Fascinating stuff as usual!!
You & TC impress me "Yeti" again.
What about all the sightings? On vacation in Santa Cruz they have a Bigfoot museum that has castings of Bigfoot footprints. They also have a map that shows were people have seen bigfoot. Lots of thumbtacks. Is this real or not?
Yes, many of the sightings are bona fide.
Dear Patrick & C. I have a consideration concerning this sentence:
"They are the natural species to Earth, evolved over eons of time before humans were created. "
So, here we have an intelligient species, the "True terrestrials" I would say, that developed a sort of "civilization" (a loose one, based on nomadic families) that utterly removes from its components a thing like technology. I wonder if they have some piece of technology with them, even the simplest ones, like sticks or modelled stones (see paleolitic) to work wood and animal skins (but I suppose they don't even need clothes or shoes, nor fishpoles nor blades to cut... this is embarassing in human terms, we are so unproficient without tools)
I know that most efforts by the SETI program to find alien civilizations signals is based on the assumption that sooner or later, an advanced civlization will develop a technology and a communication system, based on sending/receiving electromagnetic impulses (that is, radio signals)
It seems to me that the vast "space silence" observed till present day could be explained because a of lot of civilizations (barring the ones not developed enough along the thecnology path) have completely avoided technology, and also most civilizations simply switched long time ago to different means to communicate: if I have understood well past infos given by the Committee, telephatic communication is the current universal standard to cover all ranges; also used, are signals that uses portions of electromagnetic field that we still we don't know to exist (consequently, we humans know and use only a restriction of the entire "thing" that light is, and we call this restriction "electromagnetic field").
What I would ask, is: are there civilization near us (say below 150 light years distance from our system) that is currently using radio signals, but the kind that us humans are currently using?
Also, are there detectable radio signals produced by civilizations, currently reaching our planet (even form very far)? If yes, why are we unable to correctly detect and interpre them as intelligient communications?
Thank you in advance, and thank you for the insights
"...signals, but the kind..."
should be changed in
"...signals, of the kind.."
Tools are a symbol of our proficiency.
None of the above. The vast majority of alien ET civilizations communicate across vast distances uing X-ray and Gamma ray waves, not electromagnetic.
We detect X and Gamma rays of course, but we cannot tune in or receive the frequencies used and even if posibble, we would not understand the information.
The Committee tells me, interstellar civilizations use a numerical code as a universal language, and learn to read it much as we read words. We humans wouldn't understand this code, even if it jumped up and rubbed us in the face.
But x and gamma rays are still electromagnetic waves... bound to have the light speed as a limit.
How can be them effectively used as carriers ?
Do the "unknown part of Em" apply?
EM stands for Electro-Magnetic field, just to clarify to other people
Correct however I meant the parts and portions of the EM spectrum used for human telecommunications, such as amplitude or frequency modulation broadcasts, microwaves, and so forth.
We do not and cannot use gamma and x-rays to send radio and TV broadcasts, and we cannot detect (yet) the higher speeds at which EM energy also transmits, far above and in excess of 300,000 km/s, i.e. the speed of light.
So if the Yeti are the natural species to earth and they were here before humans, were we created from them? (I know this is just a shot in the dark, and forgive me if this subject has already been covered...the origin of humans, that is.)
Some DNA was taken from saquatch / yeti, gorillas and chimpanzees. There were no genes borrowed, just the DNA molecular structure, modified so physical characteristics required to thrive in Earth's conditions (atmophere mixture of gases, temperatues, humidity, sunlight, day & night cycles and so forth) would be incorporated. We mostly resemble the alien ETs from which we were created, although the subequent "upgrades" included DNA contributions of about a dozen other ET civilizations. (The Alien Handbook" explains better.)
This was not gene mixture, where a combination of characteristics from both parents or several sources produce offspring resemble a mixture of both.
It was like cloning - a copy - BUT the DNA molecules themselves were changed.
We are most certainly NOT descended from any souce being's DNA, Earth bound or from outer space. Nobody would suggest a steel framed building is the descendant of an iron ore mine.
Awesome answer! This just boggles the mind! Looking forward to learning more in The Alien Handbook--arriving tomorrow!
Scientists say human DNA is 96% similar to chimpanzees.
It's the gene expression that's different between humans and chimps.
EXCERPT: " Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes, the scientists identified some 40 million differences among the three billion DNA molecules, or nucleotides, in each genome.
The vast majority of those differences are not biologically significant, but researchers were able to identify a couple thousand differences that are potentially important to the evolution of the human lineage."
Are TC allowed to elaborate about the Pattison Bluff Creek footage, and refrain from bamboozling us in a sea of ambiguity ?? 😀😀
Has The Committee ever bamboozled anyone in ambiguity? The question seems to suggest:
- This is a concern, based on previous bamboozlements
- There are certain or specific types of answers already in mind.
1. What are the questions?
2. What is the Pattison Bluff Creek?
3. Footage (video) of?
4. Is there a criminal element to it?
Hi Pat, yep I've definitely been bamboozled by ambiguity , but I'm bamboozled by ambiguity by non pyshical being easily, so wouldn't stress that one. Bluff Creek is the most famous piece of supposed bigfoot footage ever . Ide be dumbfounded if anyone who visits here has never seen it. So obvious question is Real genuine , staged, fake, human in a suit ? No criminal context involved to my knowledge ?
