Very clear, clean, elegant, refined - I like AAM , how universally loving & perfect for the role. Great q’s - leaves no doubt re : pregnancy claims but playing Cupid perfectly welcome- Yes please AAM , help me along💎💚. Thank you whoever posted the q’s.
Radio show was exciting as you rolled & flowed into & responded to q’s. The other presenters expresses very clear events. I’ve changed again from within because of generous sharing from Patrick et al. Wondrous.Thank you.
AAM answer re: time & dimension - ABSOLUTELY clear & workable , only took 1-2 readings . Such a fantastic personable Soulbeing. 🤟
I agree with Jumpjet Harriet's comments about AAM's succinct and oh so wonderful answers. Those questions regarding the impregnation/marriage of and with human women was also wondered at. It pushed my beliefs a tad! It makes me wonder how much we can trust these mediums who publish these messages and their other messages and channelings. It requires a good deal of distinction and discernment. What a subject though! It has great entertainment value!
No medium or psychic is 100% accurate, however there are mistakes and there are MISTAKES.
And there are charlatans. Charlatans tend to make big honking MISTAKES.
Pregnancy via archangels . . . that's a new one for me.
I don't understand what purpose it would serve.
I very much understand how any why a women would get wrapped up in the notion of a Romance/ Marriage/Impregnation with AAM, then run with the idea and then Poof, before you know it someone says "Apparently there's this medium whos says that blah, blah, blah ! And here we are ! Nice interview Pat, as usual.😊
@Steve,,in what way did you understand?
Your post, which I don’t understand led me to ask why I wrote I believed those women. It definitely was a remarkable few moments of wonder & I did believe in the claim of impregnation as stated by someone else, well , similar to hybridisation in past re : human with ET genes .i’ve listened/watched/read many spiritual postings saying anything is possible. I’m not one of those women with notions of Romance/Wife of / Impregnation by AAM. I accept AAM’s replies as a seeker. Goodness knows what those women will think/feel if they read AAM’s reply of no wives or impregnation by AA . Thats not my journey & I can leave it be.
@Jumpjet Harriet. Yes, I find it quite amusing with all these women who feel they are his wife, or twin or Archangel Faith his counterpart or part of him, his higher self etc or even his energy incarnated. I actually know quite a few ladies who believe all this. As I said before, I think it's more a connection to the Angelic realm and a connection to that and it feels very powerful and full of love. I also do think that when different channels channel that energy it is very much filtered depending on what the channel themselves believe as that's how they are going to interpret the information etc etc..... I have had quite a few trance channel sessions where the energy takes over the channels body and the channel completely steps aside. I quite like speaking to spirit that way occassionally :-)
I dont really know how i could make my post anymore "understandable" 😊
The whole topic of Romance/Wife of / Impregnation by AAM went over my head and sounded absurd. The clarification by AAM raises doubts about the credibility of channellers. If channelled messages are clouded by personal belief, interpretation, bias and other factors then it is very hard to put your faith on the messages from a particular channeller.
Coming to my question, the name Arch Angel Michael is essentially a Christian and Biblical one, isn't it? But he should be known by different names in other major religions, I presume. So what is AAM known as in other religions? Like in Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism etc.?
Michael can be known by any name any person wishes to assign. Is anybody here knowledgeable enough in religions to say?
Awesome Thank u Patrick
Good answers from the AAMichael energy, thanks Patrick :-)
It was quite funny when all the discussion was going on about
AAM last week and I came across this lady who says she is AAM Twin and AAMichael told her that she is him incarnated and wanted her to write books etc.....
What does AAM say about this lady?
Oh BTW where is your pic scene above?
What are the questions for Michael?
California, looking west from Death Valley towards the Sierra Nevada
OK question for Michael... Where has the name Archangel Faith come from? Some believe this name is what is known as your Counterpart
@ Susan: Michael says, "This name has come from humans. I am not so honored or privileged to have what you wold call or consider a counterpart."
I am a bit confused by AAM's response. Does this mean the counterpart that we associate with him is something we as humans have created but does not actually exist? Does this also mean he doesn't have what we call a twin flame? Is AA Faith someone we would consider a different entity that is not an aspect of AAM? I think I am really confused as to whether or not AAM actually has a counterpart, twin flame, or whatever you want to call it. And if he doesn't who or what is AA Faith? Maybe it is the way his response is worded, but I keep trying to re-read it and get it, but unfortunately it doesn't happen : (
@ Praesepe9: Michael says, the answer you seek lies with the source of the concept ArchAngel Faith. Where did you first hear of this, and what understanding have you taken or developed from this and/or possibly other sources, where it has been mentioned?
When saying "an aspect of me", what human meaning does or should that have?
I am a separate, independent entity and being, as are all of you on Earth. I am no more connected to another being, energetic or physically incarnated, than is any soul. I am always connected to everyone and everything, yet always autonomous and independent, simultaneously. Just as are all of you, who read these words.
Whatever meanings or interpretation humans give to the concept of counterpart or twin flame, do not apply. Not to me or any soul. We are not automatically paired, connected or grouped to any soul. Associations are not formalized, permanent or part of long standing agreements, with beginnings and possible ending dates or moments. They are voluntary and are far more solid than human concepts typically embrace.
We were asked to go chat, gossip, ask & AAM replied thru Channel with Patrick, not to take word without asking other channels .
AAM, from thread, said baby will be born by humans involved. It’ll all be alright in the end as integration happens.
@Santanu, names aren’t arising in my awareness yet that could be my filter! maybe other cultures have different collective consciousness & vibe with other aspects? How about Confucius ? As I am a bit 🤷♂️ confused in trying to answer your q. Interesting tho.
AAM, For further clarifying, what other physical beings occupy the 2nd dimensions - eg all the off-earth ET family? Big Foot?
And, all unincarnated souls are in 3rd dimensions?
My wonderings ask more information to integrate your knowledge. (useful word - integration). Thank you.
The 2nd (or 4th Dimension) is the realm of more advanced and evolved alien extraterrestrials and Earth bound Yeti, Sasquatch or BigFoot, who transition between them.
Yes, energy beings without physical bodies (such as our souls) and the 3rd or 5th Dimensions
Does this mean that these channlers or mediums claiming to have a baby with AAM or any other AA and claim to communicate with these AA's are actually speaking to other entities claiming to be AAM or other AA's? If so, how are you to practice discernment and separate all of this from it all? I am certain these women would then say they're correct and Patrick is wrong (though my money is on Patrick and TC). So then the only reasonable explanation would be they are talking to someone, but it just isn't AAM (or the other AA's)?
That question has to be presented to "them." I have not been invited into that conversation, I am not being the access to "discern" what such people receive and believe.
Discernment = filtration of doubt & belief, or of disbelief & truth. Each one of us retains the personal, specific-to-oneself ability to do this, nobody can do it for or in place of another person.
I can sometimes, if asked by the conversation's participants, such as ArchAngel Michael where "he" is willing to respond, as he did.