now..
What is everyone's favourite BeeGee song. Mine is "How deep is your Love"
"How can you mend a broken heart".
Awww did you have a teenage broken heart
"Run To Me"
@Lorri.. Not sure If I know that title of that one.. Must look it up
@Denis... oohh oooh ooh stayin alive...
You Should Be Dancing
@Alex.... Yeah :-)
ooopt typo above bit in common, not comment ;-)
Great memories that song brings forth, thank you Susan.
Two of my favorites, since I was a pre-teen, back at ya:
Ahhh can't beat Michael and Jackson 5.
My teenage years in the 80's was pretty much ALL George Michael music. (sorry MJ)
This song will be celebrated completely on Christmas Day, the day GM died
Re Bee Gees, this is a tad naughty, but we were silly teenage boys at the time , however still makes me laugh if night fever comes on as we would sing "nice beaver" a la, lesley nielson / prisilla presley gag, the words just fit perfectly, I, I 😅😅
Steve, go and stand in the corner. Do not pass GO. Do not collect $200. ;)
Well this is currently making the rounds on Youtube that Jackie Kennedy herself shot her own husband - https://youtu.be/U8ZK44DNYKw
That surely cannot be true. It's my understanding from reading channeled accounts that the mastermind was none other than RFK, in cahoots with LBJ. What Shakespeare would have done with a story like this! It would have been his greatest and most intriguing work.
LBJ was an interesting character and there were always mubblings that he had something to do with the assignation but that line of thought always seemed far fetched and he was another scapegoat for the real culprits.
Johnson wasn't a fair player (there's still talk of ballot boxes at the bottom of a lake in south Texas) but murder...? It just doesn't seem to fit.
Who is spreading that nonsense? Are they literally insane?
I was five years old when he was killed.
Years later, I saw the assassination photos in LIFE Magazine which my mother had saved. They had a sequence of motorcade photos that showed JFK putting his hand up to his throat after a bullet entered. Then he was shot again, and there is a sequence of photos of Jackie Kennedy climbing onto the back of the car to retrieve part of her husband's skull after he was shot. She grabbed it and scrambled back into the seat and tried to hold it onto his head.
I remember being so impressed by her quick thinking.
These photos were highly publicized at the time and long after. I have to assume that it's a young person putting forth this stupid idea. Jackie even refused to change out of her blood-spattered suit because she wanted the public to see what they'd done to him.
By "they", I mean the killers.
Lorri have you watched the video link I shared? It’s very compelling. She had motive e.g. his infidelity and her desire to be with Onassis.
By the way, for another debate which is part of The Mandela Effect is how many occupants were in the car at the time of the shooting?
Mike, I don't even know what to say. How anyone could entertain the idea that Jackie Kennedy shot her own husband while driving in a motorcade surrounded by crowds of people, photographers, and motion picture cameras . . . is beyond me.
This is entering Twilight Zone territory.
Mike, I watched the video. The first video he shows looks totally different (maybe doctored) than the clearer one filmed from the front. You can clearly see there is nothing in Jackie Kennedy's hands in the second one.
The guy is incoherent and rambling, and changes the subject every other minute. Nothing makes sense. I think he suffers from insanity.
Back to the Bee Gee for a moment, did you know that if you ever want to give heart pumps to someone you are attempting to resuscitate and forget the timing, then remember and sing along to Stayin Alive chorus, as it is the correct same timing / tempo required for heart pump! ! 😀
if John Travolta keeps dancing at the tempo he's been going at for the past few days, someone will need to resuscitate him.
No wonder he was so slim back then.
He's been sailing along ever since.
It would be interesting to hear from the late Lucien Sarti about his role in the JFK tale.
Patrick, having a public figure assassinated seems like a lot of effort. Wouldn't it be easier to arrange for a fatal car accident, or fall, or some other accident?
Did the same "group" (or groups) assassinate any other famous people?
Also, was the attempted assassination of Reagan a one man job or is there much more to the story.
This makes me start to wonder if Anwar Sadat, John Lennon, Jimmie Dean, or Diana were also victims of such a group.
Thank you for all the information. My brain is getting plenty of exercise.
I don't think a car bomb would be easier. Access to the vehicle is extremely difficult. Fatal accident? Just as challenging.
Says The Committee:
Yes, the same "group" assassinated JFK's younger brother, Robert Kennedy, as mentioned above.
Ronald Reagan's attempted assassination was a one-man job.
Anwar Sadat and Diana Spencer were victims of group plots. Lennon was not and Jimmy Dean was not assassinated. (I assume you mean country music star and sausage company Jimmy Dean).
Hi Patrick I was just wondering if this genius boy in Russia who's allegedly lived on mars is this for real or just a hoax thanks Patrick and tc
"No human has lived on Mars", says The Committee "although a few have been taken there to visit. very few, Not this Russian boy, who is making reference to another lifetime, what humans would call a past life.Your soul can visit anytime you desire, as you sleep. You will likely not remember it, even if you ask yourself to make your awake self recall the trip."
Ok thanks Patrick and tc so would this be more of a new wave of humans who are able to share past life experiences or maybe I misread somewhere that as children start to reincarnated they will be able to share past life experience anyway thanks again Patrick and tc
"No", says The Committee. "there is no such thing as a 'new wave of humans'. The ability to 'share' or have knowledge of a 'past life' experience already exists in you, and this discussion must include future lives, to be valid. When a discussion of past lives does not simultaneously include future lives, the discussion, is incomplete, insifucient and thus flawed.
We know this statement will run counter to many beliefs and ideas, and could likely offend the true believer in past lives as truly past.
Your lives are simultaneous, and you plan them all, future and past, just as the current, 'in-process' one unfolds.
If the current life and others could be intermixed, compared and altered at will, with & because of that information, then life on Earth would not be worth pursuing as it is now lived, and would not be attempted or undertaken.
Our general suggestion, not only to you our friend Scott, but to all who might read these words, is: drop the view of a past life, just as you never consider a future life. Live THIS life. It is not a continuance of another life begun, lived and finished along a linear sequence of time which precedes your current place. It is not the past, and has little meaning to your current life. Even if your life, today and now, contains something you chose to continue developing which was also a theme, subject or component of another life, which was artificially placed along the Earth illusion of sequential time, it only figures into your life because you choose to place it there. There is no past life influence, only your choice to more thoroughly develop something another incarnation contains."
Years ago I woke up in the morning having known that I knew all the answers to the Universe, Creation, Mysteries, Science etc absolutely everything!. It was the most fantastic feeling . The only problem was that I couldn't hang on to it. It disintegrated the more I became awake. I was left with the feeling for days but could not remember what it is that I knew.
Maybe a little precursor to dementia.
Okay so here are my questions.
1) When the soul renters the body from sleep what medically actually happens to the brain. Is the density of the physical body involved
2) For people who can remember eg NDE is their brain now altered in some way.
3) Is part of the ascension/shift our ability to choose to remember and thus move towards more harmony and peace.
@Janis: Says The Committee:
1) Nothing changes. What happens mechanically to car at the moment a human sits in the driver's seat?
3) Remember dreams? Knowledge? Something else? What you have chosen to forget in this life? The application of what is re-, dis- and uncovered, is The Shift.
Like I said i thought I read somewhere either here or ce that it was going to be more common in generations to share past life experience anyway thanks again Patrick and my new or is that my old friends tc lmao
When future life experience is shared, past life experience will also be.