Patterson Bluff and I saw it a long time ago, yes indeed. And now, once again.
Says The Committee: "Genuine".
WONDERFUL !!.. Love it!!
I recalled the GAG explained before that we found the remains of dinosaurs, homo erectus, neanderthal, but never the missing link: because there is none. Homo sapiens was created by changing the genes of neanderthal or homo sapiend denisovan.
If the ET miners did not create homo sapiens to be their 'mining tools' to remove 90% of the gold deposit on Earth, the descendants of neanderthals would still roam the Earth. Apparently they still do, in the form of Big Foot, Yeti, etc. They seem highly evolved spiritually, but less advanced in machinery and other physical technology.
Perhaps Big Foot should find an inter-galactic court to sue the ET miners for recovery of their gold deposit and the harm caused by the dumping of an alien species (homo sapiens) in their home planet?
"...Homo sapiens was created by changing the genes of neanderthal.."
Not quite. We were created by mixing DNA from alien ETs and some already exisiting Earth animals, and we have later in the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries come to call one of the first humanoids created, "Neanderthal."
These early humanoids were further modified, adding DNA from about a dozen OTHER ET civilizations, in small and varied amounts. The earlier humanoids, what we now call Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal, then died off and were no more.
BigFoot / Yeti / Sasquatch are NOT descended from the first humanoids.
The idea of an inter-galactic court is informative and touches on the serious assumptions we make today regarding territory, property ownership and control. These things have only recently come to be part of human practice and did not exist before us.
I often wondered if the Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons were the earlier versions of humans TC talked about.
Thank you so much for the clarification on the stage development of humanoid.
So it took some time for the ET miners to genetically engineer a suitable mining animal (as in 'farm animal') to do the digging.
Question: which version of the genetically engineered humanoid was deployed in the gold mine (in South Africa), was it homo sapiens or neanderthal or some other interim model?
About the concept of possession and ownership: at the time, the indigenous animals of Earth had no idea of mining. Even if they were, they would not be able to stop the ET miners from removing mineral from the planet. Today, if we had a suitable spaceship (as in Starship Enterprise) and dispatch Captain Picard to the home planet of the ET miners and remove 90% of the gold deposit there, perhaps the ET miners might think differently about the concept of ownership and possession then.
PS By the time we have the technology to build Starship Enterprise, we probably would also be able to cure male pattern baldness.
@ Stephen: Again, not quite...
"..So it took some time for the ET miners to genetically engineer a suitable mining animal (as in 'farm animal') to do the digging."
The genetically suitable humanoid came about immediately. AFTER the initial mining period was complete, about 3 decades after enough gold was removed, THEN upgrades & adjustments to the DNA and thus human form, were introduced. The purpose was to enhance human homo sapiens' ability to survive and thrive in the Earth environment, without oversight and protection from the ETs who created the first humanoids.
The first ones were the only "version" used in mining. Their remains have been classified as Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal, for example. There were differences among members of this group, just as occur among all humans. (Siblings of the same gender and parents can vary widely.) The ETs who created these humanoids were not attempting to clone, i.e. make exact copies. They were not copying anything, they were mixing physical traits to best achieve their purpose.
The way inherited characteristics are passed through from parent to offspring, was not altered. The objective was create a humanoid form similar to themselves BUT which could thrive in the combination of atmospheric gases, temperatures, sunlight, humidity, available nutrients and sustenance, with resistance to microbes, viruses, disease etc. factors which DID affect the alien ETs.
It was not just digging, in fact very little. It was carrying the extracted ore out of the mines and pits the alien ET miners opened using their highly advanced technology. The process was done with as little environmental invasion as possible, in fact almost none. The alien ETs were able to dislodge the ore also, with little need for physical labor and they were also able to refine it. They simply could not remove it from the mines and shafts without engaging in open pit mining and destruction of vast areas of the surface. (Strip mining of coal?) This information comes from The Committee and effectively, you're asking about the next book!
Ownership and possession are a fluid, moving concept. Humans generally have fixed ideas, but these are a recent development. Gorillas, elephants, dolphins and birds see things somewhat differently.
Nobody really owns land anyway. Stop paying royal tributes on it. Oooops, forgot to use the PC name...taxes.
By the time we can cure baldness, nobody will care.
Dear Patrick & C.
Just one question about this gold mining: why it is so valuable to the Aliens, to make them engage in all this work?
We just use gold for fashion, and very little to buld electronic circuitry and dental care... it seems that this element has still a lot of undiscovered properties to show...
The GAG once commented that gold dust is sprinkled in the atmosphere (of ET's home planet) to stabilise climate. Apparently we could also do so on this planet (not that we have much gold left to do that).
I find it interesting that with all the technology they had, they could not generate enough energy to split the atom and re-combine to make gold, and chose to wander around in space looking at far away planets for gold.
@Stephen, thank you. It feels so true.
Marbles. Marbles can be there calling card. Xxx